Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pyranometric method

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 1187 KB  
Article
Assessment of Sunshine Duration for Various Time Resolutions Based on Pyranometric Data (An Example from Temperate Transition Climate of Central Europe)
by Krzysztof Błażejczyk, Jarosław Baranowski and Anna Błażejczyk
Atmosphere 2026, 17(1), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17010083 - 14 Jan 2026
Abstract
Sunshine duration (SD) is one of the essential meteorological variables. It represents the sum of time for which direct solar radiation with an intensity above 120 W∙m−2 reaches the Earth’s surface. In the contemporary observational routine, automatic electronic devices are [...] Read more.
Sunshine duration (SD) is one of the essential meteorological variables. It represents the sum of time for which direct solar radiation with an intensity above 120 W∙m−2 reaches the Earth’s surface. In the contemporary observational routine, automatic electronic devices are in use. The pyranometric method based on the measurements of global solar radiation measurements (Kglob) is also proposed by WMO to assess SD. The aim of the paper is to study the accuracy of the Slob–Monna method (SD-WMO), recommended by WMO to calculate sunshine duration. Alternatively, the author’s method, which is based on the Ångström clearness index (SD-ACI), was used to approximate SD. In this purpose, two years series of SD and Kglob observations at four locations in Poland (well representing Central European transitional climate zone) were analyzed. The result shows that, for SD-WMO, sunshine duration values are on average 16% higher than observed ones. For the SD-ACI method, they are only 5% higher. When verifying the accuracy of SD-WMO and SD-ACI approximations, we have found that both for daily and monthly periods the calculated SD sums are closer to the observed ones in the case of SD-ACI than for the SD-WMO method. The correlation coefficients are, respectively, 0.98 and 0.82 (for daily sums) as well as 0.99 and 0.88 for monthly sums. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Meteorology)
16 pages, 3659 KB  
Article
Applying and Improving Pyranometric Methods to Estimate Sunshine Duration for Tropical Site
by Tovondahiniriko Fanjirindratovo, Didier Calogine, Oanh Chau and Olga Ramiarinjanahary
Solar 2024, 4(3), 455-470; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4030021 - 29 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1496
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to apply all the existing pyranometric methods to estimate the sunshine duration from global solar irradiation in order to find the most suitable method for a tropical site in its original form. Then, in a second step, [...] Read more.
The aim of this paper is to apply all the existing pyranometric methods to estimate the sunshine duration from global solar irradiation in order to find the most suitable method for a tropical site in its original form. Then, in a second step, one of these methods will be optimized to effectively fit tropical sites. Five methods in the literature (Step algorithm, Carpentras Algorithm, Slob and Monna Algorithm, Slob and Monna 2 Algorithm, and linear algorithm) were applied with eleven years of global and diffuse solar radiation data. As a result, with regard to its original form, the step algorithm is in the first rank. But in the second step, after improving its main coefficients, the Carpentras Algorithm was found to be the best algorithm for tropical sites in the southern hemisphere. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 10429 KB  
Article
Comparison of Sunshine Duration Measurements between the Campbell–Stokes Sunshine Recorder and Three Automatic Sensors at Three Locations in Cyprus
by Stelios Pashiardis, Alexandros Pelengaris and Soteris A. Kalogirou
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(22), 12393; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212393 - 16 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4442
Abstract
This paper compares the daily sunshine duration (SD) measured by the Campbell–Stokes sunshine recorder (CS) with three automatic instruments (Kipp & Zonen pyranometers (CM6 B), pyrheliometer (CHP1) and CSD3 sunshine recorders). The comparisons are essential, since recently, automatic sunshine duration sensors have been [...] Read more.
This paper compares the daily sunshine duration (SD) measured by the Campbell–Stokes sunshine recorder (CS) with three automatic instruments (Kipp & Zonen pyranometers (CM6 B), pyrheliometer (CHP1) and CSD3 sunshine recorders). The comparisons are essential, since recently, automatic sunshine duration sensors have been replacing the manual measurements, affecting, therefore, the continuity of the CS time series. The comparisons were applied to the daily SD data of three synoptic stations (Larnaca A/P, Pafos A/P and Athalassa) where parallel measurements of manual and automatic instruments are carried out during the periods 2009–2012 and 2012–2015. The CSD3 measurements were obtained from two automatic weather stations (AWSs) which are close to the synoptic station of Larnaca A/P. The comparisons referred to the daily and monthly sums of sunshine duration, as well as to their statistical distributions and their relationships. The daily differences in the pairs of sunshine recorders installed at the same location are mostly within the range of −1.0 to +1.0 h. At Larnaca, in the period 2009–2012, the pyranometric method’s (Gl) values were higher than the CS in the summer months. Pafos and Athalassa showed higher values of CS compared to Gl and the pyrheliometric method (Pr), respectively, almost throughout the year. Generally, the annual average daily differences between the different pairs range between 0.3 and 0.5 h. Regression equations were determined allowing the estimation of daily SD under different sky conditions. The coefficient of determination (R2) reached the values of 0.91 and 0.96 under ‘all sky’ conditions, and between 0.80 and 0.91 under ‘clear’ sky conditions at the three locations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop