Search Results (2)

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common oncological diseases among men. Up to 20% of PC cases are associated with hereditary risks or syndromes. The impact of common variants, particularly EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A rs721048, on developing PC and other malignancies remains unclear. There are also no data on the frequency of this variant in the Kazakh population or its association with PC, nor its potential connection with other malignancies, particularly colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: We utilized the TruSight Cancer Sequencing Panel to assess pathological genomic variants in 72 male patients with histologically verified aggressive PC and 119 patients of Kazakh nationality with histologically confirmed CRC compared to the control group. Results: A variant in the intron of the EHBP1 gene c.1185+30064G>A rs721048 was identified in 18 patients (25%) out of 72 with PC, while in the control group of 41 healthy males, the rs721048 variant was found in only 4 (9.8%) individuals. In the CRC group, rs721048 was detected in 17 cases (14.2%) and eight control individuals (10%). Conclusions: The frequency of the EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A rs721048 variant in the PC group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in healthy males of Kazakh nationality. Identifying EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A among the male population of Kazakhstan will help form the high-risk groups for PC to prevent the development of malignant neoplasms. The presence of rs721048 was not significantly associated with the risk of developing CRC in our study. Full article

Introduction: Non-invasive assays are needed to better discriminate patients with prostate cancer (PCa) to avoid over-treatment of indolent disease. We analyzed 14 methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from urine samples of patients with biopsy-proven PCa relative to healthy controls and further studied discrimination of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) from healthy controls and Gleason 6 cancers. Methods: To evaluate the panel, urine from 24 healthy male volunteers with no clinical suspicion for PCa and 24 men with biopsy-confirmed disease across all Gleason scores was collected. Blinded to clinical status, DNA from the supernatant was analyzed for methylation signal within specific DNA sequences across 14 genes (HES5, ZNF655, ITPRIPL1, MAX.chr3.6187, SLCO3A1, CHST11, SERPINB9, WNT3A, KCNB2, GAS6, AKR1B1, MAX.chr3.8028, GRASP, ST6GALNAC2) by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Results: Utilizing an overall specificity cut-off of 100% for discriminating normal controls from PCa cases across the MDM panel resulted in 71% sensitivity (95% CI: 49–87%) for PCa detection (4/7 Gleason 6, 8/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+) and 76% (50–92%) for csPCa (Gleason ≥ 7). At 100% specificity for controls and Gleason 6 patients combined, MDM panel sensitivity was 59% (33–81%) for csPCa (5/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+). Conclusions: MDMs assayed in urine offer high sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Prospective evaluation is necessary to estimate discrimination of patients as first-line screening and as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Full article