Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1834 KiB  
Article
Tear Proteome Analysis with Patients with Primary Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
by Wonseok Bang, Heejeong You, Jong-Moon Park, Junyoung Park, Byeongsoo Kang, Minjung Ju, Yelin Park, Hookeun Lee, Seunghoon Back and Helen Lew
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 6449; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136449 - 4 Jul 2025
Viewed by 317
Abstract
The pathogenesis of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) remains unclear, with several factors implicated, including anatomical structures, hormones, and tear components. This study explored tear proteins to better understand PANDO etiology by comparing protein expression in tears from patients with PANDO and [...] Read more.
The pathogenesis of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) remains unclear, with several factors implicated, including anatomical structures, hormones, and tear components. This study explored tear proteins to better understand PANDO etiology by comparing protein expression in tears from patients with PANDO and healthy controls. Tear samples were collected from 22 patients with PANDO (mucous and membranous types) and 8 controls using Weck-Cel sponges. Protein analysis was conducted using LC-MS/MS to identify and quantify tear proteins. Female patients with PANDO had higher numbers of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) compared with males. Certain DEPs associated with inflammatory pathways or the lacrimal duct epithelium, including SERPINB1, SERPINA3, CTSG, SLPI, and EZR, were identified in male patients. Although this is a preliminary study, our results offer insights into the pathogenesis of PANDO, with potential to distinguish between mucous and membranous subtypes. The potential biomarkers identified in this study could enhance early diagnosis and treatment, shedding light on inflammatory and immune processes in PANDO. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 253 KiB  
Article
Balloon Dacryocystoplasty with Pushed Monocanalicular Intubation as a Primary Management for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
by Chun-Chieh Lai, Cheng-Ju Yang, Chia-Chen Lin and Yi-Chun Chi
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(3), 564; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030564 - 21 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1925
Abstract
Given the improvement in the instrument and techniques, novel surgical interventions emerged to avoid the osteotomy from the gold standard dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) for treating primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). This study’s aim is to compare the surgical outcomes of antegrade balloon dacryocystoplasty [...] Read more.
Given the improvement in the instrument and techniques, novel surgical interventions emerged to avoid the osteotomy from the gold standard dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) for treating primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). This study’s aim is to compare the surgical outcomes of antegrade balloon dacryocystoplasty (DCP) with pushed monocanalicular intubation (MCI) to balloon DCP alone in patients with complete PANDO. Adult patients with complete PANDO receiving balloon DCP followed by pushed MCI or balloon DCP alone from December 2014 to May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 37 eyes of 29 patients were treated with balloon DCP with pushed MCI for 1 month, whereas 35 eyes of 28 patients were treated with balloon DCP alone. The success rates at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation were 89.2%, 73.0%, and 70.2%, respectively, in balloon DCP with MCI group, and 62.9%, 62.9%, and 60.0%, respectively, in the balloon DCP alone group. The balloon DCP with pushed MCI group had a better success rate but only reached statistical significance at 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis was performed based on age. The success rate in those under 65 in the combined balloon DCP with MCI group was significantly higher than in balloon DCP alone group (72.7% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.004), whereas there was no significant difference between those aged at least 65 in the combined group and the balloon DCP alone group (69.2% vs. 83.3%, p = 0.2). Conclusively, there was no significant difference in the success rate between antegrade balloon DCP with and without pushed MCI in general. Nevertheless, the former procedure was associated with significantly higher surgical success rate than the latter in younger patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Challenges and Therapeutic Prospects in Eye Disease)
9 pages, 1137 KiB  
Article
Computed Tomography Morphology of Affected versus Unaffected Sides in Patients with Unilateral Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
by Pei-Yuan Su, Jia-Kang Wang and Shu-Wen Chang
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(1), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010340 - 1 Jan 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2680
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to describe the anatomical details of the bony nasolacrimal duct (BNLD) and adjacent nasal structures by analyzing computed tomography (CT) images, and to investigate their effects on the development of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). Methods: A total [...] Read more.
Background: This study aimed to describe the anatomical details of the bony nasolacrimal duct (BNLD) and adjacent nasal structures by analyzing computed tomography (CT) images, and to investigate their effects on the development of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). Methods: A total of 50 patients with unilateral PANDO who underwent dacryocystorhinostomy, with a mean age of 57.96 years, were included. The preoperative CT images were reviewed to measure the anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the BNLD at the entrance and exit levels, as well as the minimum transverse diameter along the tract. The sagittal CT images were analyzed to classify the shape of the bony canals into columnar, funnel, flare, and hourglass. The associated paranasal abnormalities, including nasal septum deviation (NSD), sinusitis, angle between the bony inferior turbinate and medial wall of the maxillary sinus, and mucosal thickness of the inferior turbinate, were investigated. Results: Fifty CT images were analyzed, and all parameters measured on both sides of the BNLD were not significantly different between the PANDO and non-PANDO sides, except for the minimum transverse diameter, which was significantly smaller on the PANDO side (p = 0.002). Columnar-shaped BNLD was the most common on both sides. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of paranasal abnormalities between sides; however, deviation of the septum toward the non-PANDO side was more common (67.9%). Conclusions: A small minimum transverse diameter of the BNLD may be a risk factor for PANDO. The association between nasal abnormalities and PANDO was not remarkable. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Orbital, Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 689 KiB  
Review
The Use of Stents in Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Requiring Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review
by Evelyn Li Min Tai, Yee Cheng Kueh and Baharudin Abdullah
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(3), 1067; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031067 - 7 Feb 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4093
Abstract
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is the most common cause of childhood epiphora. It is managed conservatively in the first year of life, after which surgical treatment is classically based on a stepwise paradigm of probing, intubation, and dacryocystorhinostomy. This systematic review aims to [...] Read more.
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is the most common cause of childhood epiphora. It is managed conservatively in the first year of life, after which surgical treatment is classically based on a stepwise paradigm of probing, intubation, and dacryocystorhinostomy. This systematic review aims to present the current role of intubation in the management of children with NLDO requiring surgical intervention. A search for English-language articles from the electronic databases PubMed, SCOPUS, and the COCHRANE library was conducted over a period of five months in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. The following keywords were used to aid retrieval: stents, children, lacrimal intubation, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, external dacryocystorhinostomy, NLDO, dacryocystitis, congenital, acquired. The primary outcome was defined as the success of the intervention, determined by resolution of symptoms and patency of the lacrimal anatomy confirmed by the fluorescein dye disappearance test or syringing. Secondary outcomes included the presence of complications. A total of 144 articles were identified; of these, 35 fulfilled the study criteria. The majority of the included studies involved lacrimal intubation alone, followed by intubation as an adjunctive procedure to balloon dacryoplasty and dacryocystorhinostomy. The overall success rate of these procedures ranged from 41.1% to 100%. Post-operative complications were reported in 65.7% of the included studies. Lacrimal intubation was most commonly performed as a primary procedure in children with NLDO, with high success rates. The main complication was stent dislodgement. There is lack of evidence regarding the benefit of intubation over probing as primary treatment of congenital NLDO. In the absence of high-quality evidence, the decision of whether to perform lacrimal intubation in children with NLDO requiring surgical intervention depends on clinical judgement and other low-level evidence, such as observational non-randomised trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Children's Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop