Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = previous vulvar surgery

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 2750 KiB  
Systematic Review
Is the Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Safe and Accurate After Previous Surgery for Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review
by Luigi Della Corte, Dominga Boccia, Federica Cinque, Cristina Pisano, Giuseppe Gullo, Valentina Billone, Stefano Restaino, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Pierluigi Giampaolino and Giuseppe Bifulco
Cancers 2025, 17(4), 673; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040673 - 17 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 713
Abstract
Lymphadenectomy for vulvar carcinoma is characterized by many complications. Studies have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a valid alternative to lymphadenectomy in the early stages of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, [...] Read more.
Lymphadenectomy for vulvar carcinoma is characterized by many complications. Studies have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a valid alternative to lymphadenectomy in the early stages of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and accuracy, as well as the oncological outcomes of SLNB following scar injection; in addition, to assess the role of a repeat sentinel node procedure in patients with local vulvar recurrence after primary treatment. Materials and Methods: A systematic computerized search of the literature was performed in the main electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Pub Med, and Cochrane Library) from 2010 to August 2024. Only scientific publications in English were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed. Results: Five articles were included in the study: four retrospective and one prospective observational studies. All patients’ characteristics, including type of surgery, postoperative morbidities, adjuvant therapy, and recurrence, as well as SLN detection and oncological outcomes, have been reported. Four studies compared the scar-injection group (cases) with the tumor-injection group (controls); only one study described the SLNB after vulvar recurrence (second procedure), comparing it with SLNB during primary vulvar surgery (first procedure). Conclusions: SLNB is a feasible and safe option in patients who have had previous excision of the vulvar tumor and in patients with a recurrence of VSCC who are not able or willing to undergo lymphadenectomy. Moreover, it accurately reflects the nodal status in these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Medical Imaging in Gynecological Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3205 KiB  
Article
Evaluating the Risk of Inguinal Lymph Node Metastases before Surgery Using the Morphonode Predictive Model: A Prospective Diagnostic Study in Vulvar Cancer Patients
by Simona Maria Fragomeni, Francesca Moro, Fernando Palluzzi, Floriana Mascilini, Vittoria Rufini, Angela Collarino, Frediano Inzani, Luciano Giacò, Giovanni Scambia, Antonia Carla Testa and Giorgia Garganese
Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1121; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041121 - 9 Feb 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2051
Abstract
Ultrasound examination is an accurate method in the preoperative evaluation of the inguinofemoral lymph nodes when performed by experienced operators. The purpose of the study was to build a robust, multi-modular model based on machine learning to discriminate between metastatic and non-metastatic inguinal [...] Read more.
Ultrasound examination is an accurate method in the preoperative evaluation of the inguinofemoral lymph nodes when performed by experienced operators. The purpose of the study was to build a robust, multi-modular model based on machine learning to discriminate between metastatic and non-metastatic inguinal lymph nodes in patients with vulvar cancer. One hundred and twenty-seven women were selected at our center from March 2017 to April 2020, and 237 inguinal regions were analyzed (75 were metastatic and 162 were non-metastatic at histology). Ultrasound was performed before surgery by experienced examiners. Ultrasound features were defined according to previous studies and collected prospectively. Fourteen informative features were used to train and test the machine to obtain a diagnostic model (Morphonode Predictive Model). The following data classifiers were integrated: (I) random forest classifiers (RCF), (II) regression binomial model (RBM), (III) decisional tree (DT), and (IV) similarity profiling (SP). RFC predicted metastatic/non-metastatic lymph nodes with an accuracy of 93.3% and a negative predictive value of 97.1%. DT identified four specific signatures correlated with the risk of metastases and the point risk of each signature was 100%, 81%, 16% and 4%, respectively. The Morphonode Predictive Model could be easily integrated into the clinical routine for preoperative stratification of vulvar cancer patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop