Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = partial thickness macular holes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 3920 KiB  
Article
Spontaneously Opening and Closing Macular Holes with Lamellar Hole Epiretinal Proliferation: A Longitudinal Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis
by Omar Moussa, Jedrzej Golebka, Gabriel Gomide, Dvir Koenigstein, Hueyjong Shih and Royce W. S. Chen
Diagnostics 2025, 15(6), 759; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060759 - 18 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 846
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Spontaneous macular hole closure is a rare phenomenon, with lamellar hole epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) frequently implicated as a potential mechanism. This study aims to analyze the presence of LHEP in patients with full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) or lamellar macular holes (LMHs) [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Spontaneous macular hole closure is a rare phenomenon, with lamellar hole epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) frequently implicated as a potential mechanism. This study aims to analyze the presence of LHEP in patients with full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) or lamellar macular holes (LMHs) that closed spontaneously without intervention. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans was conducted for 73 patients diagnosed with FTMH or LMH in a single institution. Patients with documented spontaneous hole closure were further analyzed for the presence of LHEP, other OCT findings, and clinical characteristics. Results: Of the 73 patients, eight (11%) exhibited spontaneous closure of their macular holes. LHEP was identified in all cases, regardless of hole type (FTMH or LMH). Associated OCT features on diagnosis included VMT in one eye (13%), partial or complete posterior vitreous detachment in seven eyes (88%) and epiretinal membrane in eight eyes (100%). During hole closure, an outer nuclear layer bridge was noted in six eyes (75%). Various extents of outer retinal recovery were noted following closure. After closure, five holes (63%) remained closed without further intervention, while three (38%) reopened and required surgical intervention. Conclusions: Spontaneous macular hole closure is strongly associated with the presence of LHEP, highlighting its potential role in retinal repair mechanisms. While in most patients the spontaneous closure is permanent, surgical intervention may be necessary in cases of hole recurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Coherence Tomography in Diagnosis of Ophthalmology Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3249 KiB  
Article
Swept-Source OCT Angiography Features in Patients after Macular Hole Surgery
by Sunjin Hwang, Min-Ho Kang, Mincheol Seong, Heeyoon Cho and Yong-Un Shin
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(9), 1493; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091493 - 13 Sep 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2420
Abstract
This study aimed to compare findings of optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) between eyes with nearly recovered and partially recovered outer retina after full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) surgery and to identify OCTA findings associated with visual acuity. We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients [...] Read more.
This study aimed to compare findings of optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) between eyes with nearly recovered and partially recovered outer retina after full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) surgery and to identify OCTA findings associated with visual acuity. We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who underwent surgery for idiopathic FTMH. Swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and OCTA were performed preoperatively and at three and six months postoperatively. Subgroups were divided according to the integrity of the external limiting membranes and ellipsoid zones postoperatively. Correlations of best-corrected visual acuity six months postoperatively with SS-OCT and OCTA measurements were analyzed. There was no difference in preoperative retinal or choroidal vascular index on OCTA between the nearly and partially recovered groups. Six months postoperatively, the choriocapillaris flow-void area was significantly higher in the partially recovered group than in the fellow eye. The nearly recovered group showed better choroidal vascular flow, and vision at six months postoperatively correlated with the ratio of the operated eye’s choriocapillaris flow-void area to the fellow eye. Sufficient choriocapillaris flow on OCTA is associated with better outer retinal recovery and visual outcomes after macular hole surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine for Retinal Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 8928 KiB  
Review
Primary Lamellar Macular Holes: To Vit or Not to Vit
by Lihteh Wu and Ryan Bradshaw
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(17), 5046; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175046 - 28 Aug 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 7066
Abstract
There is a wide spectrum of macular conditions that are characterized by an irregular foveal contour caused by a break in the inner fovea. These include full-thickness macular hole (FTMH), foveal pseudocyst, lamellar macular hole (LMH) and macular pseudohole (MPH). Clinical examination of [...] Read more.
There is a wide spectrum of macular conditions that are characterized by an irregular foveal contour caused by a break in the inner fovea. These include full-thickness macular hole (FTMH), foveal pseudocyst, lamellar macular hole (LMH) and macular pseudohole (MPH). Clinical examination of vitreomacular interface disorders is notoriously poor in differentiating these conditions. These conditions were initially described with slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and the main goal was to distinguish an FTMH from the others. The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has revolutionized our understanding of the foveal microstructural anatomy and has facilitated differentiating these conditions from an FTMH. However, the definitions of the other conditions, particularly LMH, has evolved over the past two decades. Initially the term LMH encompassed a wide spectrum of clinical conditions. As OCT became more widely used and observations became more refined, two different phenotypes of LMH became apparent, raising the question of different pathogenic mechanisms for each phenotype. Tractional and degenerative pathological mechanisms were proposed. Epiretinal membranes (ERMs) associated with each phenotype were identified. Typical ERMs were associated with a tractional mechanism, whereas an epiretinal proliferation was associated with a degenerative mechanism. Epiretinal proliferation represents Müller cell proliferation as a reactive process to retinal injury. These two types of ERM were differentiated by their characteristics on SD-OCT. The latest consensus definitions take into account this phenotypic differentiation and classifies these entities into LMH, MPH and ERM foveoschisis. The initial event in both ERM foveoschisis and LMH is a tractional event that disrupts the Müller cell cone in the foveola or the foveal walls. Depending on the extent of Müller cell disruption, either a LMH or an ERM foveoschisis may develop. Although surgical intervention for LMH remains controversial and no clear guidelines exist for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), eyes with symptomatic, progressive ERM foveoschisis and LMH may benefit from surgical intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Vitreoretinal Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1180 KiB  
Article
Cost-Effectiveness of Ocriplasmin for the Treatment of Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole
by Craig Bennison, Stephanie Stephens, Benedicte Lescrauwaet, Ben Van Hout and Timothy L. Jackson
J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2016, 4(1), 31472; https://doi.org/10.3402/jmahp.v4.31472 - 23 Jun 2016
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 427
Abstract
Background: If left untreated, vitreomacular traction (VMT) will infrequently improve through spontaneous resolution of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), and patients remain at risk of further deterioration in vision. The mainstay of treatment for VMT is vitrectomy, an invasive procedure that carries the risk [...] Read more.
Background: If left untreated, vitreomacular traction (VMT) will infrequently improve through spontaneous resolution of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), and patients remain at risk of further deterioration in vision. The mainstay of treatment for VMT is vitrectomy, an invasive procedure that carries the risk of rare but serious complications and further vision loss. As such, a ‘watch and wait’ approach is often adopted before this surgical intervention is performed. Ocriplasmin (microplasmin) is a potential alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic VMA/VMT that may remove the requirement for vitrectomy. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ocriplasmin for the treatment of VMT in comparison to standard of care. Study design: A cohort-based computer simulation model was developed, capturing three mutually exclusive subgroups: 1) VMT without epiretinal membrane (ERM) or full thickness macular hole (FTMH), 2) VMT with ERM but no FTMH, and 3) VMT with FTMH. Transition probabilities between health states, utilities, and resource utilisation were estimated based on clinical trial results, the literature, and expert opinion. The cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was estimated over a lifetime, using UK unit costs and utilities associated with visual acuity, adverse events, metamorphopsia, and surgical interventions. Setting: Analyses were conducted from a UK payer perspective. Population: Transition probabilities for the model were primarily estimated from patient-level data from the combined Phase 3 MIVI-TRUST trials in patients with symptomatic VMA/VMT, including when associated with a FTMH ≤400 µm. Intervention: Ocriplasmin (microplasmin) is a one-time intravitreal injection designed specifically to release the abnormal traction between the macula and the vitreous and thereby treat VMT, as well as macular hole with persistent vitreous attachment. Main outcome measure: The main outcome measure of the economic evaluation was cost per QALY. Results: In all subgroups, ocriplasmin management generated more QALYs: 1) VMT without ERM or FTMH (0.105, (0.036, 0.191)); 2) VMT with ERM but no FTMH (0.041, (0.011, 0.131)); and 3) VMT with FTMH (0.053, (−0.002, 0.113)). The initial treatment costs were partially offset by later savings and net costs were estimated at £1,901 (£1,325, £2,474), £2,491 (£1,067, £2,511), and £1,912 (£1,233, £2,506), respectively. Costs per QALY were estimated at £18,056 (£8,241, £64,874), £61,059 (£8,269, £168,664), and £36,250 (−£144,788, £290,338), respectively. Short-term efficacy parameters were found to be key drivers of results. Conclusion: Ocriplasmin is most cost-effective in VMT patients without either ERM or FTMH. Full article
Back to TopTop