Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ordonomics

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 464 KB  
Short Note
Rationalizing the GMO Debate: The Ordonomic Approach to Addressing Agricultural Myths
by Stefan Hielscher, Ingo Pies, Vladislav Valentinov and Lioudmila Chatalova
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(5), 476; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050476 - 9 May 2016
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 21784
Abstract
The public discourse on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is not only controversial, but also infused with highly emotional and moralizing rhetoric. Although the assessment of risks and benefits of GMOs must be a scientific exercise, many debates on this issue [...] Read more.
The public discourse on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is not only controversial, but also infused with highly emotional and moralizing rhetoric. Although the assessment of risks and benefits of GMOs must be a scientific exercise, many debates on this issue seem to remain impervious to scientific evidence. In many cases, the moral psychology attributes of the general public create incentives for both GMO opponents and proponents to pursue misleading public campaigns, which impede the comprehensive assessment of the full spectrum of the risks and benefits of GMOs. The ordonomic approach to economic ethics introduced in this research note is helpful for disentangling the socio-economic and moral components of the GMO debate by re- and deconstructing moral claims. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 375 KB  
Article
How do Companies Invest in Corporate Social Responsibility? An Ordonomic Contribution for Empirical CSR Research
by Matthias Georg Will and Stefan Hielscher
Adm. Sci. 2014, 4(3), 219-241; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci4030219 - 21 Jul 2014
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 10920
Abstract
This paper takes both a conceptual and an empirical approach to answer the question as to how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be connected to the company’s role as an agent of social value creation when it operates within an imperfect institutional framework [...] Read more.
This paper takes both a conceptual and an empirical approach to answer the question as to how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be connected to the company’s role as an agent of social value creation when it operates within an imperfect institutional framework of market competition. To develop a functional design for an empirical study, we draw on the concept of ordonomics, which provides a heuristics for responsible business activities in society. Drawing on ordonomics, we devise three questions: Referring to action responsibility we ask in which CSR activities companies do invest in their day-to-day business. Referring to governance responsibility we ask as to how companies realize win-win solutions through strategic commitments. In addition, with regard to discourse responsibility we ask in which stakeholder dialogues companies engage in order to discuss and find functional rules for organizing win-win solutions. In our empirical study, we reveal insights into the micro-level analysis of the CSP-CFP link and generate several new questions to be the subject of future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop