Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = nuclear liability

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
36 pages, 12554 KiB  
Review
A Review of Maritime Nuclear Reactor Systems
by Keith E. Holbert
J. Nucl. Eng. 2025, 6(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/jne6010005 - 5 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4587
Abstract
Marine reactors have been applied to floating nuclear power plants, naval vessels such as submarines, and civilian ships such as icebreakers. Nuclear-powered shipping is gaining increased interest because of decarbonization goals motivated by climate change. Enhanced reactor safety can potentially reduce regulatory and [...] Read more.
Marine reactors have been applied to floating nuclear power plants, naval vessels such as submarines, and civilian ships such as icebreakers. Nuclear-powered shipping is gaining increased interest because of decarbonization goals motivated by climate change. Enhanced reactor safety can potentially reduce regulatory and liability challenges to the adoption of nuclear propulsion systems for merchant ships. This gives strong impetus for reviewing past use of nuclear reactor systems in marine environments, especially from the perspective of any accident scenarios, lest planners be caught unaware of historical incidents. To that end, a loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in a Lenin icebreaker reactor in 1965 and disposal at sea of some of its damaged fuel and reactor vessel as well as the entire tri-reactor compartment is recounted. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2005 KiB  
Article
The Paradox of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) between High-Efficiency Energy and Waste Management Concerns in the Context of Disasters Worldwide
by Laura Elly Naghi, Narcis Sebastian Păvălașcu and Manuela Rozalia Gabor
Processes 2023, 11(3), 953; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030953 - 20 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4032
Abstract
With the uncertainty concerning the future use of natural resources due to depletion and lack of access caused by the pandemic and recent political events that led to increased prices, nuclear energy may become an alternative efficient energy. NPPs raise serious concerns, including [...] Read more.
With the uncertainty concerning the future use of natural resources due to depletion and lack of access caused by the pandemic and recent political events that led to increased prices, nuclear energy may become an alternative efficient energy. NPPs raise serious concerns, including waste management, and any case of an NPP accident has the potential to disrupt the positive impact of energy production in terms of circular economies. Our research analyzed the impact of nuclear incidents as examples of disasters worldwide to decide whether any of the different forms of insurance coverage could be useful in future events. By using 2533 historical records of incidents from 1901 to June 2022, we set out to find the best predictor of damage causes and further observe whether the validation of current forms of insurance may be possible. The disaster subtype and declaration represent the best predictor of the total damage value (adjusted or not) for all types of disasters, including nuclear. The results are important inputs for underwriters working in insurance, including in radioactive waste management, which must consider historical data in order to tailor future contracts, adjusting the cost and coverage to the type of disaster. Our results highlight that with an increase of only one event involving a nuclear source, the total adjusted damages will increase by USD 1,821,087.09 thousand, representing 75% of the damage costs of the rest of the disaster subtypes. The results are useful for public entities to evaluate nuclear energy as a new solution and can help further adapt existing policies to include better responses for waste prevention, reuse and recycling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Circular Economy and Efficient Use of Resources (Volume II))
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 335 KiB  
Article
The Development of Floating Nuclear Power Platforms: Special Marine Environmental Risks, Existing Regulatory Dilemmas, and Potential Solutions
by Qiuwen Wang, Yan Zhang and Hu Zhang
Sustainability 2023, 15(4), 3022; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043022 - 7 Feb 2023
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 6720
Abstract
Floating nuclear power platforms (FNPPs) are a novel form of nuclear energy infrastructure that is designed to generate electricity in coastal regions, particularly in areas with limited land availability or difficulty in building traditional nuclear power plants. However, the development and deployment of [...] Read more.
Floating nuclear power platforms (FNPPs) are a novel form of nuclear energy infrastructure that is designed to generate electricity in coastal regions, particularly in areas with limited land availability or difficulty in building traditional nuclear power plants. However, the development and deployment of FNPPs have raised significant concerns about their potential marine environmental risks and the adequacy of the existing international regulatory framework for regulating these risks. This research aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the regulation of FNPPs from an international law perspective, using a policy analysis approach to examine relevant legal instruments and their ability to regulate the environmental risks posed by FNPPs. This study identifies regulatory shortcomings and gaps in the current international legal framework, including pollution regulation dilemmas caused by FNPP positioning, potential conflicts between pollution regulation and freedom of navigation, deficiencies in environmental regulations, problems in the marine environmental impact assessment of FNPPs, and insufficient liability and compensation regime. This research also explores the potential solutions for improving the international regulatory framework, enhancing its ability to effectively address the marine environmental challenges posed by the development and deployment of FNPPs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Conservation and Sustainability)
18 pages, 1953 KiB  
Article
Legal and Regulatory Development of Nuclear Energy in Bangladesh
by Ridoan Karim, Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki, Mohammad Ershadul Karim, Abu Bakar Munir, Imtiaz Mohammad Sifat, Siti Hawa Abu-Bakar, Nurul Aini Bani and Mohd Nabil Muhtazaruddin
Energies 2018, 11(10), 2847; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102847 - 21 Oct 2018
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 7722
Abstract
The adequacy of legal and regulatory framework relating to nuclear energy in Bangladesh has sparked many questions since the government took the formal decision to establish a nuclear power plant (NPP) at Rooppur. Consequently, the government has taken some measures to make a [...] Read more.
The adequacy of legal and regulatory framework relating to nuclear energy in Bangladesh has sparked many questions since the government took the formal decision to establish a nuclear power plant (NPP) at Rooppur. Consequently, the government has taken some measures to make a comprehensive and robust framework to ensure safe and secure nuclear energy production in the country. Even though these initiatives are highly appreciable, there remain certain regulatory concerns which this paper has attempted to reflect. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to showcase the recent legal and regulatory development of Bangladesh in relation to nuclear energy and to recommend further developments. The study was based on secondary sources where a doctrinal research was carried out to solve particular research questions. The safety and security of the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant will frankly rely on how the government of Bangladesh plans and learns to implement, design, safeguard, exchange and further develop nuclear energy related knowledge and talent around the country. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10 Years Energies - Horizon 2028)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 210 KiB  
Article
Legislative Study on China’s Compensation for Nuclear Damage Liability
by Jiu Liu, Bingyu Liu and Dantao Chen
Sustainability 2018, 10(7), 2222; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072222 - 28 Jun 2018
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3702
Abstract
The civil nuclear industry plays an important role in improving environmental quality and safeguarding energy security in China. Nevertheless, the industry is facing a huge risk of nuclear accident damage. The legal system of nuclear damage compensation is of vital importance for the [...] Read more.
The civil nuclear industry plays an important role in improving environmental quality and safeguarding energy security in China. Nevertheless, the industry is facing a huge risk of nuclear accident damage. The legal system of nuclear damage compensation is of vital importance for the industry to address potential risks. The Nuclear Safety Law, which has recently been published in China, stipulates two articles about nuclear damage compensation in principle. However, in general, the current nuclear damage compensation legal system in China has not yet been made systematic and there are still problems, such as a lack of maneuverability and details. This paper adopts qualitative and quantitative methodologies to summarize and analyze the current legislation and regulation pertaining to civil nuclear damage compensation liability in China and analyzes the shortages and deficiencies of these rules in detail by using legal analysis methods. Suggestions to establish and perfect China’s legal system of nuclear damage compensation are proposed to safeguard the healthy development of the civil nuclear industry and remedy damages brought about by nuclear accidents. Such a legal system should contain the elements of clear legislative goals and objectives, a specific definition and scope of nuclear damage, strict and sole responsibility principles for operators, an appropriate liability amount, a stable financial guarantee for operators, and national supplementary liability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nuclear Safety, Emergency, Security: Theory and Technology)
16 pages, 1144 KiB  
Article
Nuclear Insurance Subsidies Cost from Post-Fukushima Accounting Based on Media Sources
by John J. Laureto and Joshua M. Pearce
Sustainability 2016, 8(12), 1301; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121301 - 12 Dec 2016
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 8844
Abstract
Quantification of nuclear liability insurance is difficult without arbitrary liability caps; however, post-mortem calculations can be used to calculate insurance costs. This study analyzes the Fukushima (Daiichi) nuclear power plant disaster to quantify the cost per unit electricity ($/kWh) of nuclear energy from [...] Read more.
Quantification of nuclear liability insurance is difficult without arbitrary liability caps; however, post-mortem calculations can be used to calculate insurance costs. This study analyzes the Fukushima (Daiichi) nuclear power plant disaster to quantify the cost per unit electricity ($/kWh) of nuclear energy from the lifetime of the plant after accounting for the true cost of the liability needed to cover the damages from the nuclear disaster determined from news reports. These costs are then compared to the cost of electricity currently paid by Japanese consumers, and then are aggregated to determine the indirect subsidy for nuclear power providers in both Japan and the USA. The results show that the reported costs of the Fukushima nuclear disaster are $20–525 billion, which results in a real insurance cost from the lifetime of electricity produced at the plants between $0.22–5.78/kWh. These values are far higher than the current insurance costs by Japanese law of $0.01/kWh and even the total costs consumers pay for electricity. Although the spread in the input costs is large and the reported metrics are incomplete, the nuclear insurance subsidy is clearly substantial in Japan and in the USA. Ideally, energy sources should be economically sustainable without the need for a government insurance subsidy. For the electricity market to function effectively and efficiently in all other countries using nuclear power, the insurance costs should be reported accurately and included in nuclear electricity costs without arbitrary government liability caps. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Nuclear Power)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 796 KiB  
Article
A Nuclear Third Party Liability Regime of a Multilateral Nuclear Approaches Framework in the Asian Region
by Makiko Tazaki
Sustainability 2014, 6(1), 436-448; https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010436 - 21 Jan 2014
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5050
Abstract
There are two primary challenges for establishing nuclear third party liability (TPL) regimes within multilateral nuclear approaches (MNA) to nuclear fuel cycle facilities in the Asian region. The first challenge is to ensure secure and prompt compensation, especially for transboundary damages, which is [...] Read more.
There are two primary challenges for establishing nuclear third party liability (TPL) regimes within multilateral nuclear approaches (MNA) to nuclear fuel cycle facilities in the Asian region. The first challenge is to ensure secure and prompt compensation, especially for transboundary damages, which is also a challenge for a nation-based facility. One possible solution is that in order to share common nuclear TPL principles, all states in the region participate in the same international nuclear TPL convention, such as the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC), with a view to its entry into force in the future. One problem with this approach is that many states in the Asian region need to raise their amount of financial security in order to be able to participate in the CSC. The second challenge lies with the multiple MNA member states and encompasses the question of how decisions are to be made and responsabilities of an installation state are to be shared in case of a nuclear incident. Principally, a host state of the MNA facility takes on this responsibility. However, in certain situations and in agreement with all MNA member states, such responsibilities can be indirectly shared among all MNA member states. This can be done through internal arrangements within the MNA framework, such as reimbursement to a host state based on pre-agreed shares in accordance with investment and/or making deposits on such reimbursements in case of an incident. Full article
24 pages, 965 KiB  
Article
Modular Lead-Bismuth Fast Reactors in Nuclear Power
by Georgy Toshinsky and Vladimir Petrochenko
Sustainability 2012, 4(9), 2293-2316; https://doi.org/10.3390/su4092293 - 18 Sep 2012
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 12195
Abstract
On the basis of the unique experience of operating reactors with heavy liquid metal coolant–eutectic lead-bismuth alloy in nuclear submarines, the concept of modular small fast reactors SVBR-100 for civilian nuclear power has been developed and validated. The features of this innovative technology [...] Read more.
On the basis of the unique experience of operating reactors with heavy liquid metal coolant–eutectic lead-bismuth alloy in nuclear submarines, the concept of modular small fast reactors SVBR-100 for civilian nuclear power has been developed and validated. The features of this innovative technology are as follows: a monoblock (integral) design of the reactor with fast neutron spectrum, which can operate using different types of fuel in various fuel cycles including MOX fuel in a self-providing mode. The reactor is distinct in that it has a high level of self-protection and passive safety, it is factory manufactured and the assembled reactor can be transported by railway. Multipurpose application of the reactor is presumed, primarily, it can be used for regional power to produce electricity, heat and for water desalination. The Project is being realized within the framework of state-private partnership with joint venture OJSC “AKME-Engineering” established on a parity basis by the State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” and the Limited Liability Company “EuroSibEnergo”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Nuclear Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 252 KiB  
Dissertation
The Contribution of Multilateral Nuclear Approaches (MNAs) to the Sustainability of Nuclear Energy
by Makiko Tazaki and Yusuke Kuno
Sustainability 2012, 4(8), 1755-1775; https://doi.org/10.3390/su4081755 - 13 Aug 2012
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 6892
Abstract
Multilateral Nuclear Approaches (MNAs) is a concept of international and/or multilateral control of nuclear material and/or nuclear fuel cycle facilities. It is a strategy for contributing to and promoting the sustainability of nuclear energy while enhancing nuclear nonproliferation, by ensuring nuclear fuel supplies [...] Read more.
Multilateral Nuclear Approaches (MNAs) is a concept of international and/or multilateral control of nuclear material and/or nuclear fuel cycle facilities. It is a strategy for contributing to and promoting the sustainability of nuclear energy while enhancing nuclear nonproliferation, by ensuring nuclear fuel supplies and fuel cycle services, and risk control and reducing risk regarding nuclear safety. In order to establish such a MNA, the authors draw out 12 features of the MNA by analyzing various past and current MNA proposals, together with the current environment surrounding nuclear energy use. Those proposals are: (A) nuclear nonproliferation, (B) assurance of supply of nuclear material and fuel cycle services, (C) access to technologies, (D) multilateral involvement, (E) siting—choice of host state, (F) legal aspects, (G) political and public acceptance, (H) economics, (I) nuclear safety, (J) nuclear liability, (K) transportation, and (L) geopolitics. These proposals are also expected to serve as a guidepost and evaluation criteria of MNA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Nuclear Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop