Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = newly identified periodontal pathogens

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 1764 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Genetic and Functional Diversity of Porphyromonas gingivalis Survival Factor RagAB
by Pauline G. Montz, Evdokia Dafni, Bernd Neumann, Dongmei Deng, Mohamed M. H. Abdelbary and Georg Conrads
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(3), 1073; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031073 - 26 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1408
Abstract
Porphyromonas gingivalis is a key pathogen in periodontitis. Its outer membrane contains the RagAB transport complex, which has been implicated in protein uptake, essential for a proteolytic species. RagA is a 22-stranded β-barrel, and RagB is the corresponding 4-TPR lid, together forming a [...] Read more.
Porphyromonas gingivalis is a key pathogen in periodontitis. Its outer membrane contains the RagAB transport complex, which has been implicated in protein uptake, essential for a proteolytic species. RagA is a 22-stranded β-barrel, and RagB is the corresponding 4-TPR lid, together forming a TonB-dependent system acting as a “pedal bin”. Four different alleles were observed, of which ragAB-1 is more virulent than the others. Our aim was to map ragAB in 129 strains of P. gingivalis and related species available in our collection, supported by a newly introduced universal PCR for amplification/sequencing of all four ragA variants and to find reasons for the differences in virulence and/or fitness. Regarding the PCR method, by pairing established Long-PCR primers with our newly designed sequencing primers (ragA-F0, -F1, -R2, -R2a, -R4), it was possible to amplify and sequence all four ragA variants. The same was not possible for ragB due to high heterogeneity. The mapping allowed us to type all strains into ragAB-1-4. For each type, some strains (of mainly animal origin such as Porphyromonas gulae) with slightly different amino acid sequences were identified (designated ragAB-1a to -4a). In terms of function, the transfer of recently discovered SusCD information to the similar RagAB complex provided new insights. Substrate specificity as well as length of pedal could be the route to differential virulence (survival rate, fitness) as Rag-1 (closer related to Rag-3/4) and Rag-2 were found to be massively different here. In general, substrate–ligand-binding sites seem to be quite variable with the exception of Rag-1, probably indicating nutritional preferences. In addition, an insertion (8 aa long) found in loop L7 throughout RagA-2 could not only affect the dynamics of lid opening/closing but might also alter the associated substrate throughput rate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4553 KiB  
Review
Revisiting Socransky’s Complexes: A Review Suggesting Updated New Bacterial Clusters (GF-MoR Complexes) for Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions
by Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes, Grace Anne Mosley, William Ross, Ally Dagher, Bruno Gomes dos Santos Martins and Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes
Microorganisms 2024, 12(11), 2214; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112214 - 31 Oct 2024
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3842
Abstract
This review aimed to identify newly discovered bacteria from individuals with periodontal/peri-implant diseases and organize them into new clusters (GF-MoR complexes) to update Socransky’s complexes (1998). For methodological development, the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) strategy was used for the focus question construction: “In [...] Read more.
This review aimed to identify newly discovered bacteria from individuals with periodontal/peri-implant diseases and organize them into new clusters (GF-MoR complexes) to update Socransky’s complexes (1998). For methodological development, the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) strategy was used for the focus question construction: “In patients with periodontal and/or peri-implant disease, what bacteria (microorganisms) were detected through laboratory assays?” The search strategy was applied to PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Embase. The search key terms, combined with Boolean markers, were (1) bacteria, (2) microbiome, (3) microorganisms, (4) biofilm, (5) niche, (6) native bacteria, (7) gingivitis), (8) periodontitis, (9) peri-implant mucositis, and (10) peri-implantitis. The search was restricted to the period 1998–2024 and the English language. The bacteria groups in the oral cavity obtained/found were retrieved and included in the GF-MoR complexes, which were based on the disease/condition, presenting six groups: (1) health, (2) gingivitis, (3) peri-implant mucositis, (4) periodontitis, (5) peri-implantitis, and (6) necrotizing and molar–incisor (M-O) pattern periodontitis. The percentual found per group refers to the number of times a specific bacterium was found to be associated with a particular disease. A total of 381 articles were found: 162 articles were eligible for full-text reading (k = 0.92). Of these articles, nine were excluded with justification, and 153 were included in this review (k = 0.98). Most of the studies reported results for the health condition, periodontitis, and peri-implantitis (3 out of 6 GF-MoR clusters), limiting the number of bacteria found in the other groups. Therefore, it became essential to understand that bacterial colonization is a dynamic process, and the bacteria present in one group could also be present in others, such as those observed with the bacteria found in all groups (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannarela forsythia, Treponema denticola, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans) (GF-MoR’s red triangle). The second most observed bacteria were grouped in GF-MoR’s blue triangle: Porphyromonas spp., Prevotela spp., and Treponema spp., which were present in five of the six groups. The third most detected bacteria were clustered in the grey polygon (GF-MoR’s grey polygon): Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia, Campylobacter rectus, and Eikenella corrodens. These three geometric shapes had the most relevant bacteria to periodontal and peri-implant diseases. Specifically, per group, GF-MoR’s health group had 58 species; GF-MoR’s gingivitis group presented 16 bacteria; GF-MoR’s peri-implant mucositis included 17 bacteria; GF-MoR’s periodontitis group had 101 different bacteria; GF-MoR’s peri-implantitis presented 61 bacteria; and the last group was a combination of necrotizing diseases and molar–incisor (M-I) pattern periodontitis, with seven bacteria. After observing the top seven bacteria of all groups, all of them were found to be gram-negative. Groups 4 and 5 (periodontitis and peri-implantitis) presented the same top seven bacteria. For the first time in the literature, GF-MoR’s complexes were presented, gathering bacteria data according to the condition found and including more bacteria than in Socransky’s complexes. Based on this understanding, this study could drive future research into treatment options for periodontal and peri-implant diseases, guiding future studies and collaborations to prevent and worsen systemic conditions. Moreover, it permits the debate about the evolution of bacterial clusters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Microbes and Human Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 588 KiB  
Article
Administration of Clinical COVID-19 Mouthwashing Protocol and Potential Modulation of Pediatric Oral Bacterial Prevalence of Selenomonas noxia: A Pilot Study
by Praneeti Sodhi, Yuxin Jiang, Summer Lin, Jackson Downey, Chase Sorenson, Melika Shayegh, Victoria Sullivan, Karl Kingsley and Katherine M. Howard
Pediatr. Rep. 2023, 15(3), 414-425; https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric15030038 - 11 Jul 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1878
Abstract
Dental office protocols to combat the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic include mouth washing for an extended 60 s, thereby reducing detectable oral virus. However, it is unclear whether this protocol has any effects on the newly identified periodontal pathogen and obesity-related bacterium often found [...] Read more.
Dental office protocols to combat the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic include mouth washing for an extended 60 s, thereby reducing detectable oral virus. However, it is unclear whether this protocol has any effects on the newly identified periodontal pathogen and obesity-related bacterium often found among pediatric patients, Selenomonas noxia. To determine if the mouthwash protocol has any measurable effect on S. noxia amongst pediatric patients, clinical pediatric saliva samples were obtained from pediatric patients during routine visits for clinical care and treatment. Using an approved protocol, two saliva samples were collected on the same visit before and after chlorhexidine mouthwash (Sample A, Sample B). The third sample (Sample C) was taken at the recall appointment—usually between two and eight weeks later. A total of n = 97 pre-mouthwash samples, and an equal number of matching post-mouthwash samples (n = 97) were collected, with a small number of matching recall samples (n = 36) that were subsequently collected and identified. The demographic composition of the study sample was analyzed using Chi square statistics. Sample DNA from the matching pre-, post-, and recall collections (Sample A, Sample B, and Sample C) was isolated and screened using qPCR and validated primers, which revealed that 11.1% (n = 4/36) from Sample A tested positive for S. noxia with 0% (n = 0/36) of Sample B testing positive and 13.9% (n = 5/36) of the recall (Sample C) testing positive. In addition, comparative analysis of the qPCR cycle threshold data revealed relatively lower expression (quantity) of S. noxia DNA among the recall samples, as determined by two-tailed t-tests (p=0.004). These data and results provide new evidence for the oral prevalence of S. noxia among pediatric patients, while also demonstrating that the COVID-19 protocol of mouth washing prior to clinical treatment for periods extending up to 60 s may be sufficient to reduce the levels of detectable S. noxia—at least temporarily. More research will be needed to determine whether these effects may be limited to the short- or may exhibit more lasting effects in the long-term. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 274 KiB  
Article
The Subgingival Microbiome in Patients with Down Syndrome and Periodontitis
by Lourdes Nóvoa, María del Carmen Sánchez, Juan Blanco, Jacobo Limeres, Maigualida Cuenca, María José Marín, Mariano Sanz, David Herrera and Pedro Diz
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(8), 2482; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082482 - 2 Aug 2020
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3643
Abstract
Objective: To describe the subgingival microbiome of individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study that obtained bacterial DNA samples from 50 patients with DS, 25 with periodontitis (PDS) and 25 with a healthy periodontal condition (HDS). The samples [...] Read more.
Objective: To describe the subgingival microbiome of individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study that obtained bacterial DNA samples from 50 patients with DS, 25 with periodontitis (PDS) and 25 with a healthy periodontal condition (HDS). The samples were analyzed by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene V3–V4 hypervariable region using the MiSeq System. Taxonomic affiliations were assigned using the naïve Bayesian classifier integrated in QIIME2 plugins. We evaluated the difference in bacteria abundance between the sample groups using Wilcoxon and Kruskal–Wallis tests. We evaluated the alpha diversity of the identified species using the Observed, Chao1metric, ACE and Shannon indices and evaluated beta diversity with principal coordinate analysis (registration code: 2018/510). Results: Twenty-one genera and 39 bacterial species showed a significantly different abundance between the study groups. Among the genera, Porphyromonas, Treponema, Tannerella and Aggregatibacter were more abundant in the PDS group than in the HDS group, as were the less commonly studied Filifactor, Fretibacterium and Desulfobulbus genera. Among the species, Porphyromonas spp. and Tannerella spp. were the most abundant in the PDS group; the most abundant species in the HDS group were Pseudomonas spp., Granulicatella spp. and Gemella spp. Conclusion: Well-recognized periodontal pathogens and newly proposed pathogenic taxa were associated with periodontitis in patients with DS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Health for Special Needs, Compromised and Elderly Patients)
Back to TopTop