Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = neural mobilisation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
49 pages, 11576 KB  
Article
Interpretable AI-Driven Modelling of Soil–Structure Interface Shear Strength Using Genetic Programming with SHAP and Fourier Feature Augmentation
by Rayed Almasoudi, Abolfazl Baghbani and Hossam Abuel-Naga
Geotechnics 2025, 5(4), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics5040069 - 1 Oct 2025
Viewed by 211
Abstract
Accurate prediction of soil–structure interface shear strength (τmax) is critical for reliable geotechnical design. This study combines experimental testing with interpretable machine learning to overcome the limitations of traditional empirical models and black-box approaches. Ninety large-displacement ring shear tests were performed [...] Read more.
Accurate prediction of soil–structure interface shear strength (τmax) is critical for reliable geotechnical design. This study combines experimental testing with interpretable machine learning to overcome the limitations of traditional empirical models and black-box approaches. Ninety large-displacement ring shear tests were performed on five sands and three interface materials (steel, PVC, and stone) under normal stresses of 25–100 kPa. The results showed that particle morphology, quantified by the regularity index (RI), and surface roughness (Rt) are dominant factors. Irregular grains and rougher interfaces mobilised higher τmax through enhanced interlocking, while smoother particles reduced this benefit. Harder surfaces resisted asperity crushing and maintained higher shear strength, whereas softer materials such as PVC showed localised deformation and lower resistance. These experimental findings formed the basis for a hybrid symbolic regression framework integrating Genetic Programming (GP) with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Fourier feature augmentation, and physics-informed constraints. Compared with multiple linear regression and other hybrid GP variants, the Physics-Informed Neural Fourier GP (PIN-FGP) model achieved the best performance (R2 = 0.9866, RMSE = 2.0 kPa). The outcome is a set of five interpretable and physics-consistent formulas linking measurable soil and interface properties to τmax. The study provides both new experimental insights and transparent predictive tools, supporting safer and more defensible geotechnical design and analysis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Soil–Structure Interaction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 666 KB  
Article
Specific Neurodynamic Exercises on Pain and Disability in Old Women with Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Luis Polo-Ferrero, David Canchal-Crespo, Susana Sáez-Gutiérrez, Arturo Dávila-Marcos, Ana Silvia Puente-González and Roberto Méndez-Sánchez
Healthcare 2024, 12(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010020 - 21 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4089
Abstract
Neurodynamic exercise is a specific type of exercise used as a neural treatment that focuses on restoring altered homeostasis in the neuroimmune system by mobilising the nervous system and other structures. A prospective, randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate the effect of [...] Read more.
Neurodynamic exercise is a specific type of exercise used as a neural treatment that focuses on restoring altered homeostasis in the neuroimmune system by mobilising the nervous system and other structures. A prospective, randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate the effect of neurodynamic exercises on disability and neck pain in elderly women over four weeks. Participants were randomized into two groups: a neurodynamic (NM) group (n = 28) and a non-specific exercise (NSE) group (n = 28). Inclusion criteria were women over 65 years of age who subjectively admitted to having mechanical neck pain for more than six months. Results showed that specific neurodynamic exercises can improve pain and disability in older women with chronic mechanical neck pain. Improvements were observed in all variables (p < 0.05). Significant between-group differences in favour of the NM group were only found for neck pressure pain thresholds and both tibialis anterior muscles. Larger effect sizes were obtained in favour of the NM group, especially for pain, disability, neck extension and inclination and pressure pain thresholds. Neurodynamic exercises have been shown to be more clinically relevant in disability and neck pain in older women. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 16364 KB  
Article
Hypoalgesic and Motor Effects of Neural Mobilisation versus Soft-Tissue Interventions in Experimental Craniofacial Hyperalgesia: A Single-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
by Marta Díaz-Sáez, Cristina Sáenz-Jiménez, Jorge Hugo Villafañe, Alba Paris-Alemany and Roy La Touche
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(19), 4434; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194434 - 27 Sep 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3233
Abstract
Objective: The present trial aimed to compare the effects of the mobilisation of the nervous system (NS) to those of a soft-tissue intervention in subjects exposed to an experimentally induced hyperalgesia of the masticatory muscles. Methods: The study was a single-blinded randomised controlled [...] Read more.
Objective: The present trial aimed to compare the effects of the mobilisation of the nervous system (NS) to those of a soft-tissue intervention in subjects exposed to an experimentally induced hyperalgesia of the masticatory muscles. Methods: The study was a single-blinded randomised controlled trial. A total of 49 participants (mean ± SD age: 41 ± 11 years; 61% female) with latent myofascial trigger points (LMTrPs) in the craniofacial region were randomly assigned to one of three groups: neural mobilisation (NM), soft-tissues techniques and stretching (STT-S), and control group (CG). An initial assessment (baseline) was performed before the provocation chewing masticatory test. The pre-treatment measurements were registered 24 h later. Next, the randomised intervention was applied, and afterwards, post-treatment data were obtained. Outcome measures included pain-free maximum mouth opening (MMO), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in the trigeminal and cervical region, and trigeminal and cervical two-point discrimination (TPD). Results: ANOVA revealed significant differences for the time × group interaction for pain-free MMO and PPTs. The results showed an improvement in the MMO and the PPTs for NM and STT-S groups but not for the CG. There were no differences between the NM and STT-S groups. However, the effect sizes were large for the NM and medium for the STT-S. No differences were found for TDP between groups nor over time. Conclusions: The results show that with NM and STT-S techniques, we could influence motor and sensory variables in asymptomatic subjects with LMTrPs after a masticatory provocation test. Both techniques increased MMO and PPTs in the short term. These beneficial effects lead us to consider the importance of including these methods in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiotherapy in Temporomandibular Disorders and Headaches)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop