Search Results (2)

This study evaluated binocular visual function using automatic dual rotational Risley prisms (ADRRPs) to measure phoria and vergence ranges. Thirty-nine (mean age: 21.82 ± 1.10 years; age range: 20–24 years) healthy adults with normal binocular vision participated. Each underwent baseline refraction exams followed by phoria and vergence tests conducted using both a phoropter with Maddox rods and the ADRRPs. The results revealed a strong positive correlation between the two instruments for distance phoria (r = 0.959, p < 0.001) and near-phoria measurements (r = 0.968, p < 0.001). For vergence testing, positive fusional vergence (PFV) at distance showed a moderate-to-strong correlation for break points (r = 0.758, p < 0.001) and a moderate correlation for recovery points (r = 0.452, p < 0.001). Negative fusional vergence (NFV) at distance demonstrated a strong correlation for break points (r = 0.863, p < 0.001) and a moderate correlation for recovery points (r = 0.458, p < 0.01). Near-vergence testing showed moderate-to-strong correlations for break points (r = 0.777, p < 0.001) and recovery points (r = 0.623, p < 0.001). The inclusion of Bland–Altman analysis provides a more comprehensive evaluation of agreement between ADRRPs and the phoropter. While strong correlations were observed, systematic bias and LoA indicate that these methods are not perfectly interchangeable. The ADRRPs demonstrated potential for binocular vision assessment but require further validation for clinical application. Full article

This study evaluated changes in phoria and negative (NFV) and positive fusional vergence (PFV) when wearing a cap and/or goggles. Thirty-five healthy university students aged 20–25 years participated in the study. All participants were examined for phoria, NFV, and PFV at distance and near. A rotary prism was used before and after wearing a cap, goggles, and both a cap and goggles. The frequency of overall average change in phoria, NFV, and PFV after wearing swimming equipment compared with non-wearing ranged from one-third to four-fifths. The order of frequency in change was wearing of goggles and a cap, goggles alone, and a cap alone. The frequency of a prism prescription, determined by the relationship between phoria and vergence, was similar or higher for wearing than for non-wearing and higher at near than at distance. The effect on change in phoria and fusional vergence was greater when wearing both a cap and goggles than when wearing either alone. These findings demonstrate that wearing both swimming cap and goggles that contact or attach around the eyes influence phoria and fusional vergence by inducing pressure or pulling. These changes may contribute to the discomfort associated with the wearing of swimming equipment. Full article