Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (21)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = mva-bn vaccine

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 748 KB  
Review
Immune Response to MVA-BN Vaccination for Mpox: Current Evidence and Future Directions
by Joanne Byrne, Patrick D. M. C. Katoto, Bruce Kirenga, Wilber Sabiiti, Andrew Obuku, Virginie Gautier, Patrick W. G. Mallon and Eoin R. Feeney
Vaccines 2025, 13(9), 930; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090930 (registering DOI) - 30 Aug 2025
Abstract
The 2022 global mpox outbreak, caused by clade IIb of the monkeypox virus (MPXV), prompted emergency use authorisation of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara–Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) vaccine, previously approved for smallpox prevention. Understanding immune responses to the MVA-BN vaccine is critical to inform both [...] Read more.
The 2022 global mpox outbreak, caused by clade IIb of the monkeypox virus (MPXV), prompted emergency use authorisation of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara–Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) vaccine, previously approved for smallpox prevention. Understanding immune responses to the MVA-BN vaccine is critical to inform both current and future mpox vaccine policy, particularly amid reports of breakthrough infections in vaccinated persons, uncertainty about the durability of vaccine-induced protection, and the emergence of further outbreaks of mpox from different viral clades, including the clade I-driven public health emergency of international concern. MVA-BN elicits binding and neutralising antibody, memory B cells, and T cell responses. Immune responses vary by host factors, prior orthopoxvirus exposure, and dosing regimens. While seroconversion is generally robust, circulating antibody titres often wane rapidly, particularly in vaccinia-naïve and/or immunocompromised individuals, including people with HIV. Vaccine-induced neutralising antibody responses to MPXV are frequently lower than to vaccinia virus, and their role in protection remains ill-defined. In contrast, T cell responses appear more sustained and may support long-term immunity in the absence of persistent antibody titres. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on the immunogenicity and durability of MVA-BN vaccination, highlights challenges in assay interpretation, and outlines key research priorities, including the need to explore correlates of protection, booster strategies, and next-generation vaccine design. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 156 KB  
Conference Report
Strengthening Vaccine Safety Systems, Research, and Regional Collaboration in Africa: A Call to Action
by Beckie N. Tagbo, Chioma S. Ejekam, Winfred Oppong-Amoako, Tene Marceline Yameogo, Afework Mitiku, Dorothy O. Esangbedo, Nelisiwe Khuzwayo, Gugu Mahlangu, Samia M. Badar, Edinam A. Agbenu, Rhanda M. Adechina and Kwasi A. Nyarko
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 661; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060661 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 661
Abstract
The 8th meeting of the African Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (AACVS), constituted in 2021, convened by the Vaccine Research and Innovation Unit within the Vaccine Preventable Diseases Program, WHO Regional Office for Africa, was held virtually from 14 to 16 April 2025. [...] Read more.
The 8th meeting of the African Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (AACVS), constituted in 2021, convened by the Vaccine Research and Innovation Unit within the Vaccine Preventable Diseases Program, WHO Regional Office for Africa, was held virtually from 14 to 16 April 2025. The meeting brought together independent vaccine experts to provide advice to the Regional Director, WHO, on vaccine safety issues critical to the African region. Discussions focused on critical updates regarding ongoing regional outbreaks, safety data, and associated safety concerns, with emphasis on newly introduced vaccines, including the malaria vaccines (RTS, S and R21), the MenFive pentavalent meningitis vaccine, and the Mpox vaccines—MVA-BN and LC16—alongside the ongoing Mpox response. The Committee conducted a deep dive into comprehensive safety considerations for new vaccine introduction, active surveillance strategies, strengthening the responsiveness of pharmacovigilance systems, and advancing vaccine research and development in Africa. Key observations highlighted significant gaps in safety surveillance systems. These included delays in data collection, access, and signal detection; a lack of harmonized real-time monitoring frameworks; the underutilization of digital technologies; and inadequate manufacturer responsibilities and accountability in post-market safety monitoring. The meeting concluded with a call to action emphasizing the need for sustainable pharmacovigilance funding mechanisms, improved regional coordination, real-time data sharing, standardized early safety study protocols, strengthened manufacturer accountability, and investments in risk communication and community engagement to bolster public trust. Strengthening vaccine safety systems and enhancing regional collaboration were recognized as urgent priorities to support the safe and effective deployment of vaccines and protect public health across Africa. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccines and Public Health)
16 pages, 825 KB  
Article
Target Trial Emulation of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic Vaccine for Pre-Exposure Mpox Prevention in At-Risk Populations
by Clara Suñer, Roser Escrig-Sarreta, Cristina Galván-Casas, Eduardo Matos, Amanda Gabster, Marcelo Wolff, Dan Ouchi, Andrea Alemany, Hugo Sánchez, Sandra Huaman, Dixennia Bejarano, Lourdes Carrés-Esteve, Cristina Santiago-Fernández, Javier Corral-Rubio, Adrià Mendoza, Àngel Rivero, Vicente Descalzo, Eva Orviz, Héctor Martínez-Riveros, Leonardo Méndez-Boo, Carmen Cabezas, Araceli Arce-Arnáez, Michael Marks, Oriol Mitjà and REMAIN Study Groupadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 594; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060594 - 30 May 2025
Viewed by 716
Abstract
Background: The MVA-BN vaccine is considered effective for preventing mpox in key populations, based on observational studies, though no randomized trials have yet confirmed its effectiveness. Observational studies published to date rely on retrospective analyses of routine data, often missing information on relevant [...] Read more.
Background: The MVA-BN vaccine is considered effective for preventing mpox in key populations, based on observational studies, though no randomized trials have yet confirmed its effectiveness. Observational studies published to date rely on retrospective analyses of routine data, often missing information on relevant risk factors for mpox. Methods: Multi-country target trial emulation study with prospective data collection. Between 1 September 2022 and 15 June 2023, we recruited individuals eligible for mpox vaccination based on clinical history and exposure behaviors via healthcare centers and social venues in Spain, Peru, Panama, and Chile. Vaccinated individuals were paired with unvaccinated counterparts matched by mpox risk factors, country, recruitment date, and age. Follow-up continued via periodic surveys until 31 March 2024. The primary endpoint was symptomatic mpox occurrence ≥14 days post-vaccination. Results: The primary analysis included 1028 individuals (514 vaccinated, 514 unvaccinated) with a median follow-up time of 9.3 months (IQR 4.7–13.7). Mpox occurred in eight participants (0.8%): three vaccinated and five unvaccinated (HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.21–1.70). Adverse reactions were reported by 731 (49.6%) participants, predominantly skin reactions (703/1475; 47.7%), while systemic reactions occurred in 107 (7.3%). Long-lasting erythema at the injection site was reported in 450/1058 (42.5%) participants, persisting >6 months in 107 of them (23.8%). Conclusions: The low incidence of mpox during the study period resulted in a limited number of endpoint events, precluding robust conclusions on the efficacy of the MVA-BN vaccine as pre-exposure prevention for mpox. However, our analysis, which accounted for key confounders such as exposure behaviors, yielded results consistent with previous studies suggesting the effectiveness of the vaccine in the mpox setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1014 KB  
Review
Ocular Manifestations of Mpox and Other Poxvirus Infections: Clinical Insights and Emerging Therapeutic and Preventive Strategies
by Yuan Zong, Yaru Zou, Mingming Yang, Jing Zhang, Zizhen Ye, Jiaxin Deng, Kyoko Ohno-Matsui and Koju Kamoi
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 546; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050546 - 21 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1283
Abstract
Poxvirus infections, particularly those caused by the monkeypox virus, have emerged as significant public health threats. Ocular manifestations constitute a severe potential clinical complication associated with these infections, potentially resulting in permanent visual impairment in afflicted patients. This review aimed to examine the [...] Read more.
Poxvirus infections, particularly those caused by the monkeypox virus, have emerged as significant public health threats. Ocular manifestations constitute a severe potential clinical complication associated with these infections, potentially resulting in permanent visual impairment in afflicted patients. This review aimed to examine the clinical spectrum of ocular manifestations associated with mpox and other poxvirus infections and to evaluate current management strategies alongside emerging therapeutic interventions and prevention strategies. A comprehensive literature search was performed across major databases to identify studies reporting ocular involvement in poxviral infections. Ocular involvement in poxviral infections ranges from mild conjunctivitis and eyelid lesions to severe keratitis with potential vision loss. Mpox-related ocular manifestations are more prevalent in unvaccinated and immunocompromised individuals. Although early antiviral intervention and supportive care are critical, clinical outcomes vary considerably across viral clades. Emerging evidence indicates that tecovirimat may reduce lesion severity, although its impact on accelerating recovery remains limited. Moreover, vaccine strategies, particularly the MVA-BN (JYNNEOS) vaccine, appear to decrease ocular complications, despite regional disparities in access and implementation. Ocular complications pose a significant clinical challenge in mpox and related poxviral infections. This review highlights the need for early diagnosis and integrated treatment approaches that combine antiviral therapy, supportive care, and targeted vaccination. Further research is essential to refine treatment protocols and assess the long-term outcomes in diverse patient populations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1177 KB  
Article
Differences in Mpox and Vaccinia Immunity Induced by Non-Replicating and Replicating Vaccinia-Based Vaccines
by Getahun Abate, Krystal Meza, Yinyi Yu, Chase Colbert, Anna Jaunarajs, Azra Blazevic, Daniel F. Hoft and Sharon E. Frey
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 520; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050520 - 14 May 2025
Viewed by 837
Abstract
Background: The recent global outbreak with clade IIb and the concurrent emergence of clade I mpox virus in Africa show that mpox is a challenging problem. MVA-BN induces low-level mpox-neutralizing antibody responses that wane rapidly. This study was conducted to compare the [...] Read more.
Background: The recent global outbreak with clade IIb and the concurrent emergence of clade I mpox virus in Africa show that mpox is a challenging problem. MVA-BN induces low-level mpox-neutralizing antibody responses that wane rapidly. This study was conducted to compare the mpox immunity induced by a replication-competent smallpox vaccine and non-replicating MVA-BN. Methods: Stored sera (n = 302) and PBMCs (n = 244) collected pre-vaccination and at five post-vaccination time points in MVA-BN and six post-vaccination time points in Dryvax clinical trials were used. Antibody titers that neutralized at least 50% of mpox in cell culture were determined by the focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT) 50, and the mpox-specific T cell responses were measured using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Results: The peak geometric fold rise (95% CI) (i.e., the maximum GMFR across all study visits) in the mpox FRNT50 for subcutaneous (SC) MVA-BN, intradermal (ID) MVA-BN, and Dryvax was 22.1 (8.3, 59.1), 18.5 (8.0, 43.1), and 245.8 (100.4, 601.6), respectively. The GMFR at day 180 post-vaccination for MVA-BN (SC), MVA-BN (ID), and Dryvax was 2.4, 2.7, and 64, respectively. The mean (95% CI) peak number of mpox-specific IFN-γ-producing SFCs was 127 (43.1, 238.3), 87.3 (46, 137), and 61.2 (44.3, 77.7) for MVA-BN (SC), MVA-BN (ID), and Dryvax, respectively. On day 180, the mean SFCs in the three groups decreased to 10.8 (−34.4, 3.8), 3.3 (−6.2, 18.6), and 2.2 (−9, 12.5), respectively. Conclusions: The peak mpox-neutralizing antibody titer was >10-fold lower in MVA-BN recipients compared to those who received a replication-competent smallpox vaccine, and the level at day 180 was >20 times lower in MVA-BN recipients. MVA-BN induced similar or higher T cell responses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccines against Tropical and other Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2020 KB  
Article
Analyzing Differences in Viral Dynamics Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated RSV Patients
by Arjan Suri, Sahaj Satani and Hana M. Dobrovolny
Epidemiologia 2025, 6(2), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6020016 - 1 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1312
Abstract
Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common respiratory virus that can cause serious illness in infants and the elderly. Vaccines for RSV have recently been introduced and have been shown to reduce the severity of the disease. However, there has been limited [...] Read more.
Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common respiratory virus that can cause serious illness in infants and the elderly. Vaccines for RSV have recently been introduced and have been shown to reduce the severity of the disease. However, there has been limited examination of how viral dynamics differ between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Methods: Here, we use data from the MVA-BN-RSV Phase II vaccine study to quantify the dynamical differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients challenged with RSV. We use an ordinary differential equation model of within host viral dynamics to fit viral load data. Results: We find statistically significant differences in viral clearance rate and basic reproduction number. We also find that vaccinated patients experience a higher response variance than the placebo group. Conclusions: While the differences in viral clearance and basic reproduction number are promising, the high variability in response to the vaccine could leave many vaccinated patients without adequate protection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 200 KB  
Review
Vaccines and Antiviral Therapies for Mpox Virus in Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women: Efficacy and Maternal–Child Outcomes
by Maryum Imran, Myra Sohail, Javeria Kamran, Syeda Qaima Abbas, Khadija Azeem and Emmanuel Korir
Viruses 2025, 17(4), 456; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17040456 - 22 Mar 2025
Viewed by 751
Abstract
Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox), the major public health concern of 2022, has elicited much attention globally. In addition to the usual symptoms observed in smallpox virus infections, infected mothers were found to hold a possible risk of transmission to newborns during delivery. [...] Read more.
Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox), the major public health concern of 2022, has elicited much attention globally. In addition to the usual symptoms observed in smallpox virus infections, infected mothers were found to hold a possible risk of transmission to newborns during delivery. This review aimed to summarize recent clinical trials that involved antiviral therapy, vaccines, immunoglobulin therapy, and other pharmacological interventions specifically for treating infected pregnant women. A comprehensive search was performed using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline to find appropriate disease management strategies. Amongst the vaccines and antivirals being used for treatment, vaccines such as Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA/MVA-BN) and Lister clone 16-medium pocket size-8 (LC16m8), while prophylactically effective, have been deemed unsafe for pregnant and lactating females. Antivirals like Tecovirimat, on the other hand, are considered to be a better alternative, but they are not without risks that may outweigh the potential benefits. Additionally, efforts to reduce maternal and fetal complications include administering the MVA-BN vaccine and awareness campaigns regarding herd immunity. Therefore, necessary precautions, prophylactic vaccinations in high-risk outbreak regions, and symptomatic treatment in pregnant and lactating females currently appear to be more feasible approaches against the mpox virus. Full article
19 pages, 682 KB  
Article
Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Against MPXV of the Intradermal Administration of Modified Vaccinia Ankara Compared to the Standard Subcutaneous Route
by Valentina Mazzotta, Pierluca Piselli, Alessandro Cozzi Lepri, Giulia Matusali, Eleonora Cimini, Rozenn Esvan, Francesca Colavita, Roberta Gagliardini, Stefania Notari, Alessandra Oliva, Silvia Meschi, Rita Casetti, Giulia Micheli, Licia Bordi, Alessandro Giacinta, Germana Grassi, Saba Gebremeskel Tekle, Claudia Cimaglia, Jessica Paulicelli, Alessandro Caioli, Paola Gallì, Giulia Del Duca, Miriam Lichtner, Loredana Sarmati, Enrica Tamburrini, Claudio Mastroianni, Alessandra Latini, Paolo Faccendini, Carla Fontana, Emanuele Nicastri, Andrea Siddu, Alessandra Barca, Francesco Vaia, Enrico Girardi, Fabrizio Maggi and Andrea Antinoriadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2025, 13(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13010032 - 31 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1493
Abstract
Background: The recent resurgence of mpox in central Africa has been declared a new public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) requiring coordinated international responses. Vaccination is a priority to expand protection and enhance control strategies, but the vaccine’s need exceeds the currently [...] Read more.
Background: The recent resurgence of mpox in central Africa has been declared a new public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) requiring coordinated international responses. Vaccination is a priority to expand protection and enhance control strategies, but the vaccine’s need exceeds the currently available doses. Intradermal (ID) administration of one-fifth of the standard modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA-BN) dose was temporarily authorized during the 2022 PHEIC. Studies conducted before 2022 provided evidence about the humoral response against the vaccinia virus (VACV) after vaccination but not against the mpox virus (MPXV). Moreover, no data are available on the T-cell response elicited by MVA-BN administered subcutaneously or intradermally. Methods: We compare the two vaccine administration routes according to reactogenicity (n = 943) and immunogenicity (n = 225) of vaccine recipients attending INMI Spallanzani hospital during the 2022 vaccination campaign in Rome, Italy. Results: We found that the ID route elicited higher titers of MPXV-specific IgG (mean difference of 0.26 log2, p = 0.05) and nAbs (0.24 log2, p = 0.08) than the subcutaneous (SC) route one month after the complete vaccination cycle. At the same time, no evidence for a difference in cellular response was found. Conclusions: MVA-BN was globally well tolerated despite higher reactogenicity for the ID than the SC route, especially for the reactions at the local injection site. The ID dose-sparing strategy was proven safe and immunogenic and would make vaccination available to more people. Our data support the current WHO recommendation of using the ID route in low–medium-income countries (LMIC), although response data in people infected with the new 1b clade are urgently needed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1723 KB  
Protocol
Optimizing Microneutralization and IFN-γ ELISPOT Assays to Evaluate Mpox Immunity
by Yinyi Yu, Krystal Meza, Chase Colbert, Daniel F. Hoft, Anna Jaunarajs, Azra Blazevic, Sharon E. Frey and Getahun Abate
Vaccines 2025, 13(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13010027 - 31 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1142
Abstract
Background: Available assays to measure pox virus neutralizing antibody titers are laborious and take up to 5 days. In addition, assays to measure T cell responses require the use of specific antigens, which may not be the same for all pox viruses. This [...] Read more.
Background: Available assays to measure pox virus neutralizing antibody titers are laborious and take up to 5 days. In addition, assays to measure T cell responses require the use of specific antigens, which may not be the same for all pox viruses. This study reports the development of robust assays for the measurement of mpox-specific neutralizing antibodies and IFN-γ-producing T-cell responses. Methods: Fourteen samples from 7 volunteers who received Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) were used. The focused reduction neutralization test (FRNT) was performed using the mpox-specific A29 monoclonal antibody. Optimization and further development of FRNT were conducted using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) as the gold standard. The mpox-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was optimized using different mpox antigen preparations. Results with pre-vaccination samples were compared with post-vaccination samples using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. Results: Pre-vaccination and post-vaccination sera (n = 7) had FRNT50 (i.e., titers that inhibited at least 50% of the virus) of 109.1 ± 161.8 and 303.7 ± 402.8 (mean ± SD), respectively. Regression analysis of fold changes in FRNT50 and PRNT50 showed that the two assays closely agree (n = 25 tests on paired samples, R2 of 0.787). Using UV-inactivated mpox as an antigen, the number of IFN-γ spot-forming T cells (SFC) in pre-vaccination samples (16.13 ± 15.86, mean ± SD) was significantly lower than SFC in post-vaccination samples (172.9 ± 313.3, mean ± SD) with p = 0.0078. Conclusions: Our newly developed microneutralization test has a good correlation with PRNT. UV-inactivated mpox is an appropriate antigen for the ELISPOT assay that measures mpox cross-reactive T cells. These assays will be useful in future mpox vaccine studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1129 KB  
Article
Immunogenicity of an Extended Dose Interval for the Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola Vaccine Regimen in Adults and Children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
by Edward Man-Lik Choi, Kambale Kasonia, Hugo Kavunga-Membo, Daniel Mukadi-Bamuleka, Aboubacar Soumah, Zephyrin Mossoko, Tansy Edwards, Darius Tetsa-Tata, Rockyath Makarimi, Oumar Toure, Grace Mambula, Hannah Brindle, Anton Camacho, Nicholas E. Connor, Pierre Mukadi, Chelsea McLean, Babajide Keshinro, Auguste Gaddah, Cynthia Robinson, Kerstin Luhn, Julie Foster, Chrissy h. Roberts, John Emery Johnson, Nathalie Imbault, Daniel G. Bausch, Rebecca F. Grais, Deborah Watson-Jones and Jean Jacques Muyembe-Tamfumadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2024, 12(8), 828; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12080828 - 23 Jul 2024
Viewed by 2120
Abstract
During the 2018–2020 Ebola virus disease outbreak in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a phase 3 trial of the Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine (DRC-EB-001) commenced in Goma, with participants being offered the two-dose regimen given 56 days apart. Suspension of trial activities in [...] Read more.
During the 2018–2020 Ebola virus disease outbreak in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a phase 3 trial of the Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine (DRC-EB-001) commenced in Goma, with participants being offered the two-dose regimen given 56 days apart. Suspension of trial activities in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to some participants receiving a late dose 2 outside the planned interval. Blood samples were collected from adults, adolescents, and children prior to their delayed dose 2 vaccination and 21 days after, and tested for IgG binding antibodies against Ebola virus glycoprotein using the Filovirus Animal Nonclinical Group (FANG) ELISA. Results from 133 participants showed a median two-dose interval of 9.3 months. The pre-dose 2 antibody geometric mean concentration (GMC) was 217 ELISA Units (EU)/mL (95% CI 157; 301) in adults, 378 EU/mL (281; 510) in adolescents, and 558 EU/mL (471; 661) in children. At 21 days post-dose 2, the GMC increased to 22,194 EU/mL (16,726; 29,449) in adults, 37,896 EU/mL (29,985; 47,893) in adolescents, and 34,652 EU/mL (27,906; 43,028) in children. Participants receiving a delayed dose 2 had a higher GMC at 21 days post-dose 2 than those who received a standard 56-day regimen in other African trials, but similar to those who received the regimen with an extended interval. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 975 KB  
Article
Delivery and Safety of a Two-Dose Preventive Ebola Virus Disease Vaccine in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Participants during an Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
by Hugo Kavunga-Membo, Deborah Watson-Jones, Kambale Kasonia, Tansy Edwards, Anton Camacho, Grace Mambula, Darius Tetsa-Tata, Edward Man-Lik Choi, Soumah Aboubacar, Hannah Brindle, Chrissy Roberts, Daniela Manno, Benjamin Faguer, Zephyrin Mossoko, Pierre Mukadi, Michel Kakule, Benith Balingene, Esther Kaningu Mapendo, Rockyath Makarimi, Oumar Toure, Paul Campbell, Mathilde Mousset, Robert Nsaibirni, Ibrahim Seyni Ama, Kikongo Kambale Janvier, Babajide Keshinro, Badara Cissé, Mateus Kambale Sahani, John Johnson, Nicholas Connor, Shelley Lees, Nathalie Imbault, Cynthia Robinson, Rebecca F. Grais, Daniel G. Bausch and Jean Jacques Muyembe-Tamfumadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2024, 12(8), 825; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12080825 - 23 Jul 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2414
Abstract
During the 2018–2020 Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak, residents in Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo, were offered a two-dose prophylactic EVD vaccine. This was the first study to evaluate the safety of this vaccine in pregnant women. Adults, including pregnant women, and [...] Read more.
During the 2018–2020 Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak, residents in Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo, were offered a two-dose prophylactic EVD vaccine. This was the first study to evaluate the safety of this vaccine in pregnant women. Adults, including pregnant women, and children aged ≥1 year old were offered the Ad26.ZEBOV (day 0; dose 1), MVA-BN-Filo (day 56; dose 2) EVD vaccine through an open-label clinical trial. In total, 20,408 participants, including 6635 (32.5%) children, received dose 1. Fewer than 1% of non-pregnant participants experienced a serious adverse event (SAE) following dose 1; one SAE was possibly related to the Ad26.ZEBOV vaccine. Of the 1221 pregnant women, 371 (30.4%) experienced an SAE, with caesarean section being the most common event. No SAEs in pregnant women were considered related to vaccination. Of 1169 pregnancies with a known outcome, 55 (4.7%) ended in a miscarriage, and 30 (2.6%) in a stillbirth. Eleven (1.0%) live births ended in early neonatal death, and five (0.4%) had a congenital abnormality. Overall, 188/891 (21.1%) were preterm births and 79/1032 (7.6%) had low birth weight. The uptake of the two-dose regimen was high: 15,328/20,408 (75.1%). The vaccine regimen was well-tolerated among the study participants, including pregnant women, although further data, ideally from controlled trials, are needed in this crucial group. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccines against Tropical and other Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 448 KB  
Article
Effectiveness and Safety of the MVA–BN Vaccine against Mpox in At-Risk Individuals in the United States (USMVAc)
by Soowoo Back, Bethany Knox, Ciara Coakley, Nicolas Deltour, Emmanuelle Jacquot, Hanaya Raad and Elizabeth M. Garry
Vaccines 2024, 12(6), 651; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12060651 - 11 Jun 2024
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2996
Abstract
The mpox 2022 outbreak was declared a public health emergency in July 2022. In August 2022, the MVA–BN vaccine received emergency use authorization in the United States (US) to target at-risk groups. This study (EUPAS104386) used HealthVerity’s administrative US healthcare data to generate [...] Read more.
The mpox 2022 outbreak was declared a public health emergency in July 2022. In August 2022, the MVA–BN vaccine received emergency use authorization in the United States (US) to target at-risk groups. This study (EUPAS104386) used HealthVerity’s administrative US healthcare data to generate real-world evidence for MVA–BN vaccine effectiveness and safety to prevent mpox disease in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women, the most affected population during the 2022 mpox outbreak. Fully vaccinated subjects (two doses ≥ 28 days apart) were initially matched with five unvaccinated subjects on calendar date, age, US region, and insurance type. Subjects were followed from index date (14 days after the second dose) until death or data end to ascertain mpox occurrence. After propensity score adjustment, the MVA–BN vaccine effectiveness against mpox disease was 89% (95% CI: 12%, 99%) among those fully vaccinated; attenuated to 64% (95% CI: 40%, 78%) among those with any dose and 70% (95% CI: 44%, 84%) for those with only a single dose. One pericarditis adverse event of special interest was observed when the risk window was extended to 28 days. These results contribute to the totality of evidence supporting the favorable benefit/risk profile of the MVA–BN vaccine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccine Advancement, Efficacy and Safety)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4038 KB  
Article
Safety and Immunogenicity of an Accelerated Ebola Vaccination Schedule in People with and without Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Randomized Clinical Trial
by Julie A. Ake, Kristopher Paolino, Jack N. Hutter, Susan Biggs Cicatelli, Leigh Anne Eller, Michael A. Eller, Margaret C. Costanzo, Dominic Paquin-Proulx, Merlin L. Robb, Chi L. Tran, Lalaine Anova, Linda L. Jagodzinski, Lucy A. Ward, Nicole Kilgore, Janice Rusnak, Callie Bounds, Christopher S. Badorrek, Jay W. Hooper, Steven A. Kwilas, Ine Ilsbroux, Dickson Nkafu Anumendem, Auguste Gaddah, Georgi Shukarev, Viki Bockstal, Kerstin Luhn, Macaya Douoguih and Cynthia Robinsonadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2024, 12(5), 497; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12050497 - 4 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2347
Abstract
The safety and immunogenicity of the two-dose Ebola vaccine regimen MVA-BN-Filo, Ad26.ZEBOV, 14 days apart, was evaluated in people without HIV (PWOH) and living with HIV (PLWH). In this observer-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, healthy adults were randomized (4:1) to receive MVA-BN-Filo (dose [...] Read more.
The safety and immunogenicity of the two-dose Ebola vaccine regimen MVA-BN-Filo, Ad26.ZEBOV, 14 days apart, was evaluated in people without HIV (PWOH) and living with HIV (PLWH). In this observer-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, healthy adults were randomized (4:1) to receive MVA-BN-Filo (dose 1) and Ad26.ZEBOV (dose 2), or two doses of saline/placebo, administered intramuscularly 14 days apart. The primary endpoints were safety (adverse events (AEs)) and immunogenicity (Ebola virus (EBOV) glycoprotein-specific binding antibody responses). Among 75 participants (n = 50 PWOH; n = 25 PLWH), 37% were female, the mean age was 44 years, and 56% were Black/African American. AEs were generally mild/moderate, with no vaccine-related serious AEs. At 21 days post-dose 2, EBOV glycoprotein-specific binding antibody responder rates were 100% among PWOH and 95% among PLWH; geometric mean antibody concentrations were 6286 EU/mL (n = 36) and 2005 EU/mL (n = 19), respectively. A total of 45 neutralizing and other functional antibody responses were frequently observed. Ebola-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were polyfunctional and durable to at least 12 months post-dose 2. The regimen was well tolerated and generated robust, durable immune responses in PWOH and PLWH. Findings support continued evaluation of accelerated vaccine schedules for rapid deployment in populations at immediate risk. Trial registration: NCT02598388 (submitted 14 November 2015). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 271 KB  
Article
Long-Term Clinical Safety of the Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola Vaccines: A Prospective, Multi-Country, Observational Study
by Adeep Puri, Andrew J. Pollard, Catherine Schmidt-Mutter, Fabrice Lainé, George PrayGod, Hannah Kibuuka, Houreratou Barry, Jean-François Nicolas, Jean-Daniel Lelièvre, Sodiomon Bienvenu Sirima, Beatrice Kamala, Daniela Manno, Deborah Watson-Jones, Auguste Gaddah, Babajide Keshinro, Kerstin Luhn, Cynthia Robinson and Macaya Douoguih
Vaccines 2024, 12(2), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12020210 - 17 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2770
Abstract
In this prospective, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02661464), long-term safety information was collected from participants previously exposed to the Ebola vaccines Ad26.ZEBOV and/or MVA-BN-Filo while enrolled in phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical studies. The study was conducted at 15 sites in seven [...] Read more.
In this prospective, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02661464), long-term safety information was collected from participants previously exposed to the Ebola vaccines Ad26.ZEBOV and/or MVA-BN-Filo while enrolled in phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical studies. The study was conducted at 15 sites in seven countries (Burkina Faso, France, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Adult participants and offspring from vaccinated female participants who became pregnant (estimated conception ≤28 days after vaccination with MVA-BN-Filo or ≤3 months after vaccination with Ad26.ZEBOV) were enrolled. Adults were followed for 60 months after their first vaccination, and children born to female participants were followed for 60 months after birth. In the full analysis set (n = 614 adults; median age [range]: 32.0 [18–65] years), 49 (8.0%) had ≥1 serious adverse event (SAE); the incidence rate of any SAE was 27.4 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval: 21.0, 35.2). The unrelated SAEs of malaria were reported in the two infants in the full analysis set, aged 11 and 18 months; both episodes were resolved. No deaths or life-threatening SAEs occurred during the study. Overall, no major safety issues were identified; one related SAE was reported. These findings support the long-term clinical safety of the Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo vaccines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccines against Tropical and other Infectious Diseases)
12 pages, 2410 KB  
Article
Serosurvey of Immunity to Monkeypox (Mpox) Virus Antigens in People Living with HIV in South Florida
by Jonah Kupritz, Savita Pahwa and Suresh Pallikkuth
Pathogens 2023, 12(11), 1355; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12111355 - 15 Nov 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3089
Abstract
Mpox is an infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV) belonging to the Orthopoxvirus (OPXV) genus, which includes smallpox and vaccinia virus (VACV). A global mpox outbreak which began in May 2022 has infected more than 88,000 people. VACV-based vaccines provide protection [...] Read more.
Mpox is an infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV) belonging to the Orthopoxvirus (OPXV) genus, which includes smallpox and vaccinia virus (VACV). A global mpox outbreak which began in May 2022 has infected more than 88,000 people. VACV-based vaccines provide protection against mpox disease but complicate the use of serological assays for disease surveillance. We tested the reactivity of serum IgG from Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN)-vaccinated (n = 12) and convalescent mpox-infected (n = 5) individuals and uninfected, non-vaccinated controls (n = 32) to MPXV/VACV proteins A27, A29, A30, A35, B16, B21, C19, D6, E8, H3, I1, and L1. Using a subset of MPXV antigen-based assays (A35, B16, E8, H3, and I1), we conducted a mpox antibody survey of serum from 214 individuals, including 117 (54.7%) people with HIV (PWH) collected between June 2022 and January 2023, excluding individuals who reported recent mpox vaccination or infection, and 32 young, pre-pandemic controls. The convalescent sera reacted strongly to most tested antigens. Vaccine sera responses were limited to A35, E8, H3, and I1. IgG antibody to E8 was markedly elevated in all vaccinated individuals. B16 IgG showed high sensitivity (100% [95% CI: 56.55–100.0%]) and specificity (91.67% [64.61–99.57%]) for distinguishing infection from MVA-BN vaccination, while E8 IgG showed 100% [75.75–100] sensitivity and 100% [79.61–100] specificity for detecting and distinguishing vaccinated individuals from controls. We identified 11/214 (5.1%) recent serum samples and 1/32 (3.1%) young, pre-pandemic controls that were seropositive for ≥2 MPXV antibodies, including 6.8% of PWH. Seropositivity was 10/129 (7.8%) among males compared to 1/85 (1.2%) among females. Our findings provide insight into the humoral immune response to mpox and demonstrate the usefulness of inexpensive, antigen-based serosurveillance in identifying asymptomatic or unreported infections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Epidemic of Mpox)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop