Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = mutual insurance societies

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 627 KB  
Benchmark
Experience of Good Practice in an Occupational Accident Mutual Insurance Society, Based on the Voice of Patients and Professionals
by Diego Moya, Mar Iglesias, Rafael Manzanera, Fernanda de la Torre, Manel Plana, Gloria Gálvez and Mercedes Guilabert
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(20), 3856; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203856 - 12 Oct 2019
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2792
Abstract
In Spain, the protection of workers’ health is organized through what are known as occupational accident mutual insurance societies. While health protection is a fundamental issue within a mutual society, dimensions, such as patient quality and safety, are measured in the same way [...] Read more.
In Spain, the protection of workers’ health is organized through what are known as occupational accident mutual insurance societies. While health protection is a fundamental issue within a mutual society, dimensions, such as patient quality and safety, are measured in the same way as in the conventional healthcare sector. However, in mutual societies, it is traditionally acknowledged that experiences of medical evaluation systems of healthcare provision and quality improvement are less frequent. The following is an example of how a Quality Plan has been structured within an organization with these characteristics, and instruments and measures have been developed to capture information in decision making from the perspective of patients and professionals. The Quality Plan represents the ongoing commitment of this organization to achieve patient-centered care. These changes revolve around these measures and, therefore, it is defined as a good practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient Satisfaction with Health Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 261 KB  
Article
On the Collective Choice among Models of Social Protection: An Experimental Study
by Francesco Farina, Stefania Ottone and Ferruccio Ponzano
Games 2019, 10(4), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/g10040041 - 11 Oct 2019
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4557
Abstract
A real-effort experiment is conducted in order to detect preferences for one out of three different models of the Welfare State characterized by different tax-and-transfer schemes. We reproduce a small society in the lab where: Subjects are grouped in three stylized classes (the [...] Read more.
A real-effort experiment is conducted in order to detect preferences for one out of three different models of the Welfare State characterized by different tax-and-transfer schemes. We reproduce a small society in the lab where: Subjects are grouped in three stylized classes (the rich, the middle class and the poor) on the basis of their performance in a real-effort activity; income and risk are assigned according to the class; tax revenue is spent to refund unlucky people and to provide a public good. Experimental subjects must choose (both under and without a veil of ignorance concerning their position in the society created in the lab) among (a) a baseline proportional scheme, where the State is neutral with respect to risk heterogeneity; (b) an actuarially fair scheme where low ability and low earnings subjects bear full individual responsibility for risk exposure and (c) a progressive scheme where mutual risk insurance spreads risk across all subjects such that low ability and low earnings individuals are compensated. Our most relevant finding is that preference is motivated less by a justice principle and more by self-interested considerations on the expectations surrounding one’s own position in the society. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Empirical Tax Research and Application)
Back to TopTop