Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = multispan rigid frame

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3311 KiB  
Article
Synchronous Multi-Span Closure Techniques in Continuous Rigid-Frame Bridges: Research and Implementation
by Xinyu Yao and Chuanxi Li
Buildings 2025, 15(8), 1331; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15081331 - 17 Apr 2025
Viewed by 387
Abstract
This study investigates the Huangdong Daning River Bridge project in Guangxi, where the innovative side-span and mid-span synchronous closure technology for continuous rigid-frame bridges (CRFB) was systematically implemented for the first time in this region of China. A comparative finite element model developed [...] Read more.
This study investigates the Huangdong Daning River Bridge project in Guangxi, where the innovative side-span and mid-span synchronous closure technology for continuous rigid-frame bridges (CRFB) was systematically implemented for the first time in this region of China. A comparative finite element model developed in MIDAS Civil 2024 was employed to analyze the mechanical behavior mechanisms of main girders under span-by-span closure and synchronous closure processes. The numerical simulation results demonstrate that the stress distribution in main girders shows no significant sensitivity (<3%) to closure method differences during both the bridge completion phase and 10-year shrinkage-creep cycle. However, distinct closure sequences (asynchronous vs. synchronous) exhibited notable impacts on the girder alignment at the completion stage. The cumulative deviation induced by differential installation elevations of formwork segments necessitates precise dynamic control during construction monitoring. Furthermore, shrinkage and creep effects manifested differential influences on pier top horizontal displacements and bending moments when employing different closure methods, though all variations remained within 5%. The synchronous multi-span closure technology effectively mitigates structural mutation risks during construction while achieving superior alignment accuracy, rational stress distribution, and accelerated construction progress as verified by field implementation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 7956 KiB  
Article
Parameter Identification of Multispan Rigid Frames Using a Stiffness Separation Method
by Feng Xiao, Yu Yan, Xiangwei Meng, Yuxue Mao and Gang S. Chen
Sensors 2024, 24(6), 1884; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24061884 - 15 Mar 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1417
Abstract
Identifying the parameters of multispan rigid frames is challenging because of their complex structures and large computational workloads. This paper presents a stiffness separation method for the static response parameter identification of multispan rigid frames. The stiffness separation method segments the global stiffness [...] Read more.
Identifying the parameters of multispan rigid frames is challenging because of their complex structures and large computational workloads. This paper presents a stiffness separation method for the static response parameter identification of multispan rigid frames. The stiffness separation method segments the global stiffness matrix of the overall structure into the stiffness matrices of its substructures, which are to be computed, thereby reducing the computational workload and improving the efficiency of parameter identification. Loads can be applied individually to each separate substructure, thereby guaranteeing obvious local static responses. The veracity and efficacy of the proposed methodology are substantiated by applying it to three- and eight-span continuous rigid frame structures. The findings indicate that the proposed approach significantly enhances the efficiency of parameter identification for multispan rigid frames. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Sensing Technology and Infrastructure Health Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4192 KiB  
Article
Mechanical Performance Study of Beam–Column Connection with U-Shaped Steel Damper
by Chun-Xu Qu, Yu-Wen Xu, Jin-He Gao, Wei-Hao Zhou, Bao-Zhu Zheng and Peng Li
Materials 2022, 15(20), 7085; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207085 - 12 Oct 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2232
Abstract
The article proposes the use of a semi-rigid energy-dissipation connection combined with a U-shaped metal damper to avoid brittle failure of rigid steel beam–column connections under seismic loading. The U-shaped metal damper connects the H-section column and the H-section beam to form a [...] Read more.
The article proposes the use of a semi-rigid energy-dissipation connection combined with a U-shaped metal damper to avoid brittle failure of rigid steel beam–column connections under seismic loading. The U-shaped metal damper connects the H-section column and the H-section beam to form a new energy-dissipation connection as an energy-dissipation member. Compared with the existing research, this connection has a stable energy-dissipation performance and great ductility. To clarify the mechanism of energy dissipation, mechanical models under two U-shaped damping deformation modes are established. The calculation formulas for the yield load and stiffness are derived for the corresponding deformation mode using the unit load method. Taking the T-shaped beam–column connection and the application of U-shaped steel damper in the beam–column connection as an example, the mechanical model of the connection is established and the calculation formulas for the yield load and stiffness are derived. At the same time, the connection is subjected to a quasi-static test under cyclic loading. The results show that the hysteretic curve of the test is complete and that the skeleton curve is accurate compared to the theory. The error range of the initial stiffness and yield load obtained by the test and the theoretical formula is kept within 20%, indicating that the theoretical formula is reasonable and feasible. In addition, the correctness of the finite element model is verified by establishing a finite element model and comparing it with the test. The mechanical responses of purely rigid connections and rigid semi-rigid composite connections are compared and analyzed using a multi-story and multi-span plane frame as an example. The results show that the model with semi-rigid connections, compared to the model with rigid connections, avoids the gradual loss of bearing capacity caused by the failure of the connection area of the second floor of the main structure and improves the seismic performance of the main structure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop