Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = mini-PCNL

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 832 KB  
Article
Comparison Between RIRS and Mini-PCNL in the Treatment of Kidney Stones Exceeding 15 mm: Outcome Evaluation and Cost Analysis
by Paolo Pietro Suraci, Andrea Fuschi, Manfredi Bruno Sequi, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Alice Antonioni, Onofrio Antonio Rera, Yazan Al Salhi, Damiano Graziani, Giorgio Martino, Giuseppe Candita, Filippo Gianfrancesco, Paolo Benanti, Cosimo De Nunzio, Giorgio Bozzini, Michele Di Dio, Pierluigi Russo, Matteo Pacini, Carlo Introini, Antonio Carbone and Antonio Luigi Pastore
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(1), 177; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010177 - 26 Dec 2025
Viewed by 569
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The optimal surgical approach for kidney stones (KS) measuring 15–20 mm remains debated. RIRS and mini-PCNL are both effective options, but they differ in invasiveness, resource use, and cost. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and hospital costs of RIRS and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The optimal surgical approach for kidney stones (KS) measuring 15–20 mm remains debated. RIRS and mini-PCNL are both effective options, but they differ in invasiveness, resource use, and cost. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and hospital costs of RIRS and mini-PCNL using a micro-costing approach. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with KS > 15 mm in diameter who were treated between January 2021 and December 2023 at the Department of Urology, Sapienza University of Rome-Polo Pontino. Clinical parameters, operative time (OT), length of stay (LoS), complications, and stone-free rate (SFR) were compared. Costs were estimated using a micro-costing method, including disposable materials, operating room (OR) time (3.9 EUR/min), imaging, and hospitalization (334 EUR/day). The total cost per treated and per SF patient was calculated for both techniques. Results: A total of 119 patients were analyzed: 62 underwent RIRS, and 57 underwent mini-PCNL. Mean OT was shorter for RIRS (87 vs. 113 min; p < 0.001), and LoS was longer for mini-PCNL (2.24 vs. 1.22 days; p = 0.008). Final SFR was higher for mini-PCNL (94.7% vs. 88.7%; p = 0.043). Complication rates were comparable, with most events classified as Clavien–Dindo I–II. Disposable materials represented the main cost driver (EUR 1097 for RIRS vs. EUR 806 for mini-PCNL). The total cost per treated patient was EUR 3689 for RIRS and EUR 3154 for mini-PCNL (p = 0.009). The cost per SF patient was EUR 4159 for RIRS and EUR 3331 for mini-PCNL (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Both RIRS and mini-PCNL are safe and effective for the management of KS ≥ 15 mm. Mini-PCNL achieves higher SFR and greater cost-efficiency than RIRS. These findings support the use of mini-PCNL as the preferred option in centers with adequate expertise and resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Surgical Techniques in the Management of Urological Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 657 KB  
Systematic Review
Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Aspiration-Assisted Nephrostomic Access Sheaths in PCNL and Intrarenal Pressures Evaluation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
by Marco Nizzardo, Giancarlo Albo, Francesco Ripa, Ester Zino, Elisa De Lorenzis, Luca Boeri, Fabrizio Longo, Emanuele Montanari and Stefano Paolo Zanetti
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2558; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092558 - 26 Apr 2024
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2768
Abstract
Background: Different suction-assisted nephrostomic sheaths have been developed for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Objectives: (1) To examine PCNL techniques performed with different aspiration-assisted sheaths (Clear Petra® sheath, Superperc, SuperminiPCNL, and a miniPCNL patented sheath), with specific regard to effectiveness and safety outcomes in [...] Read more.
Background: Different suction-assisted nephrostomic sheaths have been developed for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Objectives: (1) To examine PCNL techniques performed with different aspiration-assisted sheaths (Clear Petra® sheath, Superperc, SuperminiPCNL, and a miniPCNL patented sheath), with specific regard to effectiveness and safety outcomes in adult and paediatric patients; (2) to extrapolate intrarenal pressure (IRP) data during these procedures. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Relevant articles up to 8 February 2024 were included. Results: Twenty-five studies were selected, thirteen retrospective and twelve prospective. The use of four different aspirating sheaths for miniPCNL was reported: Clear Petra® sheath, Superperc, SuperminiPCNL, and a miniPCNL patented sheath. Stone free rates (SFRs) across techniques ranged from 71.3% to 100%, and complication rates from 1.5% to 38.9%. Infectious complication rates varied from 0 to 27.8% and bleeding complication rates from 0 to 8.9%. Most complications were low grade ones. The trend among studies comparing aspiration- and non-aspiration-assisted miniPCNL was towards equivalent or better SFRs and lower overall infectious and bleeding complication rates in suction techniques. Operation time was consistently lower in suction procedures, with a mean shortening of the procedural time of 19 min. Seven studies reported IRP values during suction miniPCNL. Two studies reported satisfactory SFRs and adequate safety profiles in paediatric patient cohorts. Conclusions: MiniPCNL with aspirating sheaths appears to be safe and effective in both adult and paediatric patients. A trend towards a reduction of overall infectious and bleeding complications with respect to non-suction procedures is evident, with comparable or better SFRs and consistently shorter operative times. The IRP profile seems to be safe with the aid of aspirating sheaths. However, high quality evidence on this topic is still lacking. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Surgical Management of Urinary Stones)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 538 KB  
Article
Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Tubeless Supine Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Bilateral Renal Calculi in Renal Failure Patients
by Puvai Murugan Ponnuswamy, Bhalaguru Iyyan Arumugam, Shree Vishnu Siddarth Rajagopal and Krishna Mohan Boopathy Vijayaraghavan
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2024, 5(1), 56-63; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj5010011 - 18 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2724
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, feasibility, stone-free rate, and complications of bilateral tubeless supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (M-PCNL) for bilateral multiple renal calculi with renal failure as a single-stage procedure. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2020 to March [...] Read more.
Background: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, feasibility, stone-free rate, and complications of bilateral tubeless supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (M-PCNL) for bilateral multiple renal calculi with renal failure as a single-stage procedure. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2020 to March 2022 in adult patients with bilateral renal or proximal ureteric calculi with renal failure who were subjected to bilateral supine tubeless M-PCNL. Patients on regular hemodialysis before the procedure were excluded. Data regarding the demographic profile, stone characteristics on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), duration of surgery, complications, and auxiliary procedures were retrieved from clinical records. Residual stone fragments of≤4mm in NCCT were considered clinically insignificant. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society validation ofClavien score for PCNL complications was used. Results: A total of twenty-seven patients with a mean age of 45.9years were included in this study. The mean size of stone diameter per renal unit was 2.4 ± 0.4 cm. The mean preoperative serum creatinine was 2.8 mg/dL. A total of 62 tracts and 27 sessions were required for complete treatment of all 54 renal units in the 27 successfully treated patients. The average operating time was 75 (52–122) min on both sides. Serum creatinine drop at onemonth postsurgery was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Mean hospitalization time was 3.6 days [3–6 days]. The primary stone-free rate was 92.5%. Grade I, II, and IVA complications were recorded in three (11.1%), eight (29.6%), and two (7.4%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: Bilateral tubeless supine M-PCNL for bilateral renal calculi in selective patients with renal failure in a single session is a safe, feasible, and effective option which can be carried out without increased morbidity and can be attempted if the first-side M-PCNL has gone smoothly within a reasonable amount of time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 319 KB  
Article
The Consecutive 200 Cases of Endoscopic-Combined Intrarenal Surgery: Comparison between Standard and Miniature Surgeries
by Young Joon Moon, Kang Su Cho, Dae Chul Jung, Doo Yong Chung and Joo Yong Lee
Medicina 2023, 59(11), 1971; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111971 - 8 Nov 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2471
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still the gold-standard treatment for large and/or complex renal stones. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was developed with the goal of minimizing the number of access tracts of PCNL while simultaneously improving the one-step stone-free [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still the gold-standard treatment for large and/or complex renal stones. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was developed with the goal of minimizing the number of access tracts of PCNL while simultaneously improving the one-step stone-free rate (SFR). The aim of this study was to share the experience of the consecutive 200 cases of ECIRS in one institute and analyze surgical outcomes of mini-ECIRS and standard ECIRS. Materials and Methods: We performed ECIRS for 200 adult patients between July 2017 and January 2020. An ECIRS was performed with the patient under general anesthesia in the intermediate-supine position. Surgeries were finished using a tubeless technique with a simple ureteral stent insertion. Results: There were significant differences in the mean maximal stone length (MSL), the variation coefficient of stone density (VCSD), the linear calculus density (LCD), the Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC), and the modified S-ReSC scores in stone characteristics, and estimated blood loss (EBL) and operation time in peri-operative outcomes between conventional and mini-ECIRS. After propensity-score matching, there was only a difference in EBL between the two groups. In logistic regression models, MSL [odds ratio (OR) 0.953; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.926–0.979; p < 0.001], LCD (OR 4.702; 95% CI 1.613–18.655; p = 0.013) were significant factors for the success rate after ECIRS. Conclusions: In patients who underwent a mini-ECIRS, the stones were relatively smaller and less complex, and the operation time was shorter. However, if the size of stones was similar, there was no difference in the success rate, but EBL was lower in mini-ECIRS than in standard surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Update of Urolithiasis and Treatment)
10 pages, 2662 KB  
Article
Single-Center Experience with Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy for Kidney Stones
by Victor-Mihail Cauni, Florin Tanase, Bogdan Mihai, Gabriel-Petre Gorecki, Liana Ples, Romina-Marina Sima and Cristian Persu
Diagnostics 2023, 13(8), 1372; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13081372 - 8 Apr 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2549
Abstract
Introduction: PCNL remains the gold standard for larger kidney stones. Reducing the operating time of PCNL and its complication rate seems to be the next logical step in optimizing this classical technique. To achieve these objectives, some new methods of lithotripsy emerge. We [...] Read more.
Introduction: PCNL remains the gold standard for larger kidney stones. Reducing the operating time of PCNL and its complication rate seems to be the next logical step in optimizing this classical technique. To achieve these objectives, some new methods of lithotripsy emerge. We present the data of a single, high-volume, academic center with combined ultrasonic and ballistic lithotripsy in PCNL using the Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy device. Materials and Methods: We designed a prospective, randomized study including patients who underwent PCNL or miniPerc with lithotripsy using the new EMS Lithoclast Trilogy or EMS Lithoclast Master. The procedure was carried out with all patients in prone position, by the same surgeon. The working channel size was 24 Fr–15.9 Fr. We evaluated the stones’ features, operative time, fragmentation time, complications, stone clearance rate and stone-free rate. Results: Our study included 59 patients, 38 females and 31 males, of an average age of 54.5 years old. The Trilogy group included 28 patients and the comparator included 31 patients. Urine culture was positive in seven cases which required seven days of antibiotics. The mean stone diameter was 35.6 mm with a mean Hounsfield unit (HU) of 710.1. The average number of stones was 2.08 (6 complete staghorn stones and 12 partial staghorn stones). A total of 13 patients presented a JJ stent (46.4%). We found a very significant difference in all the parameters favoring the Trilogy device. The most important result in our opinion is the probe active time, which was almost six times shorter in the Trilogy group. The stone clearance rate was about double in the Trilogy group, leading to shorter overall and intra-renal operating times. The overall complication rate was 17.9% in the Trilogy group and 23% in the Lithoclast Master group. The mean hemoglobin drop was 2.1 g/dL with a mean creatinine rise of 0.26 mg/dL. Conclusions: Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy, a device combining ultrasonic and ballistic energy, is a safe and efficient method of lithotripsy for PCNL, proving statistically significant benefits over its predecesor. It can achieve the goal of reducing complication rates and operative times for PCNL. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology in Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 230 KB  
Article
First Clinical Experience of a Novel Pulsed Solid-State Thulium:YAG Laser during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
by Julius Bergmann, Clemens Mathias Rosenbaum, Christopher Netsch, Andreas J. Gross and Benedikt Becker
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(7), 2588; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072588 - 29 Mar 2023
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3247
Abstract
Introduction: Laser lithotripsy during Mini-PCNL is one treatment option in urinary stone disease. In recent years, a new era in stone treatment has been initiated with the introduction of new pulsed thulium lasers. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety [...] Read more.
Introduction: Laser lithotripsy during Mini-PCNL is one treatment option in urinary stone disease. In recent years, a new era in stone treatment has been initiated with the introduction of new pulsed thulium lasers. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy with a new pulsed solid-state thulium:YAG laser during mini-PCNL. Materials and methods: All patients, regardless of stone size, who were treated with a Mini-PCNL using the new pulsed thulium laser were prospectively enrolled. Operation times, stone size, laser time, and laser settings were noted. The stone-free rate was assessed postoperatively with sonography and either X-ray or computed tomography as a clinical standard. The complications were analyzed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: A total of 50 patients with a mean age of 52 years were included. 31 (62 %) patients were male. The average stone size was 242.3 (±233.1) mm2 with an average density of 833 (±325) Hounsfield units. The mean operating time was 30.56 (±28.65) min, and the laser-on-time was 07:07 (± 07:08) min. The most commonly used settings were 0.4 J and 115 Hz (46 W). The mean total energy for stone ablation was 14,166 (±17,131) kJ. The total stone-free rate was 84 %, with an overall complication rate of 32% according to Clavien-Dindo (grade 1: n = 9, grade 2: n = 6, 3b: n = 1). In the group of patients with singular stones (n = 25), the stone-free rate was 88%. Summary: The new pulsed solid-state Thulium:YAG laser allows a safe and effective lithotripsy during Mini-PCNL. The stone-free rates were high regardless of stone size with a comparable low rate of complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery)
11 pages, 1355 KB  
Article
Mini-Perc for Renal Stones—A Single Center Experience and Literature Review
by Victor-Mihail Cauni, Mihai Dragutescu, Bogdan Mihai, Gabriel-Petre Gorecki, Liana Ples, Romina-Marina Sima and Cristian Persu
Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1083; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061083 - 13 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3380
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of miniaturized nephrolithotomy (mini-perc) in the management of renal stones with a diameter smaller than 20 mm. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 102 patients who underwent mini-perc between [...] Read more.
Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of miniaturized nephrolithotomy (mini-perc) in the management of renal stones with a diameter smaller than 20 mm. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 102 patients who underwent mini-perc between March 2015 and March 2020 in our department. The primary objective was the stone-free rate, but we also analyzed the retreatment rate, complications, hospital stay, operative time and reduction in hemoglobin level. All these patients had this technique as their first-line treatment, in a prone position, using a 16 Fr sheath size. Data were compared to a series of patients from the literature, treated with conventional PCNL. Results: The patients had calculus limited to either a single calyx or just extending to the renal pelvis, and stone size was less than 20 mm in its maximal dimension. The intrarenal stone location was in the upper calyx in 7 cases, middle calyx in 20 cases and lower calyx in 46 cases, and there were 29 patients with renal pelvis stone. The male to female ratio was 1.5:1, and the median age was 48.4 years. The average stone size was 17.4 mm in diameter (ranging between 9 and 20 mm) and all cases underwent Ho-YaG laser lithotripsy, ballistic energy and combined ultrasonic and ballistic lithotripsy. At the end of the procedure, an antegrade double J stent was placed under fluoroscopy for a maximum of 2 weeks in 42 cases, while 9 cases needed a nephrostomy tube 12–14 F. A total of 51 cases were totally tubeless. Our median operative time was 61 min (ranging from 35 to 75 min). The median hospitalization stay was 3.8 days. The stone free rate was 90.1% after one procedure, only nine (8.8%) cases needed a “second look” flexible ureteroscopy, and the final stone-free rate was 98% (absence of detectable calculi on ultrasound, KUB or non-contrast CT scan). The overall complication rate was 6.86% (Clavien classification I—57.14%; II—28.5%; III—14.2%), while no Clavien IV or V complications were reported. No patient required a blood transfusion, and mean hemoglobin loss was 0.81 mg/dL. Overall, our results are better than similar data for conventional PCNL in the literature. Conclusions: The “mini-perc” technique is an effective procedure for the treatment of the renal lithiasis that is less or equal to 2 cm. The results demonstrated that this minimally invasive technique is associated with a higher stone-free rate and minimal complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology in Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 252 KB  
Article
Validation of the Trifecta Scoring Metric in Vacuum-Assisted Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single-Center Experience
by Efrem Pozzi, Matteo Malfatto, Matteo Turetti, Carlo Silvani, Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello, Susanna Garbagnati, Gilda Galbiati, Stefano Paolo Zanetti, Fabrizio Longo, Elisa De Lorenzis, Giancarlo Albo, Andrea Salonia, Emanuele Montanari and Luca Boeri
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(22), 6788; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226788 - 16 Nov 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1747
Abstract
Background: Scoring metrics to assess and compare outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are needed. We aim to evaluate prevalence and predictors of trifecta in a cohort of patients treated with vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) for kidney stones. Methods: Data from 287 participants who [...] Read more.
Background: Scoring metrics to assess and compare outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are needed. We aim to evaluate prevalence and predictors of trifecta in a cohort of patients treated with vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) for kidney stones. Methods: Data from 287 participants who underwent vmPCNL were analysed. Patients’ and stones’ characteristics as well as operative data were collected. Stone-free was defined as no residual stones. The modified Clavien classification was used to score postoperative complications. Trifecta was defined as stone-free status without complications after a single session and no auxiliary procedures. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between predictors and trifecta outcome. Results: After vmPCNL, 219 (76.3%) patients were stone-free, and 81 (28.2%) had postoperative complications (any Clavien). Of 287, 170 (59.2%) patients achieved trifecta criteria. Patients who achieved trifecta status had smaller stone volume (p < 0.001), a higher rate of single stones (p < 0.001), shorter operative time (p < 0.01), and a higher rate of single percutaneous tract (p < 0.01) than −trifecta patients. Trifecta status decreased with the number of calyces involved, being 77.1%, 18.8%, and 4.1% in patients with 1, 2, or 3 calyces with stones, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that stone volume (OR 1.1, p = 0.02) and multiple calyces being involved (OR 2.8 and OR 4.3 for two- and three-calyceal groups, respectively, all p < 0.01) were independent unfavourable risk factors for trifecta after accounting for age, BMI, gender, operative time, and number of access tracts. Conclusions: Trifecta status was achieved in 6 out of 10 patients after vmPCNL. Stone distribution in multiple calyceal groups and stone volume were independent unfavourable risk factors for trifecta. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medical and Surgical Management of Urinary Tract Diseases)
9 pages, 560 KB  
Article
Totally X-ray-Free Ultrasound-Guided Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia Position: A Novel Combined Surgery
by Yi-Yang Liu, Yen-Ta Chen, Hao-Lun Luo, Yuan-Chi Shen, Chien-Hsu Chen, Yao-Chi Chuang, Ko-Wei Huang and Hung-Jen Wang
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(22), 6644; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226644 - 9 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2846
Abstract
We introduced a novel surgery that combines ultrasound guidance, miniaturization and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and evaluated the safety and efficacy. This retrospective, single-center study retrospectively reviewed 150 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided mini-PCNL in the GMSV position from [...] Read more.
We introduced a novel surgery that combines ultrasound guidance, miniaturization and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and evaluated the safety and efficacy. This retrospective, single-center study retrospectively reviewed 150 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided mini-PCNL in the GMSV position from November 2019 to March 2022. All perioperative parameters were collected. Stone-free status was defined as no residual stones or clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) <0.4 cm on postoperative day one. Among the 150 patients, the mean age was 56.96 years. The mean stone size was 3.19 cm (427 mm2). The mean S.T.O.N.E. score was 7.61, including 36 patients (24%) with scores ≥9. The mean operative time was 66.22 min, and the success rate of renal access creation in the first attempt was 88.7%. One hundred and forty (93.3%) patients were stone free. The mean decrease in Hemoglobin was 1.04 g/dL, and no patient needed a blood transfusion. Complications included transient hematuria (n = 13, 8.7%), bladder blood clot retention (n = 2, 1.3%), fever (n = 15, 10%) and sepsis (n = 2, 1.3%). Totally X-ray-free ultrasound-guided mini-PCNL in the GMSV position is feasible, safe and effective for patients with upper urinary tract stones, indicating the synergistic and complementary effects of the three novel techniques. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3789 KB  
Review
Comparison of Ultra-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from the KSER Update Series
by Hae Do Jung, Doo Yong Chung, Do Kyung Kim, Min Ho Lee, Sin Woo Lee, Sunghyun Paick, Seung Hyun Jeon, Joo Yong Lee and on behalf of the Korean Society of Endourology and Robotics (KSER) Research Committee
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(6), 1529; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061529 - 10 Mar 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4135
Abstract
Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones have been developed to overcome the invasive disadvantages of PCNL. We aimed to compare the therapeutic effect and safety of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMPCNL) and RIRS for renal stones using an [...] Read more.
Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones have been developed to overcome the invasive disadvantages of PCNL. We aimed to compare the therapeutic effect and safety of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMPCNL) and RIRS for renal stones using an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched clinical trials comparing UMPCNL and RIRS for renal stones using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases up to October 2021. Seven studies were included in the current study. The renal stone size was 10–20 mm in three studies, 10–25 mm in one study, 10–35 mm in two studies, and not specified in one study. The stone-free rate of UMPCNL was higher than that of RIRS (p = 0.02; odds ratio (OR) = 2.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12, 3.61). The complication rate showed no significant difference between UMPCNL and RIRS (p = 0.48; OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 0.73, 1.98). Regarding the operative time, UMPCNL was shorter than RIRS (p = 0.005; weighted mean difference (WMD) = −15.63; 95% CI = −26.60, −4.67). The hospital stay of UMPCNL was longer than that of RIRS (p = 0.0004; WMD = 1.48; 95% CI = 0.66, 2.31). UMPCNL showed higher efficacy than RIRS and similar safety to RIRS. UMPCNL may be a useful therapeutic option for moderate-sized renal stones. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop