Search Results (3)

People with severe mental disorders (SMD) face long-term functional impairments requiring integrated, community-based, recovery-oriented care. Italy provides two main housing models for people with SMD: private accommodation (PA) and supported accommodation (SA). This exploratory study investigated differences in recovery outcomes across these settings using the Mental Health Recovery Star (MHRS). A six-month longitudinal study was conducted within the South Verona Community Mental Health Service. Nineteen trained mental health professionals assessed 25 people with SMD (14 in PA, 11 in SA) at baseline (BL) and follow-up (FU) using standardized tools for recovery (MHRS), functioning, psychopathology, functional autonomy, and needs. Group comparisons and within-group changes were analyzed using paired and independent t-tests. At BL, people with SMD in PA showed better functioning (p = 0.040) and fewer needs than those in SA (p = 0.008). Recovery goals differed, with people with SMD in PA focusing on health and networks, while people with SMD in SA emphasized functioning. At FU, people with SMD in PA improved across all MHRS domains (p < 0.001), with significant reductions in symptom severity and unmet needs. People with SMD in SA showed targeted improvements in functioning, autonomy, and MHRS social networks (p < 0.001), with increases in met needs but non-significant changes in unmet needs. When comparing PA and SA at FU, the differences were relatively modest. Recovery is achievable in both housing settings, although outcomes differ. People with SMD in PA experienced broader improvements, while people with SMD in SA progressed in their prioritized areas, likely reflecting more complex initial needs. These findings underscore the value of aligning recovery-oriented care with the specific needs and contexts of different residential settings. Further research is needed to confirm and expand these results. Full article

Background: Over the past decade, Italy has made progress in adopting recovery-oriented approaches in mental health care, though full alignment with international guidelines remains incomplete. This study investigates the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of integrating recovery-oriented practices in an Italian Community Mental Health Service (CMHS), focusing on both user and professional perspectives to identify strengths and areas for improvement. Methods: A longitudinal pilot study was conducted at the South Verona CMHS. Data on users’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, symptoms, functioning, needs, and autonomy were collected at baseline and six-month follow-up. Participants included individuals in supported accommodation and outpatient care. The Mental Health Recovery Star (MHRS) assessed recovery progress. Qualitative data from focus groups and interviews captured users’ and professionals’ experiences. Results: Nineteen professionals completed the MHRS with 25 users, who demonstrated significant improvements in MHRS scores (p = 0.003), romantic relationships (p < 0.001), employment (p < 0.001), functioning (p = 0.015), psychopathology (p = 0.001), functional autonomy (p = 0.003), and unmet needs (p = 0.026). Qualitative findings emphasized the value of a personalized, holistic approach but noted gaps in follow-up and shared decision-making. Focus groups (30 participants) highlighted recovery as a process of hope, meaning, and empowerment. Participants called for ongoing education, structural changes, and peer-support initiatives. Professionals reported increased motivation. Conclusions: Integrating recovery-oriented practices within the South Verona CMHS was both feasible and acceptable. The MHRS positively impacted service users’ personal recovery and professionals’ motivation. The study underscores the need for continued training, structural reforms, and peer-support initiatives to foster lasting changes and enhance CMHS practices. Full article

To meet the increasingly complex needs of mental health consumers, it is essential for multidisciplinary clinicians to have capabilities across a range of psychosocial interventions. Despite this, there is scant evidence investigating the existing levels of knowledge and skills of specialties within multidisciplinary mental health teams. The purpose of this paper was to describe the self-reported capabilities of mental health clinicians, and to provide a rationale for the Psychosocial Interventions Framework Assessment (PIFA), which aims to enhance the access to, and quality of, evidence-informed practice for consumers of mental health services (MHSs) by strengthening workforce capabilities and leadership for psychosocial therapies. Using the Delphi method, the team developed a 75-item survey based on the 10-point Mental Health Recovery Star (MHRS). Participants completed a self-administered survey indicating their perceived capabilities in the PIFA items. The findings revealed lower-than-expected average scores between ‘novice’ and ‘proficient’, highlighting the need for further development of specific training and education modules for individual teams. This is the first framework of its nature to use the Recovery Star^TM to determine the psychosocial areas and domains for the assessment of practitioners’ strengths and needs for skill development. Full article