Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = lncBNIP3

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 1882 KB  
Review
Epigenetic Drivers of Chemoresistance in Nucleobase and Nucleoside Analog Therapies
by John Kaszycki and Minji Kim
Biology 2025, 14(7), 838; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070838 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1224
Abstract
Nucleobase and nucleoside analogs are critical components of antimetabolite chemotherapy treatments used to disrupt DNA replication and induce apoptosis in rapidly proliferating cancer cells. However, the development of resistance to these agents remains a major clinical challenge. This review explores the epigenetic mechanisms [...] Read more.
Nucleobase and nucleoside analogs are critical components of antimetabolite chemotherapy treatments used to disrupt DNA replication and induce apoptosis in rapidly proliferating cancer cells. However, the development of resistance to these agents remains a major clinical challenge. This review explores the epigenetic mechanisms that contribute to acquired chemoresistance, focusing on DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). These epigenetic alterations regulate key processes such as DNA repair, drug metabolism, cell transport, and autophagy, enabling cancer cells to survive and resist therapeutic pressure. We highlight how dysregulation of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and histone acetyltransferases (HATs) modulates expression of transporters (e.g., hENT1, ABCB1), DNA repair enzymes (e.g., Polβ, BRCA1/2), and autophagy-related genes (e.g., CSNK2A1, BNIP3). Furthermore, emerging roles for long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) in regulating nucleoside export and DNA damage response pathways underscore their relevance as therapeutic targets. The interplay of these epigenetic modifications drives resistance to agents such as gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil across multiple tumor types. We also discuss recent progress in therapeutic interventions, including DNMT and HDAC inhibitors, RNA-based therapeutics, and CRISPR-based epigenome editing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 17708 KB  
Article
Long Non-Coding RNA BNIP3 Inhibited the Proliferation of Bovine Intramuscular Preadipocytes via Cell Cycle
by Wenzhen Zhang, Jianfang Wang, Bingzhi Li, Bing Sun, Shengchen Yu, Xiaoyu Wang and Linsen Zan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(4), 4234; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044234 - 20 Feb 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3087
Abstract
The intramuscular fat (or marbling fat) content is an essential economic trait of beef cattle and improves the flavor and palatability of meat. Several studies have highlighted the correlation between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and intramuscular fat development; however, the precise molecular mechanism [...] Read more.
The intramuscular fat (or marbling fat) content is an essential economic trait of beef cattle and improves the flavor and palatability of meat. Several studies have highlighted the correlation between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and intramuscular fat development; however, the precise molecular mechanism remains unknown. Previously, through a high-throughput sequencing analysis, we found a lncRNA and named it a long non-coding RNA BNIP3 (lncBNIP3). The 5′ RACE and 3′ RACE explored 1945 bp total length of lncBNIP3, including 1621 bp of 5′RACE, and 464 bp of 3′RACE. The nucleoplasmic separation and FISH results explored the nuclear localization of lncBNIP3. Moreover, the tissue expression of lncBNIP3 was higher in the longissimus dorsi muscle, followed by intramuscular fat. Furthermore, down-regulation of lncBNIP3 increased the 5-Ethynyl-2′- deoxyuridine (EdU)-EdU-positive cells. The flow cytometry results showed that the number of cells in the S phase was significantly higher in preadipocytes transfected with si-lncBNIP3 than in the control group (si-NC). Similarly, CCK8 results showed that the number of cells after transfection of si-lncBNIP3 was significantly higher than in the control group. In addition, the mRNA expressions of proliferative marker genes CyclinB1 (CCNB1) and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) in the si-lncBNIP3 group were significantly higher than in the control group. The Western Blot (WB) results also showed that the protein expression level of PCNA transfection of si-lncBNIP3 was significantly higher than in the control group. Similarly, the enrichment of lncBNIP3 significantly decreased the EdU-positive cells in the bovine preadipocytes. The results of flow cytometry and CCK8 assay also showed that overexpression of lncBNIP3 inhibited the proliferation of bovine preadipocytes. In addition, the overexpression of lncBNIP3 significantly inhibited the mRNA expressions of CCNB1 and PCNA. The WB results showed that the overexpression of lncBNIP3 significantly inhibited the expression of the CCNB1 protein level. To further explore the mechanism of lncBNIP3 on the proliferation of intramuscular preadipocytes, RNA-seq was performed after interference with si-lncBNIP3, and 660 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found, including 417 up-regulated DEGs and 243 down-regulated DEGs. The KEGG pathway analysis showed that the cell cycle was the most significant pathway for the functional enrichment of DEGs, followed by the DNA replication pathway. The RT-qPCR quantified the expression of twenty DEGs in the cell cycle. Therefore, we speculated that lncBNIP3 regulated intramuscular preadipocyte proliferation through the cell cycle and DNA replication pathways. To further confirm this hypothesis, the cell cycle inhibitor Ara-C was used to inhibit DNA replication of the S phase in intramuscular preadipocytes. Herein, Ara-C and si-lncBNIP3 were simultaneously added to the preadipocytes, and the CCK8, flow cytometry, and EdU assays were performed. The results showed that the si-lncBNIP3 could rescue the inhibitory effect of Ara-C in the bovine preadipocyte proliferation. In addition, lncBNIP3 could bind to the promoter of cell division control protein 6 (CDC6), and down-regulation of lncBNIP3 promoted the transcription activity and the expression of CDC6. Therefore, the inhibitory effect of lncBNIP3 on cell proliferation might be understood through the cell cycle pathway and CDC6 expression. This study provided a valuable lncRNA with functional roles in intramuscular fat accumulation and revealed new strategies for improving beef quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Function and Regulation Mechanism of ncRNAs in Adipogenesis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop