Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = light of sight error, FOG

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 4106 KiB  
Article
Machine Learning-Based Beam Pointing Error Reduction for Satellite–Ground FSO Links
by Nilesh Maharjan and Byung Wook Kim
Electronics 2024, 13(17), 3466; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13173466 - 31 Aug 2024
Viewed by 2448
Abstract
Free space optical (FSO) communication, which has the potential to meet the demand for high-data-rate communications between satellites and ground stations, requires accurate alignment between the transmitter and receiver to establish a line-of-sight channel link. In this paper, we propose a machine learning [...] Read more.
Free space optical (FSO) communication, which has the potential to meet the demand for high-data-rate communications between satellites and ground stations, requires accurate alignment between the transmitter and receiver to establish a line-of-sight channel link. In this paper, we propose a machine learning (ML)-based approach to reduce beam pointing errors in FSO satellite-to-ground communications subjected to satellite vibration and weak atmospheric turbulence. ML models are utilized to find the optimal gain, which plays a crucial role in reducing pointing error displacement in a closed-loop FSO system. In designing the FSO environment, we employ several system model parameters, including control and system matrix components of the transmitter and receiver, noise parameters for the optical channel, irradiance, and the scintillation index of the signal. To predict the gain matrix of the closed-loop system, ML methods, such as tree-based algorithms, and a 1D convolutional neural network (Conv1D) are applied. Experimental results show that the Conv1D model outperforms other ML methods in gain value prediction, helping to maintain the beam position centered on the receiver aperture, minimizing beam pointing errors. When constructing a closed-loop system based on the Conv1D model, the error variance of the pointing error displacement was obtained as 0.012 and 0.015 in clear weather and light fog conditions, respectively. In addition, this research analyzes the impact of input features in a closed-loop FSO system, and compares the pointing error performance of the closed-loop setup to the conventional open-loop setup under weak turbulence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Machine Learning and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2304 KiB  
Article
Combining Charge Couple Devices and Rate Sensors for the Feedforward Control System of a Charge Coupled Device Tracking Loop
by Tao Tang, Jing Tian, Daijun Zhong and Chengyu Fu
Sensors 2016, 16(7), 968; https://doi.org/10.3390/s16070968 - 25 Jun 2016
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 5109
Abstract
A rate feed forward control-based sensor fusion is proposed to improve the closed-loop performance for a charge couple device (CCD) tracking loop. The target trajectory is recovered by combining line of sight (LOS) errors from the CCD and the angular rate from a [...] Read more.
A rate feed forward control-based sensor fusion is proposed to improve the closed-loop performance for a charge couple device (CCD) tracking loop. The target trajectory is recovered by combining line of sight (LOS) errors from the CCD and the angular rate from a fiber-optic gyroscope (FOG). A Kalman filter based on the Singer acceleration model utilizes the reconstructive target trajectory to estimate the target velocity. Different from classical feed forward control, additive feedback loops are inevitably added to the original control loops due to the fact some closed-loop information is used. The transfer function of the Kalman filter in the frequency domain is built for analyzing the closed loop stability. The bandwidth of the Kalman filter is the major factor affecting the control stability and close-loop performance. Both simulations and experiments are provided to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed algorithm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop