Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = leached GNF

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 7675 KiB  
Article
Treatment and Recycle of Greenhouse Nutrient Feed Water Applying Hydrochar and Activated Carbon Followed by Reverse Osmosis
by Abu-Taher Jamal-Uddin, Takashi Matsuura, Fadi Al-Daoud and Richard G. Zytner
Water 2022, 14(21), 3573; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213573 - 7 Nov 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3003
Abstract
Leached greenhouse nutrient feed (GNF) water is a great challenge for greenhouse (GH) producers. Unbalanced higher micronutrient metal’s phytotoxicity impact GH plant growth, and the high phosphorous levels can cause lake eutrophication if not treated. The analytical results of three GNFs revealed no [...] Read more.
Leached greenhouse nutrient feed (GNF) water is a great challenge for greenhouse (GH) producers. Unbalanced higher micronutrient metal’s phytotoxicity impact GH plant growth, and the high phosphorous levels can cause lake eutrophication if not treated. The analytical results of three GNFs revealed no microbial contamination in any of the GNFs, but the potassium, calcium, magnesium levels, and pH range were above the target level for root zone conditions. Both higher and lower limit concentrations are phytotoxic, causing poor or non-developed roots, leaves, and stems. Sodium was also not in the balanced range. Phosphate and nitrate nutrients were above the measurable range, showing that it would be a threat to lake eutrophication if disposed of. Due to uptake by plants at varied rates, nutrient ion imbalance in GNF is usual, but proper control or treatment is essential as GNF is not a waste but a resource providing fertilization to plants. Potential treatment options investigated include coagulation filtration, sorption with hydrochar (HC), and activated carbon (AC), followed by reverse osmosis (RO) membrane filtration. The HC and AC were produced from waste tomato plants biomass (TPB) of the same GHs to enhance the recycle–reuse of wastes. Neither metals nor nutrient concentrations were reduced to the desired levels by coagulation treatments. The HC and AC treatment provided the recycle–reuse possibility of GNF. RO membrane filtration provided about 97–99% reduction of metals and 99% reduction of nutrients, allowing GNF preparation by adding new fertilizer to the RO permeate. In such a case, the RO reject needs to be reused as feed for TPB carbonization. Different options for GHs to manage TPB and GNF are provided. As RO is an energy-expensive process, an assessment of technical know-how to provide an energy economic process is demonstrated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Quality for Sustainable Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3008 KiB  
Article
Hydrothermal Conversion of Waste Biomass from Greenhouses into Hydrochar for Energy, Soil Amendment, and Wastewater Treatment Applications
by Abu-Taher Jamal-Uddin, Shakirudeen A. Salaudeen, Animesh Dutta and Richard G. Zytner
Energies 2022, 15(10), 3663; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103663 - 17 May 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2801
Abstract
Solid hydrochar (HC) produced by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of tomato plant biomass from a greenhouse (GH) was assessed for different inhouse applications, including fuel, seed germination, and leached GH nutrient feed (GNF) wastewater treatment. Completed experiments showed encouraging results. HC was revealed to [...] Read more.
Solid hydrochar (HC) produced by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of tomato plant biomass from a greenhouse (GH) was assessed for different inhouse applications, including fuel, seed germination, and leached GH nutrient feed (GNF) wastewater treatment. Completed experiments showed encouraging results. HC was revealed to be an efficient renewable fuel, having peat-like characteristics with high heating value of about 26.0 MJ/kg and very low clinker forming potential. This would allow the use of HC as fuel for GH heating as a substitute to costly natural gas, or it could be commercialized after pelletizing. Experiments with soil application showed substantial potential for the produced HC in better seed germination of tomato plants. Another benefit from use of the produced HC is as a soil additive, which would also contribute to environmental emission reduction. Results suggest that the generated HC can remove about 6–30% of nutrients from leached-GNF wastewater. This would be an essential treatment in the reduction of nutrients from leached water from GH operations, and thus could prevent/reduce eutrophication. The exhausted HC after treatment application could then be reused for soil remediation. Overall, the paper highlights the potential applications of hydrothermal treatment in valorization of low-valued GH TPB waste, resulting in a circular economy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbonization of Biomass for Energy Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop