Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = inverse Wibull distribution

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 741 KiB  
Article
Fuzzy vs. Traditional Reliability Model for Inverse Weibull Distribution
by Eslam Hussam, Mohamed A. Sabry, M. M. Abd El-Raouf and Ehab M. Almetwally
Axioms 2023, 12(6), 582; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12060582 - 12 Jun 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1737
Abstract
In this paper, fuzzy stress strengths RF=P(YX) and traditional stress strengths R=P(Y<X) are considered and compared when X and Y are independently inverse Weibull random variables. When axiomatic [...] Read more.
In this paper, fuzzy stress strengths RF=P(YX) and traditional stress strengths R=P(Y<X) are considered and compared when X and Y are independently inverse Weibull random variables. When axiomatic fuzzy set theory is taken into account in the stress–strength inference, it enables the generation of more precise studies on the underlying systems. We discuss estimating both conventional and fuzzy models of stress strength utilizing a maximum product of spacing, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Simulations based on the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method are used to produce various estimators of conventional and fuzzy dependability of stress strength for the inverse Weibull model. To generate both conventional and fuzzy models of dependability, we use the Metropolis–Hastings method while performing Bayesian estimation. In conclusion, we will examine a scenario taken from actual life and apply a real-world data application to validate the accuracy of the provided estimators. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop