Search Results (1)

Background/Objectives: The iBreast Exam (iBE) electronically palpates the breast to identify possible abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to assess iBE feasibility and compare it to Clinical Breast Exam (CBE) for breast lesion detection. Methods: Prospective evaluation of 300 asymptomatic women, ≥18 years old, with CBE, iBE, and mammography was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of iBE and CBE for detecting suspicious breast lesions were calculated using breast imaging as the reference standard. For women with one year follow up, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for cancer detection were calculated. Results: 300 women (mean age 58.9 years) underwent CBE, iBE, and mammography. In 2/300 (0.7%), CBE was positive; in 1/300 (0.3%), iBE was positive; and in 24/300 (8%), screening mammograms were positive. Nine had suspicious imaging findings with biopsy (three malignant and six benign). Of three cancers, all visualized mammographically, CBE and iBE detected an ipsilateral breast abnormality in one woman and missed two cancers (<2 cm). Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of iBE and CBE were similar, with no statistically significant difference in NPV or PPV for detection of suspicious breast findings or breast cancer (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Mammography detected all breast cancers in our cohort and remains the standard of care. iBE is feasible to perform. Our pilot data demonstrates iBE performed similarly to CBE by trained nurse practitioners. Given our small study population, further investigation is warranted into the potential use of iBE where trained healthcare practitioners are not readily available. Full article