Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = feldspar silane

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 2138 KiB  
Article
Comparison Between Bond Strengths of a Resin Cement on Traditional Prosthetic Substrates and a 3D-Printed Resin for Permanent Restorations
by Alessandro Vichi, Hanan Al-Johani, Dario Balestra and Chris Louca
Coatings 2025, 15(8), 896; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15080896 (registering DOI) - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 230
Abstract
Recently, 3D-printed resins have been introduced as materials for definitive indirect restorations. Herein, a comparative assessment of the bond strengths of 3D-printed resins to a resin cement was performed. Methods: four definitive restorative materials were selected, i.e., a Feldspar ceramic (VITA Mark II, [...] Read more.
Recently, 3D-printed resins have been introduced as materials for definitive indirect restorations. Herein, a comparative assessment of the bond strengths of 3D-printed resins to a resin cement was performed. Methods: four definitive restorative materials were selected, i.e., a Feldspar ceramic (VITA Mark II, VM), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (VITA Enamic, VE), a nanohybrid resin composite (Grandio Bloc, GB), and one 3D-printed resin (Crown Permanent, CP). VM and VE were etched and silanized, GB was sandblasted, and CP was glass bead blasted; for one further experimental group, this was followed by sandblasting (CPs). A resin cement (RelyX Unicem) was then used for bonding, and then a notched shear bond strength test (nSBS) was performed. Failure modes were observed and classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed, and SEM representative images were taken. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA, Tukey, and Chi-square tests. Significant differences were detected in nSBS among materials (p < 0.001). The highest nSBS was found in VM (30.3 ± 1.8 MPa) a, followed by CPb, GBbc, CPbc, and VEc. Failure modes were significantly different (p < 0.001), and with different prevalent failure modes. The bond strength for 3D-printed permanent resin materials was shown to be lower than that of the felspathic ceramic but comparable to that of the resin block and PICN substrates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymer Coatings: Materials, Methods, and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 7618 KiB  
Article
Effect of Filler Type, Content, and Silanization on the Flexural Strength, Elastic Modulus, Shore D Hardness, and Two-Body Wear of PAEK Compounds
by Felix Schmeiser, Wofgang Schramm, Felicitas Mayinger, Uwe Baumert and Bogna Stawarczyk
Materials 2025, 18(12), 2736; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122736 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 404
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of filler type, filler content, and filler silanization on the flexural strength (FX), elastic modulus (Em), shore D hardness (SDH), and two-body wear (2BW) of polyaryletherketone (PAEK) compounds. Specimens (40 wt% [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of filler type, filler content, and filler silanization on the flexural strength (FX), elastic modulus (Em), shore D hardness (SDH), and two-body wear (2BW) of polyaryletherketone (PAEK) compounds. Specimens (40 wt% PEEK, 40 wt% PEK) with different filler types: 20 wt%: fumed silica (FS), calcium silicate (CS), feldspar (FP), magnesium silicate hydrate (MSH), no filler (NF); different filler content: 20, 25 or 30 wt% CS; different filler silanization: 20 wt% CS silanized with alkylsilane/aminosilane, FP silanized with methylsilane/ vinylsilane, no silanization; and PEEK20 (BioHPP) or PEEK25 (BioHPP plus) controls were fabricated and tested for FX, Em, and SDH. Two-body wear (4 × 100,000 cycles, 50 N, 2.5 Hz) with composite resin antagonists was measured with PAEKi (35 wt% PEEK, 35 wt% PEK, 30 wt% CS), PAEKii (70 wt% PEEK, 30 wt% CS), PAEKiii (70 wt% PEEK, 25 wt% CS, 5 wt% FP), and PEEK20 controls. Data were analyzed with Kolmogorov–Smirnov-, Kruskal–Wallis-H-, post hoc Scheffé test, pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni correction, one-way ANOVA, and Spearman rho (α = 0.05). An abrasion area analysis was performed. Adding filler increased FX, Em, and SDH, with CS and MSH showing the highest values for FX and Em. Adding 30 wt% CS increased FX, Em, and SDH compared with 20 wt%. Silanization with methylsilane increased FX, Em, and SDH. Silanization with aminosilane increased FX and SDH. PEEK20 showed the lowest 2BW compared with all EPCs. No material losses were detected on the antagonists. PAEK compounds with 25 to 30 wt% CS increased FX and Em compared to lower contents, no filler, or PEEK20. Higher values of FX and Em did not lead to lower 2BW. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Composites)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3674 KiB  
Article
Feldspar-Modified Methacrylic Composite for Fabrication of Prosthetic Teeth
by Zbigniew Raszewski, Julita Kulbacka, Daria Pakuła, Dariusz Brząkalski and Robert E. Przekop
Materials 2023, 16(10), 3674; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103674 - 11 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1849
Abstract
This study was aimed at investigating poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), modified with a silanized feldspar filler at 10 wt.% and 30 wt.%, as a dental material system for the production of prosthetic teeth. Samples of this composite were subjected to a compressive strength test, [...] Read more.
This study was aimed at investigating poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), modified with a silanized feldspar filler at 10 wt.% and 30 wt.%, as a dental material system for the production of prosthetic teeth. Samples of this composite were subjected to a compressive strength test, three-layer methacrylic teeth were fabricated with the said materials, and their connection to a denture plate was examined. The biocompatibility of the materials was assessed via cytotoxicity tests on human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) and Chinese hamster ovarian cells (CHO-K1). The addition of feldspar significantly improved the material’s compressive strength, with neat PMMA reaching 107 MPa, and the addition of 30% feldspar raising it up to 159 MPa. As observed, composite teeth (cervical part made of neat PMMA, dentin with 10 wt.%, and enamel with 30 wt.% of feldspar) had good adhesion to the denture plate. Neither of the tested materials revealed any cytotoxic effects. In the case of hamster fibroblasts, increased cell viability was observed, with only morphological changes being noticed. Samples containing 10% or 30% of inorganic filler were determined to be safe for treated cells. The use of silanized feldspar to fabricate composite teeth increased their hardness, which is of significant clinical importance for the duration of use of non-retained dentures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers Research in Novel Dental Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 7085 KiB  
Article
Influence of the Application Time of Silane for the Bonding Performance between Feldspar or Lithium Disilicate Ceramics and Luting Resin Composites
by Florian Fuchs, Sina Maria Westerhove, Leonie Schmohl, Andreas Koenig, Rujito Sesariojiwandono Ridho Suharbiansah, Sebastian Hahnel and Angelika Rauch
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14(4), 231; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14040231 - 19 Apr 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3170
Abstract
A correct silanization time is essential for successful surface functionalization and sufficient bonding to dental ceramics. The shear bond strength (SBS) of lithium disilicate (LDS) and feldspar (FSC) ceramics and luting resin composite was investigated with respect to different silanization times, taking into [...] Read more.
A correct silanization time is essential for successful surface functionalization and sufficient bonding to dental ceramics. The shear bond strength (SBS) of lithium disilicate (LDS) and feldspar (FSC) ceramics and luting resin composite was investigated with respect to different silanization times, taking into account the physical properties of the individual surfaces. The SBS test was performed with a universal testing machine, and the fracture surfaces were evaluated by stereomicroscopy. The surface roughness of the prepared specimens was analyzed after etching. Changes in surface properties due to surface functionalization were evaluated by surface free energy (SFE) via contact angle measurement. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to determine the chemical binding. The roughness and SBS of the control group (no silane, etched) were higher for FSC than for LDS. Regarding the SFE, the dispersive fraction increased and the polar fraction decreased after silanization. FTIR confirmed the presence of silane on the surfaces. The SBS of LDS showed a significant increase from 5 to 15 s, depending on the silane and luting resin composite. For FSC, cohesive failure was observed for all samples. For LDS specimens, a silane application time of 15 to 60 s is recommended. Based on clinical conditions, no difference between the silanization times was observed for FSC specimens, indicating that etching alone produces sufficient bonding. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop