Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = eligibility criteria of IMbrave150

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 12584 KiB  
Article
Efficacy and Effect on Liver Functional Reserve of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Who Do Not Meet Eligibility Criteria of IMbrave150
by Takuya Sho, Goki Suda, Yoshiya Yamamoto, Ken Furuya, Masaru Baba, Koji Ogawa, Akinori Kubo, Yoshimasa Tokuchi, Qingjie Fu, Zijian Yang, Megumi Kimura, Takashi Kitagataya, Osamu Maehara, Shunsuke Ohnishi, Akihisa Nakamura, Ren Yamada, Masatsugu Ohara, Naoki Kawagishi, Mitsuteru Natsuizaka, Masato Nakai, Kazuharu Suzuki, Takaaki Izumi, Takashi Meguro, Katsumi Terashita, Tomofumi Takagi, Jun Ito, Tomoe Kobayashi, Takuto Miyagishima and Naoya Sakamotoadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2022, 14(16), 3938; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163938 - 15 Aug 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3213
Abstract
The IMbrave150 trial demonstrated the high efficacy and safety of atezolizumab and bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this multicenter study, the efficacy of this combination and its effect on liver functional reserve were evaluated in patients not meeting the eligibility criteria [...] Read more.
The IMbrave150 trial demonstrated the high efficacy and safety of atezolizumab and bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this multicenter study, the efficacy of this combination and its effect on liver functional reserve were evaluated in patients not meeting the eligibility criteria of IMbrave150. Of 115 patients with unresectable HCC treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab between October 2020 and January 2022, 72 did not meet the eligibility criteria of IMbrave150, most frequently due to a history of systemic therapy (60/72), platelet counts < 75 × 109/L (7/72), Child-Pugh B (9/72), and 2+ proteinuria (8/72). Atezolizumab and bevacizumab therapy was equally effective for patients who did or did not meet the eligibility criteria (PFS, 6.5 vs. 6.9 months, p = 0.765), consistent with subgroup analyses of histories of systemic therapy, platelet counts, Child-Pugh, and proteinuria. Baseline ALBI scores were worse in patients who did not meet the criteria than in those who did and significantly worsened after treatment initiation in patients not meeting the criteria (baseline vs. 12 weeks; 2.35 ± 0.43 vs. −2.18 ± 0.54; p = 0.007). Accordingly, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was effective for patients not meeting the eligibility criteria of IMbrave150, although careful monitoring for changes in liver functional reserve is needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights of Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop