Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = curve seeding compensation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 2927 KiB  
Article
Precision Seeding Compensation and Positioning Based on Multisensors
by Jiaze Sun, Yan Zhang, Yuting Zhang, Peize Li and Guifa Teng
Sensors 2022, 22(19), 7228; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197228 - 23 Sep 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2061
Abstract
The current multi-row planter always leads to uneven seeding spacing between rows while seeding in curve paths, which causes uneven growth, a cost increase of production and management, and reduced yield. With the development of smart farming technology, a curve seeding compensation and [...] Read more.
The current multi-row planter always leads to uneven seeding spacing between rows while seeding in curve paths, which causes uneven growth, a cost increase of production and management, and reduced yield. With the development of smart farming technology, a curve seeding compensation and precise positioning model is proposed in the paper to calculate the real-time speed and position of each seeding unit based on the information from multisensors, such as GNSS and IMU, and to predict the next seeding position to achieve uniform seeding on the curve and improve the unit yield of crops. MATLAB Simulink simulation experiments show that the seeding pass rate of the model is 99.97% when the positioning accuracy is ±0.01 m and the traction speed is 1 m/s, and the seeding pass rate of the five-row seeder is as high as 99.81% when the traction speed is 3 m/s, which verifies the effectiveness and practicality of the model. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2975 KiB  
Article
Reciprocal Common Garden Altitudinal Transplants Reveal Potential Negative Impacts of Climate Change on Abies religiosa Populations in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve Overwintering Sites
by Ana Laura Cruzado-Vargas, Arnulfo Blanco-García, Roberto Lindig-Cisneros, Mariela Gómez-Romero, Leonel Lopez-Toledo, Erick de la Barrera and Cuauhtémoc Sáenz-Romero
Forests 2021, 12(1), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12010069 - 9 Jan 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3983 | Correction
Abstract
Research Highlights: Reciprocal altitudinal transplants of Abies religiosa seedlings within the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve (MBBR) allow prediction of the impacts of climatic change, because they grow in sites with a climate that differs from that of their origin. Background and Objectives: Climatic [...] Read more.
Research Highlights: Reciprocal altitudinal transplants of Abies religiosa seedlings within the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve (MBBR) allow prediction of the impacts of climatic change, because they grow in sites with a climate that differs from that of their origin. Background and Objectives: Climatic change is generating a mismatch between the sites currently occupied by forest populations and the climate to which they have adapted. This study determined the effect on the survival and growth of A. religiosa seedlings of transfer to sites that were warmer or colder than that of the origin of their seeds. Materials and Methods: Eleven provenances of A. religiosa, collected along an altitudinal gradient (3000 to 3550 m a.s.l.), were assayed in common gardens in three sites of contrasting altitude: 3400, 3000 and 2600 m a.s.l. The results were evaluated by fitting a response curve with a mixed model. Results: The climate transfer distance for the seasonal balance between the temperature conducive to growth (degree days above 5 °C) and the available precipitation (a ratio expressed as dryness index) dominated the shape of the response function curve. The rainy season (June–October) dryness index transfer distance was critical for survival, while that of the cold and dry season (November–February) was critical for aerial biomass, and the annual index was critical for the increase in basal diameter. The effect of climatic transfer distance is much more negative (triggering about 45% mortality) when transfer is toward warmer and dryer sites (at 400 m lower in altitude, +1.9 °C warmer and 16% less precipitation), than when shifting toward colder and wetter sites (400 m higher in altitude, resulting in 95% survival). Conclusions: The projected higher temperatures and lower precipitation due to climatic change will undoubtedly cause severe mortality in young A. religiosa seedlings. A 400 m shift upwards in altitude to compensate for climatic change (assisted migration) appears to be a feasible management action. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 1103 KiB  
Article
Effect of Sowing Method and N Application on Seed Yield and N Use Efficiency of Winter Oilseed Rape
by Klaus Sieling, Ulf Böttcher and Henning Kage
Agronomy 2017, 7(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7010021 - 28 Feb 2017
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 6624
Abstract
In northern Europe, replacing winter barley with winter wheat as the preceding crop for winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.; WOSR) often results in a delayed WOSR sowing and poor autumn growth. Based on data from a field experiment running in 2009/2010, [...] Read more.
In northern Europe, replacing winter barley with winter wheat as the preceding crop for winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.; WOSR) often results in a delayed WOSR sowing and poor autumn growth. Based on data from a field experiment running in 2009/2010, 2010/2011, and 2012/2013, this study aims (i) to investigate how a delayed sowing method affects seed yield, N offtake with the seeds, and apparent N use efficiency (NUE) of WOSR; (ii) to test the ability of autumn and spring N fertilization to compensate for the negative effects of a delayed sowing method; and (iii) to estimate the minimum autumnal growth for optimal seed yield. In order to create sufficiently differentiated canopies, a combination of four sowing methods (first week of August until the third week of September) and four autumn N treatments (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg·N·ha−1) was established. Each of these 16 different canopies was fertilized with 5 N amounts (0/0, 40/40, 80/80, 120/120, 140/140 kg·N·ha−1) in spring in order to estimate separate N response curves. Above-ground N accumulation in autumn and seed yield and N offtake by the seeds were determined. Plant establishment after mid-September significantly decreased seed yield. Autumn N fertilization of at least 30 kg·N·ha−1 increased seed yield and N offtake by the seeds without any significant interaction with sowing method and spring N supply. However, the pathway(s) remain(s) unclear. Spring N fertilization up to 130 kg·N·ha−1 (estimated by a Linear-Plateau N response curve) increased seed yield. NUE decreased with increasing N supply, where WOSR used autumn N to a lesser extent than spring N. An above-ground N uptake of at least 10–15 kg·N·ha−1 at the end of autumn growth was required to achieve high seed yields. From an environmental point of view, optimal autumn growth should be attained by choosing an adequate sowing method, not by applying additional N in autumn. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop