Search Results (4)

Purpose: Accurate and precise navigation in space and postural stability rely on the central integration of multisensory input (vestibular, proprioceptive, visual), weighted according to its reliability, to continuously update the internal estimate of the direction of gravity. In this study, we examined both peripheral and central vestibular functions in a world-renowned 53-year-old male tightrope walker and investigated the extent to which his exceptional performance was reflected in our findings. Methods: Comprehensive assessments were conducted, including semicircular canal function tests (caloric irrigation, rotatory-chair testing, video head impulse testing of all six canals, dynamic visual acuity) and otolith function evaluations (subjective visual vertical, fundus photography, ocular/cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials [oVEMPs/cVEMPs]). Additionally, static and dynamic posturography, as well as video-oculography (smooth-pursuit eye movements, saccades, nystagmus testing), were performed. The participant’s results were compared to established normative values. High-resolution diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT-MRI) was utilized to assess motor tract integrity. Results: Semicircular canal testing revealed normal results except for a slightly reduced response to right-sided caloric irrigation (26% asymmetry ratio; cut-off = 25%). Otolith testing, however, showed marked asymmetry in oVEMP amplitudes, confirmed with two devices (37% and 53% weaker on the left side; cut-off = 30%). Bone-conducted cVEMP amplitudes were mildly reduced bilaterally. Posturography, video-oculography, and subjective visual vertical testing were all within normal ranges. Diffusion tensor MRI revealed no structural abnormalities correlating with the observed functional asymmetry. Conclusions: This professional tightrope walker’s exceptional balance skills contrast starkly with significant peripheral vestibular (otolithic) deficits, while MR imaging, including diffusion tensor imaging, remained normal. These findings highlight the critical role of central computational mechanisms in optimizing multisensory input signals and fully compensating for vestibular asymmetries in this unique case. Full article

Maintaining balance comes naturally to healthy people. In subjects with vestibulopathy, even when compensated, and especially if it is bilateral, maintaining balance requires cognitive effort. Pupillometry is an established method of quantifying cognitive effort. Background/Objectives: We hypothesized that pupillometry would be able to capture the increased effort required to maintain posture in subjects with bilateral vestibulopathy in increasingly difficult conditions. Additionally, we hypothesized that the cognitive workload during balance tasks, indexed by pupil size, would decrease with the activation of the BionicVEST cochleo-vestibular implants. Methods: Subjects with a cochleo-vestibular implant as of March 2023 were recruited, excluding those with ophthalmological issues that precluded pupillometry. Pupillometry was performed using a validated modified videonystagmography system. Computed dynamic posturography and a Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration on Balance were performed while the pupil was recorded. Tests were first performed after 24 h of deactivating the vestibular component of the implant. Thereafter, it was reactivated, and after 1 h of rest, the tests were repeated. The pupil recording was processed using custom software and the mean relative pupil diameter (MRPD) was calculated. Results: There was an average of 10.7% to 24.2% reduction in MRPD when the vestibular implant was active, with a greater effect seen in tasks of moderate difficulty, and lesser effect when the task was easy or of great difficulty. Conclusions: Despite technical challenges, pupillometry appears to be a promising method of quantifying the cognitive effort required for maintaining posture in subjects with bilateral vestibulopathy before and after vestibular implantation. Full article

Background: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the influence of virtual reality (VR) exposure on postural stability and determine the mechanism of this influence. Methods: Twenty-six male participants aged 21–23 years were included, who underwent postural stability assessment twice before and after a few minute of single VR exposure. The VR projection was a computer-generated simulation of the surrounding scenery. Postural stability was assessed using the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), using Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP). Results: The findings indicated that VR exposure affects the visual and vestibular systems. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in results before and after VR exposure were observed in tests on an unstable surface. It was confirmed that VR exposure has a positive influence on postural stability, attributed to an increase in the sensory weight of the vestibular system. Partial evidence suggested that the reduction in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) reinforcement may result in an adaptive shift to the optokinetic reflex (OKR). Conclusions: By modifying the process of environmental perception through artificial sensory simulation, the influence of VR on postural stability has been demonstrated. The validity of this type of research is determined by the effectiveness of VR techniques in the field of vestibular rehabilitation. Full article

Although vision loss is known to affect equilibrium maintenance, postural control in patients affected by low vision has been poorly investigated. We evaluated postural stability and the ability to use visual, proprioceptive and vestibular information in different low vision patterns. Ten adults with normal vision (NC), fourteen adults affected by central visual impairment (CLV) and eight adults affected by peripheral visual impairment (PLV) were enrolled in our study. Patients underwent visual, vestibular and postural evaluation (bedside examination, Computed Dynamic Posturograophy). Motor Control Tests were performed to analyze automatic postural adaptive responses elicited by unexpected postural disturbances. Clinical evaluations did not show abnormality in all patients. In the Sensory Organization Test, CLV and PLV patients performed more poorly in conditions 3–6 and 3–4, as compared to NC subjects. The condition 5 score was significantly lower in the CLV group with respect to the PLV patients. Composite equilibrium scores demonstrated significant differences between low-vision subjects vs. NC subjects. No differences were found for somatosensorial contribution. Visual afferences showed lower values in all visually impaired subjects, while vestibular contribution was lower in the CLV patients as compared to the NC and PLV patients. MCT latencies were significantly worse in the CLV subjects. In the low-vision patients, postural control was modified with a specific pattern of strategy adaptation. Different modulations of postural control and different adaptive responses seemed to characterize CLV patients as compared to PLV subjects. Full article