Search Results (2)

The electrical ventricular storm (VES) is defined as multiple sustained ventricular arrhythmias arising in a short time, often refractory to standard antiarrhythmic treatment. The three pillars of the physiopathogenesis of the VES are autonomic dysfunction, triggers, and an altered ventricular substrate. Incessant or highly recurrent ventricular arrhythmia impacts the hemodynamic status by worsening heart failure and increasing mortality. A stepwise, team-based, and tailored therapeutic approach is required to stop ventricular arrhythmia and regain the hemodynamic and electric stability of the patient. The authors focused on describing all currently available therapeutic approaches for VES, intending to establish the best VES therapeutic approaches. This process involves considering the patient’s specific condition, responses to previous treatments, and the potential risks and benefits of each approach. The options range from adjusting antiarrhythmic therapy to reprogramming of the ICD, sedation, epidural anaesthesia, stellate ganglia anaesthetic block, and the use of ECMO or left ventricular assist devices and radiofrequency catheter ablation. Particular attention is paid to the detailed management of genetic primary arrhythmia syndromes like long-QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, Brugada syndrome and Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome, early repolarisation syndrome, right ventricular arrhythmogenic dysplasia, and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. After overcoming the acute events of VES and obtaining hemodynamic stability, the treatment should shift toward an optimal balance of heart failure therapy, controlling the substrate by revascularisation procedures and resolving other pathology-generating ventricular arrhythmias. This article provides a comprehensive overview of ESV’s current management options using the most efficient strategies known to date. Full article

Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) mortality remains high despite revascularization and the use of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Advanced mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, such as catheter-based ventricular assist devices (cVAD), may impact mortality. We aim to identify predictors of mortality in AMI-CS implanted with IABP and the proportion eligible for advanced MCS in an Asian population. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) stage C and above AMI-CS patients with IABP implanted from 2017–2019. We excluded patients who had IABP implanted for indications other than AMI-CS. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for patient characteristics. Results: Over the 3-year period, 242 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 12.4 years, 88% males) with AMI-CS had IABP implanted. 30-day mortality was 55%. On univariate analysis, cardiac arrest (p < 0.001), inotrope/vasopressor use prior to IABP (p = 0.004) was more common in non-survivors. Non-survivors were less likely to be smokers (p = 0.001), had lower ejection fraction, higher creatinine/ lactate and lower pH (all p < 0.001). On multi-variate analysis, predictors of mortality were cardiac arrest prior to IABP (aOR 4.00, CI 2.28–7.03), inotrope/vasopressor prior to IABP (aOR 2.41, CI 1.18–4.96), lower arterial pH (aOR 0.02, CI 0.00–0.31), higher lactate (aOR 2.42, CI 1.00–1.19), and lower hemoglobin (aOR 0.83, CI 0.71–0.98). Using institutional MCS criteria, 106 patients (44%) would have qualified for advanced MCS. Conclusions: Early mortality in AMI-CS remains high despite IABP. Many patients would have qualified for higher degrees of MCS. Full article