Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = burn aftercare

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1624 KiB  
Article
Measurement Equivalence and Feasibility of the Electronic and Paper Versions of the POSAS, EQ-5D, and DLQI: A Randomized Crossover Trial
by Jill Meirte, Nick Hellemans, Ulrike Van Daele, Koen Maertens, Lenie Denteneer, Mieke Anthonissen and Peter Moortgat
Eur. Burn J. 2024, 5(4), 321-334; https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj5040030 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1165
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial within person-centered care. The use of electronic PROMs (ePROMs) is increasing and multiple advantages have been described. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is a validated paper questionnaire to assess patient-reported scar quality in the [...] Read more.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial within person-centered care. The use of electronic PROMs (ePROMs) is increasing and multiple advantages have been described. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is a validated paper questionnaire to assess patient-reported scar quality in the burn and scar population. In burn and scar rehabilitation, quality of life questionnaires such as the Euroqol 5 Dimensions 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) allow us to measure physical and psychosocial impact. The goal of this research was to compare the equivalence of the electronic versions of the POSAS, the EQ-5D-5L, and the DLQI with their original paper counterparts. To ensure the psychometric properties of the electronic versions, we assessed the equivalence of scores, the differences in completion time, and patients’ preferred mode and ease of use. We used a randomized crossover design using a within-subject comparison of the formats of the questionnaires. Participants aged over 18 with a scar were recruited from an outpatient after-care and research center for burns and scars in Antwerp, Belgium. The equivalence of the electronic questionnaires POSAS, EQ-5D-5L, and DLQI is assumed based on the findings of this study. Completion times were faster for all the electronic versions but only statistically different (p = 0.002) for the electronic version of the EQ-5D-5L. The number of missing answers could be reduced to 0. The electronic assessment was preferred in >75% of the cases and subjects found it easy to use, and a tool that could improve the quality of care. Our findings support the electronic delivery of POSAS, EQ-5D, and DLQI, within the burn and scar population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Person-Centered and Family-Centered Care Following Burn Injuries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2313 KiB  
Article
Development and Testing of the Aftercare Problem List, a Burn Aftercare Screening Instrument
by Nancy E. E. Van Loey, Elise Boersma-van Dam, Anita Boekelaar, Anneke van de Steenoven, Alette E. E. de Jong and Helma W. C. Hofland
Eur. Burn J. 2024, 5(2), 90-103; https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj5020008 - 29 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1397
Abstract
A growing interest in person-centered care from a biopsychosocial perspective has led to increased attention to structural screening. The aim of this study was to develop an easy-to-comprehend screening instrument using single items to identify a broad range of health-related problems in adult [...] Read more.
A growing interest in person-centered care from a biopsychosocial perspective has led to increased attention to structural screening. The aim of this study was to develop an easy-to-comprehend screening instrument using single items to identify a broad range of health-related problems in adult burn survivors. This study builds on earlier work regarding content generation. Focus groups and expert meetings with healthcare providers informed content refinement, resulting in the Aftercare Problem List (APL). The instrument consists of 43 items divided into nine health domains: scars, daily life functioning, scars treatment, body perceptions, stigmatization, intimacy, mental health, relationships, financial concerns, and a positive coping domain. The APL also includes a Distress Thermometer and a question inquiring about preference to discuss the results with a healthcare provider. Subsequently, the APL was completed by 102 outpatients. To test face validity, a linear regression analysis showed that problems in three health domains, i.e., scars, mental health, and body perceptions, were significantly related to higher distress. Qualitative results revealed that a minority found the items difficult which led to further adjustment of the wording and the addition of illustrations. In summation, this study subscribes to the validity of using single items to screen for burn-related problems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Person-Centered and Family-Centered Care Following Burn Injuries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 243 KiB  
Article
A Qualitative Analysis of Burn Injury Patient and Caregiver Experiences in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: Enduring the Transition to a Post-Burn Life
by Camerin A. Rencken, Abigail D. Harrison, Adam R. Aluisio and Nikki Allorto
Eur. Burn J. 2021, 2(3), 75-87; https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj2030007 - 1 Jul 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4652
Abstract
Over 95% of fire-related burns occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), an important and frequently overlooked global health disparity, yet research is limited from LMICs on how survivors and their caregivers recover and successfully return to their pre-burn lives. This study examines [...] Read more.
Over 95% of fire-related burns occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), an important and frequently overlooked global health disparity, yet research is limited from LMICs on how survivors and their caregivers recover and successfully return to their pre-burn lives. This study examines the lived experiences of burn patients and caregivers, the most challenging aspects of their recoveries, and factors that have assisted in recovery. This qualitative study was conducted in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa at a 900-bed district hospital. Participants (n = 35) included burn patients (n = 13) and caregivers (n = 22) after discharge. In-depth interviews addressed the recovery process after a burn injury. Data were coded using NVivo 12. Analysis revealed three major thematic categories. Coded data were triangulated to analyze caregiver and patient perspectives jointly. The participants’ lived experiences fell into three main categories: (1) psychological impacts of the burn, (2) enduring the transition into daily life, and (3) reflections on difficulties survivors face in returning for aftercare. The most notable discussions regarded stigma, difficulty accepting self-image, loss of relationships, returning to work, and barriers in receiving long-term aftercare at the hospital outpatient clinic. Patients and caregivers face significant adversities integrating into society. This study highlights areas in which burn survivors may benefit from assistance to inform future interventions and international health policy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Global Burden of Burns, Burn Care Management and Outcome)
13 pages, 316 KiB  
Article
“They Are Worth Their Weight in Gold”: Families and Clinicians’ Perspectives on the Role of First Nations Health Workers in Paediatric Burn Care in Australia
by Julieann Coombes, Sarah Fraser, Kate Hunter, Rebecca Ivers, Andrew Holland, Julian Grant and Tamara Mackean
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(5), 2297; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052297 - 26 Feb 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4970
Abstract
Burns affect Australia’s First Nations children more than other Australian children, they also experience longer lengths of stay in tertiary burns units and face barriers in accessing burn aftercare treatment. Data sets from two studies were combined whereby 19 families, 11 First Nations [...] Read more.
Burns affect Australia’s First Nations children more than other Australian children, they also experience longer lengths of stay in tertiary burns units and face barriers in accessing burn aftercare treatment. Data sets from two studies were combined whereby 19 families, 11 First Nations Health Worker (FNHW) and 56 multidisciplinary burn team members from across Australia described the actual or perceived role of FNHW in multidisciplinary burn care. Data highlighted similarities between the actual role of FNHW as described by families and as described by FNHW such as enabling cultural safety and advocacy. In contrast, a disconnect between the actual experience of First Nations families and health workers and that as perceived by multidisciplinary burn team members was evident. More work is needed to understand the impact of this disconnect and how to address it. Full article
Back to TopTop