Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = bleximenib

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 1348 KB  
Review
Menin Inhibition in Acute Myeloid MLL Rearranged Leukemias: A New Target for Precision Care
by Caterina Alati, Matteo Molica, Martina Pitea, Violetta Marafioti, Gaetana Porto, Giorgia Policastro, Erica Bilardi, Giovanna Utano, Laura Giordano, Annalisa Sgarlata, Ilaria Maria Delfino, Aurora Idato, Giulia Santoro, Marco Rossi and Massimo Martino
Cancers 2026, 18(4), 637; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18040637 - 15 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1055
Abstract
Menin inhibitors are the first targeted therapies for KMT2A-rearranged and NPM1-mutated acute leukemias, addressing a significant unmet need in these high-risk subtypes. Revumenib received approval in 2024–2025 for relapsed or refractory KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia and NPM1-mutated AML. The AUG-MENT-101 trial reported a 23% [...] Read more.
Menin inhibitors are the first targeted therapies for KMT2A-rearranged and NPM1-mutated acute leukemias, addressing a significant unmet need in these high-risk subtypes. Revumenib received approval in 2024–2025 for relapsed or refractory KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia and NPM1-mutated AML. The AUG-MENT-101 trial reported a 23% composite complete remission rate in heavily pretreated patients, with 61% of responders achieving MRD negativity. Several menin inhibitors, including ziftomenib, bleximenib, and enzomenib, are in clinical development. They demonstrate similar efficacy, but their safety profiles differ, especially regarding QTc prolongation and coverage of resistance mutations. Combination therapies with azacitidine and venetoclax or intensive chemotherapy have achieved high response rates in newly diagnosed patients, supporting their potential use in frontline treatment. Acquired resistance, often due to MEN1 mutations at the drug-binding interface, occurs in about 40% of cases. Distinct resistance patterns among menin inhibitors suggest the possibility of sequential therapy. Approximately 30–40% of responders in relapsed or refractory trials proceeded to allogeneic transplantation, which remains a key pathway to potential cure. This review examines the molecular mechanisms of the menin-KMT2A interaction, and summarizes clinical trial data on the efficacy and safety of menin inhibitors as monotherapy and in combination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 262 KB  
Review
Differentiation Syndrome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Spectrum, and Emerging Therapeutic Paradigms
by Razan Mansour, Abeer Yaseen and Zaid Abdel Rahman
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(4), 1775; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27041775 - 12 Feb 2026
Viewed by 949
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by differentiation arrest, driving blast proliferation, and abnormal blood formation. While differentiation therapy revolutionized acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO), its extension into non-APL AML has been limited until recent [...] Read more.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by differentiation arrest, driving blast proliferation, and abnormal blood formation. While differentiation therapy revolutionized acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO), its extension into non-APL AML has been limited until recent targeted agents. This narrative review synthesizes preclinical and clinical evidence into differentiation-inducing therapy, with a focus on IDH1/2, FLT3 and menin inhibitors. Following SANRA guidelines, we searched PubMed (2010–September 2025) for clinical trials and key preclinical studies, with particular attention to the molecular mechanism of differentiation induction, clinical efficacy, and the management of differentiation syndrome (DS). IDH1/2 inhibitors (ivosidenib, enasidenib, olutasidenib) yield overall response rates (ORRs) of 30–94% in AML with DS in 10–19%. Menin inhibitors (revumenib, ziftomenib, enzomenib, bleximenib) achieve ORRs of 33–88% in KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1-mutated AML, with DS in 10–25% and QT prolongation as key toxicities. FLT3 inhibitors (gilteritinib, quizartinib) improve survival in FLT3-mutated AML with DS in 1–5%. Resistance mutations limit durability and combinations enhance efficacy. Differentiation therapy represents a paradigm shift towards non-cytotoxic AML management. Improved recognition of DS and rational combination approaches will be essential to maximize the therapeutic benefit. Future research should address mechanisms of resistance and biomarkers to achieve cures beyond APL. Full article
15 pages, 427 KB  
Review
Therapeutic Implications of Menin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Acute Leukemia: A Critical Review
by Martina Canichella, Cristina Papayannidis, Carla Mazzone and Paolo de Fabritiis
Diseases 2025, 13(7), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13070227 - 19 Jul 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4513
Abstract
Menin inhibitors are a class of targeted agents that exemplify how a deeper understanding of leukemia pathogenesis can unify seemingly distinct genetic acute leukemia subgroups under a common therapeutic strategy. In particular, acute leukemia with NPM1 mutations (NPM1m) and KMT2A rearrangements ( [...] Read more.
Menin inhibitors are a class of targeted agents that exemplify how a deeper understanding of leukemia pathogenesis can unify seemingly distinct genetic acute leukemia subgroups under a common therapeutic strategy. In particular, acute leukemia with NPM1 mutations (NPM1m) and KMT2A rearrangements (KMT2Ar) represent the primary targets of this emerging drug class. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with NPM1m—which accounts for approximately 30% of AML cases and AML or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with KMT2Ar—and is present in 5–10% of cases, shares a common pathogenetic mechanism: the aberrant activation of the MEIS1–HOXA axis. These leukemic subsets are associated with poor prognosis, particularly in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. For KMT2Ar AML, the prognosis is especially dismal, with a median overall survival (OS) of 2.4 months and a complete remission (CR) rate of only 5%. In NPM1m AML, intensive chemotherapy achieves remission in approximately 80% of cases, but relapse remains a major challenge, occurring in nearly 50% of patients. Relapsed NPM1m AML is linked to a poor prognosis, with a median OS of 6.1 months (12-month OS: 30%) and a median relapse-free survival (RFS) of 5.5 months (12-month RFS: 34%). Menin inhibitors directly target the leukemogenic transcriptional program driven by HOX and MEIS1, disrupting oncogenic signaling and offering a promising therapeutic approach for these high-risk patients. This class of agents has rapidly progressed through clinical development, showing promising antileukemic activity in both treatment-naïve and R/R AML. Currently, six menin inhibitors are in clinical evaluation as monotherapy or in combination regimens: revumenib, ziftomenib, bleximenib (previously JNJ-75276617), enzomenib (previously DSP-5336), DS-1594, and BMF-219. In this review, we critically analyze the clinical development and therapeutic potential of the four most extensively studied menin inhibitors—revumenib, ziftomenib, bleximenib, and enzomenib. We discuss their efficacy, safety profiles, and potential roles within the current treatment algorithm. The continued clinical evaluation of menin inhibitors may redefine treatment paradigms for NPM1m and KMT2Ar AML and other acute leukemia with the aberrant MEIS1-HOXA axis, offering new hope for patients with limited therapeutic options. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Therapies for Acute Leukemias)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop