Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = basocellular carcinoma

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 3943 KiB  
Article
Preserving Esthetics: Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) as a Potential Alternative to Surgery for Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Midface
by Alessia Re, Sebastiana Lai, Glenda Mantione, Andrea D’Aviero, Fabrizio Sanna, Elisa Pilloni, Sebastiano Menna, Danila Piccari, Althea Boschetti, Bruno Fionda, Davide Porru, Pierangela Tramaloni, Roberto Gallus, Luca Tagliaferri, Maria Antonietta Montesu, Corrado Rubino, Francesco Bussu and Gian Carlo Mattiucci
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3305; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103305 - 9 May 2025
Viewed by 552
Abstract
Background/Objectives: High-dose-rate (HDR) interventional radiotherapy (IRT) represents a valuable treatment alternative for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the midface, especially in the presence of esthetic or functional issues related to surgery. This retrospective study examines the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: High-dose-rate (HDR) interventional radiotherapy (IRT) represents a valuable treatment alternative for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the midface, especially in the presence of esthetic or functional issues related to surgery. This retrospective study examines the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent HDR-IRT at our institution. Methods: Patients (pts) with histologically confirmed midface BCC were treated with HDR-IRT using superficial, interstitial, or endocavitary implants depending on tumor characteristics. Fractionation regimens were tailored to tumor location: 45 Gy in 9 fractions twice a day (the cheeks/lips) and 44 Gy in 14 fractions (the nose, with the first and last fractions delivering 4 Gy each, administered once daily, and the remaining 12 fractions delivering 3 Gy each, administered twice daily (BID) with an inter-fraction interval of at least 6 h). Treatment efficacy was assessed based on local control rates, toxicity (CTCAE criteria), and cosmetic outcomes. Results: Eight patients were considered. The most common tumor site was the nose (seven patients, 87.5%), followed by the upper lip. Tumors were either primary (three patients, 37.5%) or residual/recurrent after previous surgery with involved margins (five patients, 62.5%). The median follow-up was 6 months (range: 1–19 months). Clinical local control was achieved in all cases, with persistent alteration at dermoscopy in one patient six months after the completion of treatment. Acute toxicities were minimal, with two patients developing grade 3 skin toxicity, which resolved within 1–3 months with topical management. Cosmetic outcomes were favorable across all patients. Conclusions: HDR-IRT is a well-tolerated, effective, and cosmetically favorable treatment for midface BCC. Our institutional experience supports its use as an alternative to surgery in cosmetically sensitive areas and in selected patients/lesions unfit for surgery. Endocavitary implants appear to be an effective option to cover the full thickness nasal wall without resorting to interstitial implants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Treatment in Head–Neck Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 731 KiB  
Review
Targeted Drug Delivery in Periorbital Non-Melanocytic Skin Malignancies
by Benedetta Tirone, Anna Scarabosio, Pier Luigi Surico, Pier Camillo Parodi, Fabiana D’Esposito, Alessandro Avitabile, Caterina Foti, Caterina Gagliano and Marco Zeppieri
Bioengineering 2024, 11(10), 1029; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11101029 - 15 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1704
Abstract
Targeted drug delivery has emerged as a transformative approach in the treatment of periorbital skin malignancies, offering the potential for enhanced efficacy and reduced side effects compared to traditional therapies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of targeted therapies in the context of [...] Read more.
Targeted drug delivery has emerged as a transformative approach in the treatment of periorbital skin malignancies, offering the potential for enhanced efficacy and reduced side effects compared to traditional therapies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of targeted therapies in the context of periorbital malignancies, including basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. It explores the mechanisms of action for various targeted therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, small molecule inhibitors, and immunotherapies, and their applications in treating these malignancies. Additionally, this review addresses the management of ocular and periocular side effects associated with these therapies, emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to minimize impact and ensure patient adherence. By integrating current findings and discussing emerging trends, this review aims to highlight the advancements in targeted drug delivery and its potential to improve treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients with periorbital skin malignancies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances and Trends in Ophthalmic Diseases Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 425 KiB  
Review
Approach of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) Syndrome–Related Skin Tumors
by Livia-Cristiana Băicoianu-Nițescu, Ana-Maria Gheorghe, Mara Carsote, Mihai Cristian Dumitrascu and Florica Sandru
Diagnostics 2022, 12(11), 2768; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112768 - 12 Nov 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3145
Abstract
Non-endocrine findings in patients with MEN1 (multiple endocrine neoplasia) syndrome also include skin lesions, especially tumor-type lesions. This is a narrative review of the English-language medical literature including original studies concerning MEN1 and dermatological issues (apart from dermatologic features of each endocrine tumor/neuroendocrine [...] Read more.
Non-endocrine findings in patients with MEN1 (multiple endocrine neoplasia) syndrome also include skin lesions, especially tumor-type lesions. This is a narrative review of the English-language medical literature including original studies concerning MEN1 and dermatological issues (apart from dermatologic features of each endocrine tumor/neuroendocrine neoplasia), identified through a PubMed-based search (based on clinical relevance, with no timeline restriction or concern regarding the level of statistical significance). We identified 27 original studies involving clinical presentation of patients with MEN1 and cutaneous tumors; eight other original studies that also included the genetic background; and four additional original studies were included. The largest cohorts were from studies in Italy (N = 145 individuals), Spain (N = 90), the United States (N = 48 and N = 32), and Japan (N = 28). The age of patients varied from 18 to 76 years, with the majority of individuals in their forties. The most common cutaneous tumors are angiofibromas (AF), collagenomas (CG), and lipomas (L). Other lesions are atypical nevi, basocellular carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, acrochordons, papillomatosis confluens et reticularis, gingival papules, and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma of the eyelid. Non-tumor aspects are confetti-like hypopigmentation, café-au-lait macules, and gingival papules. MEN1 gene, respective menin involvement has also been found in melanomas, but the association with MEN1 remains debatable. Typically, cutaneous tumors (AF, CG, and L) are benign and are surgically treated only for cosmetic reasons. Some of them are reported as first presentation. Even though skin lesions are not pathognomonic, recognizing them plays an important role in early identification of MEN1 patients. Whether a subgroup of MEN1 subjects is prone to developing these types of cutaneous lesions and how they influence MEN1 evolution is still an open issue. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Entities, New Approaches of Endocrine Diseases)
Back to TopTop