Search Results (3)

In soft soil areas, to compare the load-bearing characteristics of bag grouting piles and cement mixing piles and study the load-bearing mechanism of bag grouting piles, field tests are conducted in this study, including the comparative compressive test of bag grouting piles and cement mixing piles, and the analysis of pile axial force, pile side friction resistance, and pile end resistance. Moreover, a numerical simulation is developed using ABAQUS 2020 (finite element analysis software) for three-dimensional modeling. The numerical simulation results are compared with the field test results to verify the reliability of the numerical simulation. Furthermore, the influences of five factors are studied; namely, pile length, pile diameter, pile spacing, the thickness of the bedding layer, and grouting pressure are studied for their effects on the compressive bearing characteristics of the bag grouting pile. The results show the following: (1) For composite foundations, bag grouting piles are more effective than cement mixing piles in soft soil areas, and the former provide an 8.8% increase in the bearing characteristics. (2) With an increase in the load, the bag grouting pile experiences greater compression in the middle of the pile body, and the pile side friction resistance is increased; therefore, the pile side friction resistance can be fully developed, and the bag grouting piles have the ability to transfer the load from the top of the pile to the soil at the bottom of the pile. (3) When the external load is maximized, the sharing ratio of pile side friction resistance reaches 96.3%, which shows the excellent frictional performance of bag grouting piles. (4) Among the five factors mentioned above, the most important one is the pile diameter, followed by the pile length and pile spacing, the thickness of the bedding layer, and finally the grouting pressure. The optimal combination in this paper is a pile length of 18 m, pile diameter of 0.4 m, pile spacing of 1.0 m, bedding thickness of 0.3 m, and grouting pressure of 0.6 MPa. Therefore, changing the pile diameter can be given priority during the construction design. The findings in this paper can provide valuable insights and practical experience for the design of similar engineering projects. Full article

The construction process of pile foundations can significantly disrupt the soil. Therefore, it is necessary to limit the degree of soil disturbance caused by pile foundation construction to an acceptable level. This paper examines the disturbance effects of pile driving on soft soil foundations, specifically analyzing the squeezing effect of squeezed soil piles and the unloading effect of non-squeezed soil piles. To investigate these effects, two typical squeezed soil piles, a hydrostatic pile, and a bag grouting pile, as well as a typical non-squeezed soil pile (a bored pile) are selected. Specifically, a novel construction method for numerical models, which simulates the mechanical processes of different pile types under standard grids, is proposed. Three crucial indicators—soil displacement field, stress field, and disturbance influence range—are chosen to compare the disturbance effects of three types of piles on the soil. Results indicate that the two types of squeezed soil piles cause significant disturbance to the soil displacement field, especially in the horizontal direction, while causing a relatively slight disturbance to the soil stress field. Among the two of them, the disturbance magnitude and range of the hydrostatic pile are greater than those of the bag grouting pile. For the non-squeezed soil pile, the soil displacement field changes minimally and the stress field remains basically unchanged during the pile driving process of the bored pile. To compare and quantify the disturbance effects of three types of piles on soil, the soil disturbance range in the horizontal direction of each pile is normalized by its radius. Results indicate that the horizontal disturbance values of maximum horizontal stress for all three types of piles are approximately 1/5 of the pile length above the pile tip, with normalized values of 7.6, 5.5, and 3.5, respectively. The maximum horizontal deformation disturbance range in the horizontal direction occurs near the ground surface and has normalized values of 15.2, 7.5, and 1.1 for the three types of piles, respectively. Therefore, the hydrostatic pile has the greatest disturbance effect, followed by the bag grouting pile and the bored pile. However, within the allowable range of disturbance in practical engineering, the optimal piling method can be selected by comprehensively considering factors such as the construction difficulty and economic costs. Full article

High-speed railways are built in deep soft-soil foundations interlayered with hard materials. However, the hard layers cannot be penetrated by conventional foundation treatment. Moreover, the project cost is sometimes prohibitive, which is an issue for post-construction subsidence control. The bag grouting pile is a special grouting-pile-reinforcement technique for treating soft-soil foundations interlayered with hard materials. This paper conducted tests on the Ningbo-Taizhou-Wenzhou ballast track passenger railway, combining a conventional mixing-pile-foundation (not through hard layer) processing station and the bag-grouting-pile-processing subgrade line. Using field tests combined with numerical calculation, the lateral displacement, settlement and pile–soil stress were tested to obtain the working properties of the grouting-pile-composite foundation. The variation in the law of lateral displacement, settlement, and pile–soil stress of the foundation was studied. The results showed that the post-construction subsidence of bag-grouting-pile- and conventional mixing-pile-foundation control was less than 15 cm and 30 cm, respectively, which met the design requirements. The results also showed that the design scheme was reasonable (load-sharing ratio of bag-pile-foundation pile soil-based test was reasonable). The numerical calculation showed a change in pile diameter. It also showed that pile spacing could not improve subsidence-control properties, bag grouting pile can promote pore-pressure dissipation and accelerate consolidation, and pile spacing can be increased to cut project costs incurred by the pile-bearing capacity. Full article