Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = anti-mGluR5 encephalitis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
8 pages, 1194 KiB  
Case Report
Persisting Verbal Memory Encoding and Recall Deficiency after mGluR5 Autoantibody-Mediated Encephalitis
by Niels Hansen, Kristin Rentzsch, Sina Hirschel, Jens Wiltfang, Björn H. Schott, Berend Malchow and Claudia Bartels
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(11), 1537; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13111537 - 31 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1859 | Correction
Abstract
Background: Metabotropic glutamate receptors type 5 (mGluR5) play a central role in persistent forms of synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Antibodies to mGluR5 have been reported to be clinically associated with memory impairment. Here, we report on a patient with persistent amnestic cognitive [...] Read more.
Background: Metabotropic glutamate receptors type 5 (mGluR5) play a central role in persistent forms of synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Antibodies to mGluR5 have been reported to be clinically associated with memory impairment. Here, we report on a patient with persistent amnestic cognitive impairment in a single cognitive domain after resolution of mGluR5-associated encephalitis. Methods: We report on the clinical data of a patient in our Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy who underwent several diagnostic investigations including a detailed neuropsychological examination, magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis involving the determination of neural autoantibodies. Results: A 54-year-old woman presented to our memory clinic with pleocytosis 4 months after remission of probable anti-mGluR5-mediated encephalitis, revealing initial pleocytosis and serum proof of anti-mGluR5 autoantibodies (1:32). A neuropsychological examination revealed mild cognitive impairment in verbal memory encoding and recall. The patient received immunotherapy with corticosteroids, and a subsequent cerebrospinal fluid analysis 1.5 months after the onset of encephalitis confirmed no further signs of inflammation. Conclusions: Our results suggest that although immunotherapy resulted in the remission of anti-mGluR5 encephalitis, a verbal memory encoding and recall dysfunction persisted. It remains unclear whether the reason for the persistent verbal memory impairment is attributable to insufficiently long immunotherapy or initially ineffective immunotherapy. Because mGluR5 plays an essential role in persistent synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus, it is tempting to speculate that the mGluR5 antibody–antigen complex could lead to persistent cognitive dysfunction, still present after the acute CNS inflammation stage of encephalitis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Behavioral Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4486 KiB  
Article
Hodgkin Lymphoma Cell Lines and Tissues Express mGluR5: A Potential Link to Ophelia Syndrome and Paraneoplastic Neurological Disease
by Sofia Schnell, Ellen Knierim, Petra Bittigau, Jakob Kreye, Kathrin Hauptmann, Patrick Hundsdoerfer, Susanne Morales-Gonzalez, Markus Schuelke and Marc Nikolaus
Cells 2023, 12(4), 606; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040606 - 13 Feb 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3234
Abstract
Ophelia syndrome is characterized by the coincidence of severe neuropsychiatric symptoms, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and the presence of antibodies to the metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor (mGluR5). Little is known about the pathogenetic link between these symptoms and the role that anti-mGluR5-antibodies play. We [...] Read more.
Ophelia syndrome is characterized by the coincidence of severe neuropsychiatric symptoms, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and the presence of antibodies to the metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor (mGluR5). Little is known about the pathogenetic link between these symptoms and the role that anti-mGluR5-antibodies play. We investigated lymphoma tissue from patients with Ophelia syndrome and with isolated classical Hodgkin lymphoma by quantitative immunocytochemistry for mGluR5-expression. Further, we studied the L-1236, L-428, L-540, SUP-HD1, KM-H2, and HDLM-2 classical Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines by FACS and Western blot for mGluR5-expression, and by transcriptome analysis. mGluR5 surface expression differed significantly in terms of receptor density, distribution pattern, and percentage of positive cells. The highest expression levels were found in the L-1236 line. RNA-sequencing revealed more than 800 genes that were higher expressed in the L-1236 line in comparison to the other classical Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines. High mGluR5-expression was associated with upregulation of PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways and of downstream targets (e.g., EGR1) known to be involved in classical Hodgkin lymphoma progression. Finally, mGluR5 expression was increased in the classical Hodgkin lymphoma-tissue of our Ophelia syndrome patient in contrast to five classical Hodgkin lymphoma-patients without autoimmune encephalitis. Given the association of encephalitis and classical Hodgkin lymphoma in Ophelia syndrome, it is possible that mGluR5-expression in classical Hodgkin lymphoma cells not only drives tumor progression but also triggers anti-mGluR5 encephalitis even before classical Hodgkin lymphoma becomes manifest. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors in Health and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1041 KiB  
Review
Fundamental Mechanisms of Autoantibody-Induced Impairments on Ion Channels and Synapses in Immune-Mediated Cerebellar Ataxias
by Hiroshi Mitoma, Jerome Honnorat, Kazuhiko Yamaguchi and Mario Manto
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 4936; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144936 - 13 Jul 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 5784
Abstract
In the last years, different kinds of limbic encephalitis associated with autoantibodies against ion channels and synaptic receptors have been described. Many studies have demonstrated that such autoantibodies induce channel or receptor dysfunction. The same mechanism is discussed in immune-mediated cerebellar ataxias (IMCAs), [...] Read more.
In the last years, different kinds of limbic encephalitis associated with autoantibodies against ion channels and synaptic receptors have been described. Many studies have demonstrated that such autoantibodies induce channel or receptor dysfunction. The same mechanism is discussed in immune-mediated cerebellar ataxias (IMCAs), but the pathogenesis has been less investigated. The aim of the present review is to evaluate what kind of cerebellar ion channels, their related proteins, and the synaptic machinery proteins that are preferably impaired by autoantibodies so as to develop cerebellar ataxias (CAs). The cerebellum predictively coordinates motor and cognitive functions through a continuous update of an internal model. These controls are relayed by cerebellum-specific functions such as precise neuronal discharges with potassium channels, synaptic plasticity through calcium signaling pathways coupled with voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) and metabotropic glutamate receptors 1 (mGluR1), a synaptic organization with glutamate receptor delta (GluRδ), and output signal formation through chained GABAergic neurons. Consistently, the association of CAs with anti-potassium channel-related proteins, anti-VGCC, anti-mGluR1, and GluRδ, and anti-glutamate decarboxylase 65 antibodies is observed in IMCAs. Despite ample distributions of AMPA and GABA receptors, however, CAs are rare in conditions with autoantibodies against these receptors. Notably, when the autoantibodies impair synaptic transmission, the autoimmune targets are commonly classified into three categories: release machinery proteins, synaptic adhesion molecules, and receptors. This physiopathological categorization impacts on both our understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical prognosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop