Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = XAR 450

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 5050 KB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Microstructure and Properties of Wear-Resistant Structural Steels
by Helena Lukšić, Tomislav Rodinger, Vera Rede, Zrinka Švagelj and Danko Ćorić
Materials 2025, 18(17), 4002; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18174002 - 27 Aug 2025
Viewed by 248
Abstract
This paper presents the results of wear tests of two types of commercial low-carbon, low-alloy martensitic abrasion-resistant steels, Hardox 450 and XAR 450, which belong to the hardness class 450 HBW. These steels, due to their increased resistance to the abrasive wear mechanism, [...] Read more.
This paper presents the results of wear tests of two types of commercial low-carbon, low-alloy martensitic abrasion-resistant steels, Hardox 450 and XAR 450, which belong to the hardness class 450 HBW. These steels, due to their increased resistance to the abrasive wear mechanism, are used for machine parts for applications in intensive abrasion environments such as construction, mining, and agriculture. The scope of work included microstructure analysis on an optical microscope, chemical composition analysis, Vickers hardness measurements at different loads (HV0.2, HV1 and HV2), and wear testing. Wear tests were carried out by the standard method “dry sand—rubber wheel”, and tests on the Taber abrader device. Microstructure analysis revealed that both steels have a similar non-oriented, homogenous, fine-grained martensitic microstructure. The results of HV2 hardness measurements showed a similar trend for both steels in all examined sections of the plates. For both tested steels, the hardness values of HV0.2 and HV1 are slightly higher than HV2, but the scattering of the results is also greater. Abrasion resistance testing using the standard “dry sand—rubber wheel” method showed that Hardox 450 steel has a lower volume loss of about 8%, but a greater scattering of the results compared to XAR 450 steel. The results of the abrasion resistance test on the Taber abrader device confirmed approximately the same behavior. For both steels, a prediction model was established for a reliable assessment of the wear intensity concerning the grain size. Although examined steels belong to the same hardness class, Hardox steel seems to be a more appropriate choice for the manufacture of machine components exposed to abrasive wear. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop