Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Revaclear

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1210 KB  
Article
Expanded Hemodialysis with Theranova 500 Improves Dialysis Adequacy and Blunts Inflammation: A 24-Week Quasi-Randomized Trial
by Nomy Levin Iaina, Elena Rotshild, Sharon Mini Goldberg and Pazit Beckerman
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(24), 8853; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248853 - 14 Dec 2025
Viewed by 611
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Uremic middle molecules contribute to chronic inflammation and symptom burden in hemodialysis patients. The Theranova 500 medium-cutoff (MCO) dialyzer enhances clearance of larger uremic toxins and may offer clinical advantages. We hypothesized that Theranova 500 would improve dialysis adequacy (spKt/V), attenuate [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Uremic middle molecules contribute to chronic inflammation and symptom burden in hemodialysis patients. The Theranova 500 medium-cutoff (MCO) dialyzer enhances clearance of larger uremic toxins and may offer clinical advantages. We hypothesized that Theranova 500 would improve dialysis adequacy (spKt/V), attenuate inflammation (CRP), and provide targeted improvement in symptom burden compared with the high-flux Revaclear 500. Methods: We conducted an open-label, prospective, quasi-randomized controlled trial including forty prevalent adult hemodialysis patients from two centers in Israel (Barzilai and Sheba Medical Centers). Patients were sequentially allocated 1:1 to Theranova 500 or Revaclear 500. Demographic, laboratory, and patient-reported outcomes (KDQOL-SF, Dialysis Symptom Index) were assessed at baseline and week 24. Within-group changes were analyzed using paired tests, and between-group differences using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values. Safety monitoring included adverse events, dialyzer reactions, hospitalizations, and mortality. Results: Theranova 500 significantly increased mean spKt/V (1.24 ± 0.33 to 1.40 ± 0.36; p = 0.025), while Revaclear showed no significant change. CRP remained stable in the Theranova group but rose nearly threefold in the Revaclear group by week 24 (p < 0.001). Albumin, dry weight, anemia and mineral bone parameters remained stable in both groups. Total cholesterol increased modestly in the Theranova arm without nutritional compromise. Symptom-level analysis showed improvement in irritability, restless leg, dry skin, chest pain, and diarrhea with Theranova, whereas global KDQOL-SF domain scores improved similarly in both groups. No non-serious adverse events, hypersensitivity reactions, or dialyzer-related intolerance was observed. Hospitalizations (n = 8 per group) and mortality (two per group) were identical. Conclusions: Over 24 weeks, Theranova 500 MCO dialyzer improved dialysis adequacy and prevented the rise in inflammatory markers seen with Revaclear without compromising nutrition or safety. Targeted improvement in specific uremic symptoms suggests potential clinical benefit beyond small-molecule clearance. These findings support the safety and clinical utility of expanded hemodialysis and highlight the need for larger, fully randomized trials to validate these results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis: Early and Late Outcomes)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1506 KB  
Article
A Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Clearance of Vancomycin during Haemodialysis Using Medium Cut-Off Membrane (Theranova) and High-Flux Membranes (Revaclear)
by Hussain Allawati, Linda Dallas, Sreejith Nair, Janine Palmer, Shaiju Thaikandy and Colin Hutchison
Toxins 2020, 12(5), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12050317 - 12 May 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5955
Abstract
Medium cut-off membrane (MCO) dialysers have been shown to remove a range of middle molecules, which are associated with adverse outcomes in haemodialysis (HD) patients, more effectively than high-flux HD. Vancomycin is widely used in HD patients for treating a variety of infections. [...] Read more.
Medium cut-off membrane (MCO) dialysers have been shown to remove a range of middle molecules, which are associated with adverse outcomes in haemodialysis (HD) patients, more effectively than high-flux HD. Vancomycin is widely used in HD patients for treating a variety of infections. To avoid subtherapeutic trough concentrations, it is important to understand vancomycin clearance in patients undergoing HD with the MCO membrane. This open label single centre, cross-over clinical study compared the vancomycin pharmacokinetics in chronic HD patients using MCO membrane (Theranova) and high-flux membrane (Revaclear). Five patients established on chronic HD who were due to receive vancomycin were enrolled. The study used alternating Theranova and Revaclear dialysis membranes over six consecutive sessions. Vancomycin was administered over the last one to two hours of each HD session. The maintenance dose was adjusted based on pre-HD serum concentrations. Over the 210 study samples, vancomycin clearance was higher with MCO-HD compared to high-flux HD but not statistically significant. Median percentage of vancomycin removal at 120 min by MCO membrane was 39% (20.6–51.5%) compared with 34.1% (21.3–48.4%) with high-flux HD. MCO-HD removes a slightly higher percentage of vancomycin at 120 min into dialysis compared to high-flux membrane dialysis in HD patients with infections. Application of vancomycin during the last one to two hours of each dialysis is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations to minimise loss through the dialyser and maintain therapeutic levels. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Dysfunction in Uremia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop