Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Poacevirus

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 2102 KB  
Article
High-Throughput Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Unveils Complex Viral Population in Kansas Wheat: Implications for Sustainable Virus Management
by Nar B. Ranabhat, John P. Fellers, Myron A. Bruce and Jessica L. Shoup Rupp
Viruses 2025, 17(1), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17010126 - 17 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1973
Abstract
Wheat viruses are major yield-reducing factors, with mixed infections causing substantial economic losses. Determining field virus populations is crucial for effective management and developing virus-resistant cultivars. This study utilized the high-throughput Oxford Nanopore sequencing technique (ONT) to characterize wheat viral populations in major [...] Read more.
Wheat viruses are major yield-reducing factors, with mixed infections causing substantial economic losses. Determining field virus populations is crucial for effective management and developing virus-resistant cultivars. This study utilized the high-throughput Oxford Nanopore sequencing technique (ONT) to characterize wheat viral populations in major wheat-growing counties of Kansas from 2019 to 2021. Wheat leaves exhibiting virus-like symptoms were collected, total RNA was extracted, and cDNA libraries were prepared using a PCR-cDNA barcoding kit, then loaded onto ONT MinION flow cells. Sequencing reads aligned with cereal virus references identified eight wheat virus species. Tritimovirus tritici (wheat streak mosaic virus, WSMV), Poacevirus tritici (Triticum mosaic virus, TriMV), Bromovirus BMV (brome mosaic virus, BMV), as well as Emaravirus tritici, Luteovirus pavhordei, L. sgvhordei, Bymovirus tritici, and Furovirus tritici. Mixed infections involving two to five viruses in a single sample were common, with the most prevalent being WSMV + TriMV at 16.7% and WSMV + TriMV + BMV at 11.9%. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a wide distribution of WSMV isolates, including European and recombinant variants. A phylogenetic analysis of Emaravirus tritici based on RNA 3A and 3B segments and whole-genome characterization of Furovirus tritici were also conducted. These findings advance understanding of genetic variability, phylogenetics, and viral co-infections, supporting the development of sustainable management practices through host genetic resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Viruses of Plants, Fungi and Protozoa)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 4283 KB  
Article
Seed Transmission of Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus and Triticum Mosaic Virus in Differentially Resistant Wheat Cultivars
by Saurabh Gautam, Senthilraja Chinnaiah, Benjamin Herron, Fekede Workneh, Charles M. Rush and Kiran R. Gadhave
Viruses 2023, 15(8), 1774; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15081774 - 21 Aug 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2742
Abstract
Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) and Triticum mosaic virus (TriMV) are important viral pathogens of wheat in the Great Plains. These viruses individually or in mixed infections with High Plains wheat mosaic virus cause a devastating wheat streak mosaic (WSM) disease. Although seed [...] Read more.
Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) and Triticum mosaic virus (TriMV) are important viral pathogens of wheat in the Great Plains. These viruses individually or in mixed infections with High Plains wheat mosaic virus cause a devastating wheat streak mosaic (WSM) disease. Although seed transmission of WSMV has been studied, no information is currently available on that of TriMV. Furthermore, no study has explored the implications of mixed infections of WSMV and TriMV on seed transmission of one or both viruses. To study both aspects, seeds from differentially resistant field-grown wheat plants (cv. TAM 304 (susceptible), Joe (WSMV resistant, Wsm2 gene), and Breakthrough (BT) (WSMV and TriMV resistant, Wsm1 gene)) showing characteristic WSM symptoms were collected and analyzed to quantify both viruses using qRT-PCR. The percentage of seeds tested positive for WSMV or TriMV individually and in mixed infection varied with cultivar and virus combinations; 13% of TAM 304 seeds tested positive for WSMV, followed by 8% of BT and 4% of Joe seeds. Similarly, TriMV was detected in 12% of BT seeds, followed by 11% of TAM 304 and 8% of Joe seeds. Lastly, mixed infection was detected in 7% of TAM 304 seeds, followed by 4% in BT, and 2% in Joe. Dissection of field-collected seeds into three parts, embryo, endosperm, and seed coat, revealed both WSMV and TriMV accumulated only in the seed coat. Consistent with seeds, percent infection of WSMV or TriMV in the plants that emerged from infected seeds in each treatment varied with cultivar and virus combinations (WSMV: BT 3%; Joe 2%; TAM 304 9%; TriMV: BT 7%; Joe 8%; and TAM 304 10%). Plants infected with mixed viruses showed more pronounced WSM symptoms compared to individual infections. However, both viruses were present only in a few plants (BT: 2%, Joe: 1%, and TAM 304: 4%). Taken together, this study showed that TriMV was transmitted vertically at a higher frequency than WSMV in resistant cultivars, and the seed transmission of TriMV with WSMV increased the virulence of both pathogens (measured via WSM symptom severity) in the emerged plants. Furthermore, Wsm1 and Wsm2 genes considerably reduced WSMV transmission via infected seeds. However, no such effects were observed on TriMV, especially in progeny plants. These results reiterated the importance of planting clean seeds and highlighted the immediate need to identify/develop new sources of TriMV resistance to effectively manage the recurring WSM epidemic. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Plant Viruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop