Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Pengchongjian watershed

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 6179 KiB  
Article
Application of a Digital Filter Method to Separate Baseflow in the Small Watershed of Pengchongjian in Southern China
by Zheng Liu, Shiyu Liu, Jingping Ye, Fei Sheng, Kunming You, Xinhao Xiong and Guilin Lai
Forests 2019, 10(12), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/f10121065 - 22 Nov 2019
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5201
Abstract
Baseflow plays a crucial role in maintaining the stability of streamflows, especially in watersheds. To reveal the evolution of baseflow in watersheds in southern China, this study investigated the variation in baseflow across the small watershed of Pengchongjian in Jiangxi Province. A digital [...] Read more.
Baseflow plays a crucial role in maintaining the stability of streamflows, especially in watersheds. To reveal the evolution of baseflow in watersheds in southern China, this study investigated the variation in baseflow across the small watershed of Pengchongjian in Jiangxi Province. A digital filter method was applied to separate baseflow from local daily streamflow records for 1983–2014 using different values of filtering parameter (β) and filtering times (T). The separation results were validated by the baseflow index (BFI) method to determine the optimal parameters. When β = 0.90 and T = 2, the baseflow separation results conformed to the actual field situation in the watershed. The average monthly baseflow increased at first and then decreased, being unevenly distribution within a year, whereas average monthly BFI followed the opposite trend. On the seasonal scale, baseflow was ranked as spring > summer > winter > autumn, and the BFI as winter > spring > autumn > summer. Both the annual baseflow and BFI decreased at a rate of 2.30 mm/year and 0.0005/year, respectively. When considered on the annual scale, the BFI was lower in the wet years and higher in the dry years compared with normal years, averaging 0.22 in the watershed for the 1983–2014 period. This study obtained key optimal parameters for baseflow separation and revealed baseflow variation in the Pengchongjian watershed. These results provide a useful reference for studying the patterns of baseflow evolution in watersheds in southern China. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 3608 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Assessment of Surface Runoff and Base Flow Response to Multiple Factors in Pengchongjian Small Watershed
by Lei Ouyang, Shiyu Liu, Jingping Ye, Zheng Liu, Fei Sheng, Rong Wang and Zhihong Lu
Forests 2018, 9(9), 553; https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090553 - 10 Sep 2018
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4865
Abstract
Quantifying the impacts of multiple factors on surface runoff and base flow is essential for understanding the mechanism of hydrological response and local water resources management as well as preventing floods and droughts. Despite previous studies on quantitative impacts of multiple factors on [...] Read more.
Quantifying the impacts of multiple factors on surface runoff and base flow is essential for understanding the mechanism of hydrological response and local water resources management as well as preventing floods and droughts. Despite previous studies on quantitative impacts of multiple factors on runoff, there is still a need for assessment of the influence of these factors on both surface runoff and base flow in different temporal scales at the watershed level. The main objective of this paper was to quantify the influence of precipitation variation, evapotranspiration (ET) and vegetation restoration on surface runoff and base flow using empirical statistics and slope change ratio of cumulative quantities (SCRCQ) methods in Pengchongjian small watershed (116°25′48″–116°27′7″ E, 29°31′44″–29°32′56″ N, 2.9 km2), China. The results indicated that, the contribution rates of precipitation variation, ET and vegetation restoration to surface runoff were 42.1%, 28.5%, 29.4% in spring; 45.0%, 37.1%, 17.9% in summer; 30.1%, 29.4%, 40.5% in autumn; 16.7%, 35.1%, 48.2% in winter; and 35.0%, 38.7%, 26.3% in annual scale, respectively. For base flow they were 33.1%, 41.9%, 25.0% in spring; 39.3%, 51.9%, 8.8% in summer; 40.2%, 38.2%, 21.6% in autumn; 24.3%, 39.4%, 36.3% in winter; and 24.4%, 47.9%, 27.7% in annual scale, respectively. Overall, climatic factors, including precipitation and ET change, affect surface runoff generation the most, while ET affects the dynamic change of annual base flowthe most. This study highlights the importance of optimizing forest management to protect the water resource. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Afforestation and Reforestation: Drivers, Dynamics, and Impacts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop