Search Results (4)

This study treated the NaOH component in red mud sludge, an industrial by-product generated at 300,000 tons annually in Korea, with sulfuric and nitric acids to produce NaSO₄ and NaNO₃, respectively. The effects of acid-treated liquid red mud (LRM) on the hydration reactions and early strength development in cement mortar were investigated. Properties such as flow, setting time, hydration heat, and compressive strength were evaluated alongside hydration product analysis using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The neutralization of LRM stabilized the pH between 7 and 8. Mortars containing neutralized red mud (NRM) and sulfuric-treated red mud (SRM) exhibited shorter initial setting times and similar final setting times compared to untreated red mud (LM). After one day, XRD confirmed the presence of Ca(OH)₂ in NRM and SRM but not in LM, while SEM revealed reduced pore sizes in NRM and SRM. Depending on dosage, the compressive strength of SRM increased by 35–60% compared to Plain mortar. These results demonstrate that LRM treated with nitric or sulfuric acid has significant potential as a setting accelerator for cement mortar. Full article

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent inflammatory condition of the nasal and paranasal mucosa that significantly impacts the quality of life. Postoperative inflammation and polyp recurrence remain common despite advances in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), prompting interest in localized corticosteroid delivery systems. This review analyzes bioresorbable steroid-releasing implants and corticosteroid-impregnated nasal dressings, focusing on their pharmacologic mechanisms, safety, and clinical outcomes. A synthesis of findings from randomized trials and observational studies was performed, with emphasis on devices such as Propel™, NasoPore, Merocel, SinuBand FP, and gel-based dressings. The Propel implant demonstrated robust evidence for reducing adhesions and inflammation with negligible systemic absorption. NasoPore and Merocel provided structural support and localized steroid delivery but lacked controlled-release kinetics. Gel-based dressings and SinuBand FP offered anatomic adaptability, with limited systemic effects. Some methods showed systemic steroid exposure in cortisol monitoring. Corticosteroid-releasing devices enhance ESS outcomes through localized therapy. While Propel is the most validated, other devices remain viable alternatives in specific clinical contexts. Comprehensive safety monitoring and standardized trials are essential to optimize their integration into postoperative care. Full article

The domestic donkey is a unique equid species with specific nutritional requirements, however, limited laboratory evidences are available to address the digestibility contribution of the prececum in relation to the total digestive tract. In the present study, six caecum-fistulated adult female Xinjiang donkeys served as the experimental animals in a 3 × 3 Latin square design, and mobile nylon bag technique was applied to determine the effect of dietary F:C ratio on pre-caececum and total digestive tract digestibility of rice straw, alfalfa hay, corn meal, and soybean meal. The dietary treatments included: (1) HF, a high-fiber ration (F:C = 80:20), (2) MF, a medium-fiber ration (F:C = 55:45), and (3), LF, a low-fiber ration (F:C = 35:65). The experiment consisted of three consecutive Latin square periods, and each period lasted 25 days. In each period, the animals were administrated naso-gastrically nylon bags (38 μm pore size) containing aforementioned feeds. After 1.5 h intubation, the bags were checked once an hour and collected at the ileo-caecal junction (small intestine bag, D1) and in the feces (fecal bag, D2). Regardless whatever feeds were introduced, the percentage of bag collected (BC) was quadratically (HF) or linearly (MF and LF) increased against different fixed bag collection time. The highest BC occurred in MF (73.8%), but no significant difference was observed between HF (62.3%) and LF (50.8%). The lowest mean bag retention time was observed in HF (2.7 h), and no significant difference occurred between MF (4.6 h) and LF (5.0 h) diets. For each feed, D1 and D2 digestibility for DM, CP, NDF, and ADF did not differ among three dietary treatments (p > 0.05). Regardless of whatever diets were fed to the donkeys, D2 digestibility for DM and CP among the feeds ranked as: soybean meal > corn meal > alfalfa hay > rice straw (p < 0.01). D1 digestibility for DM among the feeds ranked as: corn meal > soybean meal > alfalfa hay > rice straw (p < 0.01). D1 digestibility for CP among the feeds ranked as: soybean meal > corn meal > alfalfa hay > rice straw (p < 0.01). In summary, dietary forage: concentrate ratio did not affect pre-caecal or total tract nutrient digestibility. The fiber level in feeds was the main limiting factor to affect the digestibility contribution of the pre-caecum in relation to the total digestive tract. Full article

Introduction: The use of biomaterials to improve wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is not new. Many types of resorbable and non-resorbable materials have been tried as a middle meatal (MM) dressing, spacer, or stent to prevent lateralization of the middle turbinate, formation of synechia, granulation tissue, adhesions and scarring. The FDA has recently approved Chitosan-based nasal dressing/spacers which have optimal wound healing characteristics, including hemostatic and bacteriostatic properties. Herein, we compare a new chitosan-based biomaterial to a popular fully synthetic resorbable dressing in patients undergoing ESS. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was performed comparing a new Chitosan-based bioresorbable nasal dressing (Posi-Sep X) against a previously studied and well known fully synthetic polyurethane-based control (Nasopore). Post-operative outcome metrics included the degree of crusting, amount of retained implant, patient comfort, wound healing, epistaxis, and post-operative infection at two weeks. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled and a total seventy implants were placed (n = 70) at the completion of ESS. The results show a statistically significant difference between the Chitosan-based product and the control with respect to wound healing, degree of crusting, and resorption profile. In addition, the Chitosan-based dressing had a markedly lower requirement for post-operative debridement, and a lower incidence of epistaxis and infection, which corresponds to superior patient comfort. Conclusion: Our study is consistent with the biomaterials literature regarding the potential advantages of Chitosan-based MM dressings after ESS regarding improved wound healing, biocompatibility, and patient comfort. Full article