Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Maerkang Ms6.0 earthquake swarm

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 3833 KiB  
Article
Fast 1-D Velocity Optimization Inversion to 3D Velocity Imaging: A Case Study of Sichuan Maerkang Earthquake Swarm in 2022
by Xinxin Yin, Xiaoyue Zhang, Run Cai, Haibo Wang and Feng Liu
Sustainability 2022, 14(23), 15909; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315909 - 29 Nov 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2298
Abstract
To obtain an accurate one-dimensional velocity model, we developed the EA_VELEST method based on the evolutionary algorithm and the VELEST program. This method can quickly generate a suitable 1D velocity model and finally input it into the 3D velocity inversion process using the [...] Read more.
To obtain an accurate one-dimensional velocity model, we developed the EA_VELEST method based on the evolutionary algorithm and the VELEST program. This method can quickly generate a suitable 1D velocity model and finally input it into the 3D velocity inversion process using the TomoDD method. We adopt TomoDD methods to inverse the high-resolution three-dimension velocity structure and relative earthquake hypocenters for this sequence. This system processing flow was applied to the Sichuan Maerkang earthquake swarm in 2022. By collecting the seismic phase data of the Maerkang area between 1 January 2009 and 15 June 2022, we relocated the historical earthquakes in the area and obtained accurate 3D velocity imaging results. The relocated hypocenters reveal a SE-trending secondary fault, which is located ~5 km NW of the Songgang fault. In the first ten-hour of the sequence, events clearly down-dip migrated toward the SE direction. The inverted velocity structure indicates that the majority of earthquakes during the sequence occurred along the boundaries of the high and low-velocity zones or high and low-VP/VS anomalies. Especially both the two largest earthquakes, MS 5.8 and MS 6.0, occurred at the discontinuities of high and low-velocity zones. The EA_VELEST method proposed in this paper is a novel method that has played a very good enlightenment role in the optimization of the one-dimensional velocity model in geophysics and has certain reference significance. The 3D velocity results obtained in this paper and the analysis of tectonic significance provide a reference for the seismogenic environment of this Maerkang earthquake and the deep 3D velocity of the Ganzi block. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4339 KiB  
Viewpoint
The Seismo-Ionospheric Disturbances before the 9 June 2022 Maerkang Ms6.0 Earthquake Swarm
by Jiang Liu, Xuemin Zhang, Weiwei Wu, Cong Chen, Mingming Wang, Muping Yang, Yufan Guo and Jun Wang
Atmosphere 2022, 13(11), 1745; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111745 - 23 Oct 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2948
Abstract
Based on the multi-data of the global ionospheric map (GIM), ionospheric total electron content (TEC) inversed from GPS observations, the critical frequency of the F2 layer (fOF2) from the ionosonde, electron density (Ne), electron temperature (Te), and He+ [...] Read more.
Based on the multi-data of the global ionospheric map (GIM), ionospheric total electron content (TEC) inversed from GPS observations, the critical frequency of the F2 layer (fOF2) from the ionosonde, electron density (Ne), electron temperature (Te), and He+ and O+ densities detected by the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES), the temporal and spatial characteristics of ionospheric multi-parameter perturbations were analyzed around the Maerkang Ms6.0 earthquake swarm on 9 June 2022. The results showed that the seismo-ionospheric disturbances were observed during 2–4 June around the epicenter under quiet solar-geomagnetic conditions. All parameters we studied were characterized by synchronous changes and negative anomalies, with a better consistency between ionospheric ground-based and satellite observations. The negative ionospheric anomalies for all parameters appeared 5–7 days before the Maerkang Ms6.0 earthquake swarm can be considered as significant signals of upcoming main shock. The seismo-ionospheric coupling mechanism may be a combination of two coupling channels: an overlapped DC electric field and an acoustic gravity wave, as described by the lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling (LAIC). In addition, in order to make the investigations still more convincing, we completed a statistical analysis for the ionospheric anomalies of earthquakes over Ms6.0 in the study area (20°~40° N, 92°~112° E) from 1 January 2019 to 1 July 2022. The nine seismic events reveal that most strong earthquakes are preceded by obvious synchronous anomalies from ground-based and satellite ionospheric observations. The anomalous disturbances generally appear 1–15 days before the earthquakes, and the continuity and reliability of ground-based ionospheric anomaly detection are relatively high. Based on the integrated ionospheric satellite–ground observations, a cross-validation analysis can effectively improve the confidence level of anomaly identification and reduce the frequency of false anomalies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop