Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Letibotulinum toxin A

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 10456 KB  
Article
Efficacy and Safety of Letibotulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Melasma in Two Different Dilutions: A Randomized Double-Blind Split-Face Study
by Juthapa Pongklaokam, Woraphong Manuskiatti, Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha, Pitchaya Maneeprasopchoke, Panwadee Thongjaroensirikul, Yanin Nokdhes, Rona Maria R. Abad-Constantino, Woramate Bhorntarakcharoen, Sariya Sittiwanaruk and Thanya Techapichetvanich
Toxins 2025, 17(7), 349; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17070349 - 11 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 6101
Abstract
Background: Melasma is an acquired hyperpigmentation disorder with multifactorial etiologies and limited response to conventional therapies. Recent evidence suggests that Botulinum Toxin A (BoNT-A) may modulate ultraviolet (UV)-induced pigmentation and offer therapeutic benefits. Objective: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of [...] Read more.
Background: Melasma is an acquired hyperpigmentation disorder with multifactorial etiologies and limited response to conventional therapies. Recent evidence suggests that Botulinum Toxin A (BoNT-A) may modulate ultraviolet (UV)-induced pigmentation and offer therapeutic benefits. Objective: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two intradermal dilutions of Letibotulinum toxin A (LetiBoNT-A) in Thai patients with melasma. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, split-face study, 30 participants aged 32–62 years received a single intradermal injection of LetiBoNT-A, with 20 units administered per cheek. A 1:5 dilution was injected on one side of the face, and a 1:10 dilution was injected on the contralateral side. Outcomes were evaluated over a 6-month period using the Hemi-modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (Hemi-mMASI), VISIA® brown spot analysis, and quantitative assessments of skin texture. Results: Both dilutions significantly improved Hemi-mMASI scores (1:5, p = 0.043; 1:10, p = 0.002) and brown spots (1:5, p = 0.002; 1:10, p < 0.001). The 1:10 dilution showed earlier and more sustained improvements. Subgroup analysis revealed greater reductions in Hemi-mMASI scores among patients with telangiectatic melasma, particularly with the 1:10 dilution, though they were not statistically significant. Additionally, the 1:10 dilution significantly reduced pore volume, pore area, and sebum levels. One case of transient facial asymmetry was reported with the 1:5 dilution. Conclusions: LetiBoNT-A is a safe and effective adjunct in melasma treatment. The 1:10 dilution offered superior clinical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Evolving Role of Botulinum Toxin in Clinical Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1732 KB  
Article
Efficacy and Safety of Letibotulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Dynamic Equinus Foot Deformity in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Hyun Jung Chang, Bo Young Hong, Sang-Jee Lee, Soyoung Lee, Joo Hyun Park and Jeong-Yi Kwon
Toxins 2017, 9(8), 252; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9080252 - 18 Aug 2017
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 6697
Abstract
The objective of this clinical trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of letibotulinum toxin A and onabotulinum toxin A for improving dynamic equinus foot deformity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). In total, 144 children with spastic CP who had dynamic [...] Read more.
The objective of this clinical trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of letibotulinum toxin A and onabotulinum toxin A for improving dynamic equinus foot deformity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). In total, 144 children with spastic CP who had dynamic equinus foot deformity were assigned randomly to the Botulax group (injection of letibotulinum toxin A) or the Botox group (injection of onabotulinum toxin A). The Physician’s Rating Scale (PRS), ankle plantar flexor spasticity using the Modified Tardieu Scale, the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)-88, and the GMFM-66 were completed before injection and at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after injection. The PRS responder rate was 60.27% in the Botulax group and 61.43% in the Botox group at 12 weeks after treatment, and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the between-group difference in responder rates was −17.16%, higher than the non-inferiority margin of −24.00%. The clinical efficacy and the safety profiles of the groups did not significantly differ. The results suggest that injection of letibotulinum toxin A is as effective and safe as that of onabotulinum toxin A for the treatment of dynamic equinus foot deformity in children with spastic CP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Botulinum Neurotoxins Antibody and Vaccine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop