Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Inoue Tetsujirō

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 344 KiB  
Article
Yokoi Shōnan and Yangming Philosophy: A Clarification of Misunderstandings
by Ying Huang
Religions 2024, 15(12), 1550; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121550 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1174
Abstract
In modern Japanese academia, the view has been proposed that Yokoi Shōnan “gained insights from Wang Yangming’s teachings and promoted practical learning 有得于王学而兴实学”, suggesting that his ideas on practical learning were influenced by Yangmingism. However, proponents of this theory have not provided strong [...] Read more.
In modern Japanese academia, the view has been proposed that Yokoi Shōnan “gained insights from Wang Yangming’s teachings and promoted practical learning 有得于王学而兴实学”, suggesting that his ideas on practical learning were influenced by Yangmingism. However, proponents of this theory have not provided strong evidence to prove a connection between Yokoi Shōnan’s practical thought and Yangmingism. From Yokoi Shōnan’s writings, his attitude toward Yangmingism was largely critical. In fact, the formation of Yokoi Shōnan’s ideas on practical thought underwent a rather complex process, shaped by his experiences with domain school reforms, interactions with various Japanese intellectuals during his period of study abroad, his understanding of Western culture, and discussions in practical learning study groups. Therefore, attributing his inclination toward practical thought solely to the influence of a single ideology would be overly simplistic. Full article
22 pages, 425 KiB  
Article
The Roots of Ambivalence: Makiguchi Tsunesaburō’s Heterodox Discourse and Praxis of “Religion”
by Andrew Gebert
Religions 2022, 13(3), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030260 - 18 Mar 2022
Viewed by 3735
Abstract
In the post-World War II era, Sōka Gakkai has deployed the terminology and concept of “religion” (shūkyō 宗教) in a variety of contexts and to a variety of ends. Do these positions simply reflect a post-war strategic stance? Do they have deeper [...] Read more.
In the post-World War II era, Sōka Gakkai has deployed the terminology and concept of “religion” (shūkyō 宗教) in a variety of contexts and to a variety of ends. Do these positions simply reflect a post-war strategic stance? Do they have deeper historical and philosophical roots? A careful reading of key texts by founding president Makiguchi Tsunesaburō 牧口常三郎 (1871–1944) suggests that, from its inception as the Value-Creating Education Society (Sōka Kyōiku Gakkai 創価教育学会) in the 1930s, the movement has occupied an ambiguous space, relative to the conceptualization and practice of “religion”, as these were imported at the start of the Meiji Era (1868–1912), adopted and indigenized to respond to the cultural, social and political exigencies of modernizing Japan. Examples of Makiguchi’s heterodoxy, relative to the established understanding of “religion” and its role, include: the rejection of specific ideas of “religion”, in relation to education and science, as represented in the writings of such intellectuals as Inoue Tetsujirō 井上哲次郎 and Ishiwara Atsushi 石原純; refusal to accept the official definition of Shintō as non-religion; positing an essential continuity between faith/trust among human subjects and faith directed at ideas and objects typically considered “religious”; promoting the idea of worldly benefit, as a result of faith in and practice of “religion”. A careful reading of Makiguchi’s complex, and often heterodox, discourse, relative to the conceptual category of “religion”, can frame a more nuanced interpretation of his ultimate heterodoxy—his rejection of the Ise Shrine amulet, an act for which he was arrested and confined to prison in July 1943. It can also clarify the basis for the Sōka Gakkai’s post-war deployments of the concept of religion, and create a more flexible and expansive interpretative space for considering the organization’s discourse and praxis in the post-war era. Full article
Back to TopTop