Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GNSS-Assisted Aerial Triangulation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 12503 KB  
Article
Enhancing Regional Quasi-Geoid Refinement Precision: An Analytical Approach Employing ADS80 Tri-Linear Array Stereoscopic Imagery and GNSS Gravity-Potential Leveling
by Wei Xu, Gang Chen, Defang Yang, Kaihua Ding, Rendong Dong, Xuyan Ma, Sipeng Han, Shengpeng Zhang and Yongyin Zhang
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(16), 2984; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162984 - 14 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1923
Abstract
This research investigates precision enhancement in regional quasi-geoid refinement through ADS80 tri-linear array scanning stereoscopic imagery for aerial triangulation coupled with GNSS gravity-potential modeling. By acquiring stereoscopic imagery and analyzing triangulation accuracy using an ADS80 camera, we performed this study over the Qinghai–Tibet [...] Read more.
This research investigates precision enhancement in regional quasi-geoid refinement through ADS80 tri-linear array scanning stereoscopic imagery for aerial triangulation coupled with GNSS gravity-potential modeling. By acquiring stereoscopic imagery and analyzing triangulation accuracy using an ADS80 camera, we performed this study over the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau’s elevated, desolate terrain, collecting 593 GNSS points following high-precision stereoscopic imagery modeling. By utilizing 12 gravity satellite models, we computed geoid heights and China’s 1985 Yellow Sea elevations for 28 benchmarks and GNSS points, thereby refining the Qinghai Province Quasi-Geoid Model (QPQM) using geometric techniques. The findings reveal that POS-assisted ADS80 stereoscopic imagery yields high-precision triangulation with maximal horizontal and elevation accuracies of 0.083/0.116 cm and 0.053/0.09 cm, respectively, across five control point arrangements. The RMSE of normal heights for 1985, processed via these GNSS points, achieved decimeter precision. By applying error corrections from benchmarks to the 1985 elevation data from gravity satellites and performing weighted averaging, the precision of EGM2008, SGG-UGM-2, and SGG-UGM-1 models improved to 8.61 cm, 9.09 cm, and 9.38 cm, respectively, surpassing the QPQM by 9.22 cm to 9.99 cm. This research demonstrates that the proposed methods can significantly enhance the precision of regional quasi-geoid surfaces. Additionally, these methods offer a novel approach for rapidly establishing regional quasi-geoid models in the uninhabited areas of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2642 KB  
Article
Influence of On-Site Camera Calibration with Sub-Block of Images on the Accuracy of Spatial Data Obtained by PPK-Based UAS Photogrammetry
by Kalima Pitombeira and Edson Mitishita
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(12), 3126; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123126 - 15 Jun 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2356
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Photogrammetry has become widely used for spatial data acquisition. Nowadays, RTK (Real Time Kinematic) and PPK (Post Processed Kinematic) are the main correction methods for accurate positioning used for direct measurements of camera station coordinates in UAS imagery. Thus, [...] Read more.
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Photogrammetry has become widely used for spatial data acquisition. Nowadays, RTK (Real Time Kinematic) and PPK (Post Processed Kinematic) are the main correction methods for accurate positioning used for direct measurements of camera station coordinates in UAS imagery. Thus, 3D camera coordinates are commonly used as additional observations in Bundle Block Adjustment to perform Global Navigation Satellite System-Assisted Aerial Triangulation (GNSS-AAT). This process requires accurate Interior Orientation Parameters to ensure the quality of photogrammetric intersection. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of on-site camera calibration with a sub-block of images on the accuracy of spatial data obtained by PPK-based UAS Photogrammetry. For this purpose, experiments of on-the-job camera self-calibration in the Metashape software with the SfM approach were performed. Afterward, experiments of GNSS-Assisted Aerial Triangulation with on-site calibration in the Erdas Imagine software were performed. The outcomes show that only the experiment of GNSS-AAT with three Ground Control Points yielded horizontal and vertical accuracies close to nominal precisions of the camera station positions by GNSS-PPK measurements adopted in this study, showing horizontal RMSE (Root-Mean Square Error) of 0.222 m and vertical RMSE of 0.154 m. Furthermore, the on-site camera calibration with a sub-block of images significantly improved the vertical accuracy of the spatial information extraction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 13045 KB  
Article
GNSS/INS-Assisted Structure from Motion Strategies for UAV-Based Imagery over Mechanized Agricultural Fields
by Seyyed Meghdad Hasheminasab, Tian Zhou and Ayman Habib
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(3), 351; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030351 - 21 Jan 2020
Cited by 52 | Viewed by 6620
Abstract
Acquired imagery by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has been widely used for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction/modeling in various digital agriculture applications, such as phenotyping, crop monitoring, and yield prediction. 3D reconstruction from well-textured UAV-based images has matured and the user community has access to [...] Read more.
Acquired imagery by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has been widely used for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction/modeling in various digital agriculture applications, such as phenotyping, crop monitoring, and yield prediction. 3D reconstruction from well-textured UAV-based images has matured and the user community has access to several commercial and opensource tools that provide accurate products at a high level of automation. However, in some applications, such as digital agriculture, due to repetitive image patterns, these approaches are not always able to produce reliable/complete products. The main limitation of these techniques is their inability to establish a sufficient number of correctly matched features among overlapping images, causing incomplete and/or inaccurate 3D reconstruction. This paper provides two structure from motion (SfM) strategies, which use trajectory information provided by an onboard survey-grade global navigation satellite system/inertial navigation system (GNSS/INS) and system calibration parameters. The main difference between the proposed strategies is that the first one—denoted as partially GNSS/INS-assisted SfM—implements the four stages of an automated triangulation procedure, namely, imaging matching, relative orientation parameters (ROPs) estimation, exterior orientation parameters (EOPs) recovery, and bundle adjustment (BA). The second strategy— denoted as fully GNSS/INS-assisted SfM—removes the EOPs estimation step while introducing a random sample consensus (RANSAC)-based strategy for removing matching outliers before the BA stage. Both strategies modify the image matching by restricting the search space for conjugate points. They also implement a linear procedure for ROPs’ refinement. Finally, they use the GNSS/INS information in modified collinearity equations for a simpler BA procedure that could be used for refining system calibration parameters. Eight datasets over six agricultural fields are used to evaluate the performance of the developed strategies. In comparison with a traditional SfM framework and Pix4D Mapper Pro, the proposed strategies are able to generate denser and more accurate 3D point clouds as well as orthophotos without any gaps. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

22 pages, 9216 KB  
Article
Quality Assessment of DSMs Produced from UAV Flights Georeferenced with On-Board RTK Positioning
by Gianfranco Forlani, Elisa Dall’Asta, Fabrizio Diotri, Umberto Morra di Cella, Riccardo Roncella and Marina Santise
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(2), 311; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020311 - 17 Feb 2018
Cited by 230 | Viewed by 14498
Abstract
High-resolution Digital Surface Models (DSMs) from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) imagery with accuracy better than 10 cm open new possibilities in geosciences and engineering. The accuracy of such DSMs depends on the number and distribution of ground control points (GCPs). Placing and measuring [...] Read more.
High-resolution Digital Surface Models (DSMs) from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) imagery with accuracy better than 10 cm open new possibilities in geosciences and engineering. The accuracy of such DSMs depends on the number and distribution of ground control points (GCPs). Placing and measuring GCPs are often the most time-consuming on-site tasks in a UAV project. Safety or accessibility concerns may impede their proper placement, so either costlier techniques must be used, or a less accurate DSM is obtained. Photogrammetric blocks flown by drones with on-board receivers capable of RTK (real-time kinematic) positioning do not need GCPs, as camera stations at exposure time can be determined with cm-level accuracy, and used to georeference the block and control its deformations. This paper presents an experimental investigation on the repeatability of DSM generation from several blocks acquired with a RTK-enabled drone, where differential corrections were sent from a local master station or a network of Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS). Four different flights for each RTK mode were executed over a test field, according to the same flight plan. DSM generation was performed with three block control configurations: GCP only, camera stations only, and with camera stations and one GCP. The results show that irrespective of the RTK mode, the first and third configurations provide the best DSM inner consistency. The average range of the elevation discrepancies among the DSMs in such cases is about 6 cm (2.5 GSD, ground sampling density) for a 10-cm resolution DSM. Using camera stations only, the average range is almost twice as large (4.7 GSD). The average DSM accuracy, which was verified on checkpoints, turned out to be about 2.1 GSD with the first and third configurations, and 3.7 GSD with camera stations only. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop