Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = FCAZ

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 6999 KiB  
Article
Development of the Algorithmic Basis of the FCAZ Method for Earthquake-Prone Area Recognition
by Sergey M. Agayan, Boris A. Dzeboev, Shamil R. Bogoutdinov, Ivan O. Belov, Boris V. Dzeranov and Dmitriy A. Kamaev
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(4), 2496; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042496 - 15 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1432
Abstract
The present paper continues the series of publications by the authors devoted to solving the problem of recognition regions with potential high seismicity. It is aimed at the development of the mathematical apparatus and the algorithmic base of the FCAZ method, designed for [...] Read more.
The present paper continues the series of publications by the authors devoted to solving the problem of recognition regions with potential high seismicity. It is aimed at the development of the mathematical apparatus and the algorithmic base of the FCAZ method, designed for effective recognition of earthquake-prone areas. A detailed description of both the mathematical algorithms included in the FCAZ in its original form and those developed in this paper is given. Using California as an example, it is shown that a significantly developed algorithmic FCAZ base makes it possible to increase the reliability and accuracy of FCAZ recognition. In particular, a number of small zones located at a fairly small distance from each other but having a close “internal” connection are being connected into single large, high-seismicity areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning Applications in Seismology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4482 KiB  
Article
Strong Earthquake-Prone Areas in the Eastern Sector of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation
by Alexei D. Gvishiani, Boris A. Dzeboev, Boris V. Dzeranov, Ernest O. Kedrov, Anna A. Skorkina and Izabella M. Nikitina
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 11990; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311990 - 23 Nov 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2170
Abstract
This paper continues the series of publications by the authors on the recognition of areas prone to the strongest, strong, and significant earthquakes using the FCAZ system-analytical method. The areas prone to earthquakes with M ≥ 5.5 in the eastern sector of the [...] Read more.
This paper continues the series of publications by the authors on the recognition of areas prone to the strongest, strong, and significant earthquakes using the FCAZ system-analytical method. The areas prone to earthquakes with M ≥ 5.5 in the eastern sector of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation were recognized. It is shown that certain potential high seismicity zones are well confined to the boundaries of the Eurasian, North American, and Okhotsk tectonic plates. In addition, according to the results of the FCAZ recognition, some areas located at a sufficient distance from the main tectonic structures of the studied region were also recognized as highly seismic. The results of the study, among other factors, justify the use of the assessment of the completeness magnitude in the catalog for choosing the set of recognition objects for the FCAZ method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Geoinformatics and Data Mining in Earth Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 10727 KiB  
Article
System-Analytical Method of Earthquake-Prone Areas Recognition
by Boris A. Dzeboev, Alexei D. Gvishiani, Sergey M. Agayan, Ivan O. Belov, Jon K. Karapetyan, Boris V. Dzeranov and Yuliya V. Barykina
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(17), 7972; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11177972 - 28 Aug 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3362
Abstract
Typically, strong earthquakes do not occur over the entire territory of the seismically active region. Recognition of areas where they may occur is a critical step in seismic hazard assessment studies. For half a century, the Earthquake-Prone Areas (EPA) approach, developed by the [...] Read more.
Typically, strong earthquakes do not occur over the entire territory of the seismically active region. Recognition of areas where they may occur is a critical step in seismic hazard assessment studies. For half a century, the Earthquake-Prone Areas (EPA) approach, developed by the famous Soviet academicians I.M. Gelfand and V.I. Keilis-Borok, was used to recognize areas prone to strong earthquakes. For the modern development of ideas that form the basis of the EPA method, new mathematical methods of pattern recognition are proposed. They were developed by the authors to overcome the difficulties that arise today when using the EPA approach in its classic version. So, firstly, a scheme for the recognition of high seismicity disjunctive nodes and the vicinities of axis intersections of the morphostructural lineaments was created with only one high seismicity learning class. Secondly, the system-analytical method FCAZ (Formalized Clustering and Zoning) has been developed. It uses the epicenters of fairly weak earthquakes as recognition objects. This makes it possible to develop the recognition result of areas prone to strong earthquakes after the appearance of epicenters of new weak earthquakes and, thereby, to repeatedly correct the results over time. It is shown that the creation of the FCAZ method for the first time made it possible to consider the classical problem of earthquake-prone areas recognition from the point of view of advanced systems analysis. The new mathematical recognition methods proposed in the article have made it possible to successfully identify earthquake-prone areas on the continents of North and South America, Eurasia, and in the subduction zones of the Pacific Rim. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop