Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = F508del (p.Phe508del)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 1424 KiB  
Guidelines
Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
by Meghan E. McGarry, Karen S. Raraigh, Philip Farrell, Faith Shropshire, Karey Padding, Cambrey White, M. Christine Dorley, Steven Hicks, Clement L. Ren, Kathryn Tullis, Debra Freedenberg, Q. Eileen Wafford, Sarah E. Hempstead, Marissa A. Taylor, Albert Faro, Marci K. Sontag and Susanna A. McColley
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11(2), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020024 - 2 Apr 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 6608
Abstract
Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been universal in the US since 2010; however, there is significant variation among newborn screening algorithms. Systematic reviews were used to develop seven recommendations for newborn screening program practices to improve timeliness, sensitivity, and equity in [...] Read more.
Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been universal in the US since 2010; however, there is significant variation among newborn screening algorithms. Systematic reviews were used to develop seven recommendations for newborn screening program practices to improve timeliness, sensitivity, and equity in diagnosing infants with CF: (1) The CF Foundation recommends the use of a floating immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cutoff over a fixed IRT cutoff; (2) The CF Foundation recommends using a very high IRT referral strategy in CF newborn screening programs whose variant panel does not include all CF-causing variants in CFTR2 or does not have a variant panel that achieves at least 95% sensitivity in all ancestral groups within the state; (3) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening algorithms should not limit CFTR variant detection to the F508del variant or variants included in the American College of Medical Genetics-23 panel; (4) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening programs screen for all CF-causing CFTR variants in CFTR2; (5) The CF Foundation recommends conducting CFTR variant screening twice weekly or more frequently as resources allow; (6) The CF Foundation recommends the inclusion of a CFTR sequencing tier following IRT and CFTR variant panel testing to improve the specificity and positive predictive value of CF newborn screening; (7) The CF Foundation recommends that both the primary care provider and the CF specialist be notified of abnormal newborn screening results. Through implementation, it is anticipated that these recommendations will result in improved sensitivity, equity, and timeliness of CF newborn screening, leading to improved health outcomes for all individuals diagnosed with CF following newborn screening and a decreased burden on families. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 213 KiB  
Communication
Russian Regional Differences in Allele Frequencies of CFTR Gene Variants: Genetic Monitoring of Infertile Couples
by Andrey S. Glotov, Vyacheslav B. Chernykh, Olga A. Solovova, Aleksander V. Polyakov, Maksim Yu. Donnikov, Ludmila V. Kovalenko, Yury A. Barbitoff, Yulia A. Nasykhova, Tatyana E. Lazareva and Oleg S. Glotov
Genes 2024, 15(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15010045 - 27 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1533
Abstract
A male factor, commonly associated with poor semen quality, is revealed in about 50% of infertile couples. CFTR gene (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conduction Regulator) variants are one of the common genetic causes of azoospermia-related male infertility. Notably, the spectrum and frequency of pathogenic [...] Read more.
A male factor, commonly associated with poor semen quality, is revealed in about 50% of infertile couples. CFTR gene (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conduction Regulator) variants are one of the common genetic causes of azoospermia-related male infertility. Notably, the spectrum and frequency of pathogenic CFTR variants vary between populations and geographical regions. In this work, we made an attempt to evaluate the allele frequency (AF) of 12 common CFTR variants in infertile Russian men and healthy individuals from different districts of Russia. Because of the limited number of population-based studies on Russian individuals, we characterized the population AFs based on data from the Registry of Russian cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. In addition to the CF patient registry, we estimated the local frequencies of the same set of variants based on the results of genotyping of CF patients in local biocollections (from St. Petersburg and Yugra regions). AFs of common CFTR variants calculated based on registry and biocollection data showed good concordance with directly measured population AFs. The estimated region-specific frequencies of CFTR variants allowed us to uncover statistically significant regional differences in the frequencies of the F508del (c.1521_1523del; p.Phe508del) and CFTRdele2,3(21kb) (c.54-5940_273+10250del21kb; p.Ser18ArgfsX) variants. The data from population-based studies confirmed previous observations that F508del, CFTRdele2,3(21kb), and L138ins (c.413_415dup; p.Leu138dup)variants are the most abundant among infertile patients, and their frequencies are significantly lower in healthy individuals and should be taken into account during genetic monitoring of the reproductive health of Russian individuals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Causes of Human Infertility)
11 pages, 538 KiB  
Article
Pathogenic Variants and Genotypes of the CFTR Gene in Russian Men with Cystic Fibrosis and CBAVD Syndrome
by Vyacheslav Chernykh, Stanislav Krasovsky, Olga Solovova, Tagui Adyan, Anna Stepanova, Ekaterina Marnat, Maria Shtaut, Anna Sedova, Tatyana Sorokina, Tatyana Beskorovainaya, Elena Kondratyeva, Olga Shchagina and Aleksandr Polyakov
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(22), 16287; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216287 - 14 Nov 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2249
Abstract
Pathogenic CFTR variants cause cystic fibrosis (CF), and CF-related disorders (CF-RD), including bilateral aplasia of the vas deferens (CBAVD). The spectrum of clinical manifestations depends on the CFTR genotype. The frequency and spectrum of the CFTR variants vary between populations and clinical groups. [...] Read more.
Pathogenic CFTR variants cause cystic fibrosis (CF), and CF-related disorders (CF-RD), including bilateral aplasia of the vas deferens (CBAVD). The spectrum of clinical manifestations depends on the CFTR genotype. The frequency and spectrum of the CFTR variants vary between populations and clinical groups. CFTR variants and genotypes were analyzed in Russian men with CF (n = 546) and CBAVD syndrome (n = 125). Pathogenic variants were detected in 93.95% and 39.2% of the CF and CBAVD alleles, respectively. The most frequent c.1521_1523del (F508del; p.Phe508del) variant was found in 541 (49.5%) CF alleles. A total of 162 CFTR genotypes were revealed in CF patients, including 152 homozygous and 394 compound-heterozygous. The most common CF-genotype was F508del/F508del (24.9%). Other frequent CF-genotypes were F508del/3849+10kbC>T, F508del/CFTRdele2,3, and F508del/E92K. CF-causing variants and/or 5T allele were found in 88% of CBAVD patients: 5T/CFTRmut (48.0%), CFTRmut/N (17.6%), CFTRmut/CFTRmut (6.4%), 5T/5T (10.4%), 5T/N (5.6%) and N/N (12.0%), with the most common CBAVD-genotype being F508del/5T (29.6%). The allele frequencies of F508del, CFTRdele2,3 394delTT, and 3849+10kbC>T were significantly higher in CF patients. L138ins/L138ins, 2184insA/E92K, and L138ins/N genotypes were found in CBAVD, but not in CF patients. The results indicate certain differences in the frequency of some CFTR variants and genotypes in Russian CF and CBAVD patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2454 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Complex p.[Leu467Phe;Phe508del] CFTR Allele in the Intestinal Organoids Model: Implications for Therapy
by Elena Kondratyeva, Anna Efremova, Yuliya Melyanovskaya, Anna Voronkova, Alexander Polyakov, Nataliya Bulatenko, Tagui Adyan, Viktoriya Sherman, Valeriia Kovalskaia, Nika Petrova, Marina Starinova, Tatiana Bukharova, Sergei Kutsev and Dmitry Goldshtein
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10377; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810377 - 8 Sep 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 2665
Abstract
In the cohort of Russian patients with cystic fibrosis, the p.[Leu467Phe;Phe508del] complex allele (legacy name [L467F;F508del]) of the CFTR gene is understudied. In this research, we present the results of frequency evaluation of the [L467F;F508del] complex allele in the Russian Federation among patients [...] Read more.
In the cohort of Russian patients with cystic fibrosis, the p.[Leu467Phe;Phe508del] complex allele (legacy name [L467F;F508del]) of the CFTR gene is understudied. In this research, we present the results of frequency evaluation of the [L467F;F508del] complex allele in the Russian Federation among patients with a F508del/F508del genotype, its effect on the clinical course of cystic fibrosis, the intestinal epithelium ionic channel function, and the effectiveness of target therapy. The frequency of the [L467F;F508del] complex allele among patients with homozygous F508del was determined with multiplex ligase-dependent probe amplification followed by polymerase chain reaction and fragment analysis. The function of ionic channels, including the residual CFTR function, and the effectiveness of CFTR modulators was analyzed using intestinal current measurements on rectal biopsy samples and the forskolin-induced swelling assay on organoids. The results showed that the F508del/[L467F;F508del] genotype is present in 8.2% of all Russian patients with F508del in a homozygous state. The clinical course of the disease in patients with the F508del/[L467F;F508del] genotype is severe and does not vary from the course in the cohort with homozygous F508del, although the CFTR channel function is significantly lower. For patients with the F508del/[L467F;F508del] genotype, we can recommend targeted therapy using a combined ivacaftor + tezacaftor + elexacaftor medication. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop