Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Ebbinghaus illusion

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 1099 KiB  
Article
Prefrontal-Dependent and Gender-Specific Modulation of Guilt Emotion on Human Early Visual Perception
by Mingyang Sun and Lihong Chen
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 333; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030333 - 8 Mar 2025
Viewed by 752
Abstract
Negative emotions can shape human visual perception, which is mainly investigated using basic emotions such as fear. Whether guilt emotion, which is a negative moral emotion originating late in our evolutionary ancestry, has similar modulatory effects as basic emotions is largely unexplored. Here, [...] Read more.
Negative emotions can shape human visual perception, which is mainly investigated using basic emotions such as fear. Whether guilt emotion, which is a negative moral emotion originating late in our evolutionary ancestry, has similar modulatory effects as basic emotions is largely unexplored. Here, we employed a dot estimation task to induce feelings of guilt and subsequently measured the Ebbinghaus illusion strength. The photos of victims’ faces were projected on the central circle of the Ebbinghaus configuration. The results showed that guilt significantly strengthened the illusion effect relative to control condition, which was observed only for female participants playing with same-gender partners and reversed to the opposite pattern with disruption of left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. The findings suggest that guilt can sculpt early visual perception in a gender-specific and prefrontal-dependent manner, thus broaden our understanding of guilt emotion and have implications for relevant neuropsychiatric disorders. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1612 KiB  
Article
Geometrical Visual Illusions Revisited: The Curse of Symmetry, the Cure of Sighting, and Taxing Task Demands
by Klaus Landwehr
Symmetry 2022, 14(12), 2550; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122550 - 2 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4335
Abstract
For nine popular geometrical visual-illusion figures, a mathematical analysis is provided along with a characterization of the figures’ psychological effectiveness. Supported by graphical illustrations, for the L and the T, it is shown how mathematical singularities of these figures can be isolated, and [...] Read more.
For nine popular geometrical visual-illusion figures, a mathematical analysis is provided along with a characterization of the figures’ psychological effectiveness. Supported by graphical illustrations, for the L and the T, it is shown how mathematical singularities of these figures can be isolated, and the illusions annihilated. For the Poggendorff, the Hering, and the Zöllner figures, building on observations from Kennedy and Portal (1990), sighting the figures from specific vantage points at a shallow angle is proposed as a means to overcome these illusions. For the T, the Oppel–Kundt, the Müller–Lyer, and the Ebbinghaus figures, a new experiment demonstrated that observers were able to find a slant of the stimuli at which the illusory impressions vanished. Task demands on part of the beholders comprise discrimination and identification. The observed independence of response bias and sensitivity in psychometric functions can possibly be explained by the intrusion of identifying responses into discrimination tasks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry and Asymmetry: From Evolution to Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 587 KiB  
Article
The Prospects of Utilizing Geometrical Visual Illusions as Tools for Neuroscience
by Klaus Landwehr
Symmetry 2022, 14(8), 1687; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14081687 - 15 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3007
Abstract
Geometrical visual illusions have long been used as tools in neuroscience. Most commonly, researchers have taken illusions as a given and attempted to explain phenomenal impressions in terms of known neural mechanisms. In a psychophysical approach to this topic, it is customary to [...] Read more.
Geometrical visual illusions have long been used as tools in neuroscience. Most commonly, researchers have taken illusions as a given and attempted to explain phenomenal impressions in terms of known neural mechanisms. In a psychophysical approach to this topic, it is customary to modify stimuli until conditions for which illusions are enhanced, attenuated, or annihilated have been found. Additionally, the focus is not exclusively on response bias but equally on sensitivity, because observers may fall prey to an illusion but at the same time be able to discriminate between stimuli perfectly. For the T-figure, the length of the undivided line is usually overestimated relative to the length of the divided line, and evidence has accrued that suggests that the illusion may be due to the processing of the figure as a coherent unit (a “T-schema”). Dissecting the T or tilting its lines influenced the amount of illusion, suggesting that interactions between orientation-sensitive and end-inhibited neurons are at work. Examples of cognate research with the Ponzo, Ebbinghaus, and Müller-Lyer illusions are also discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry and Asymmetry: From Evolution to Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop