Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = DIPEx

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 670 KiB  
Article
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Clinical Decision-Making: A Qualitative Pilot Study Exploring Perspectives of Those Directly Affected, Their Next of Kin, and Treating Clinicians
by Beatrix Göcking, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Giovanna Brandi, Sophie Gloeckler and Andrea Glässel
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 3187; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043187 - 11 Feb 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2794
Abstract
Background: Exploring the experience and impact of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) from three perspectives, that of those directly affected (AFs), their next of kin (NoK), and treating clinicians, is a way to support and empower others to make informed medical decisions. Methods: In [...] Read more.
Background: Exploring the experience and impact of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) from three perspectives, that of those directly affected (AFs), their next of kin (NoK), and treating clinicians, is a way to support and empower others to make informed medical decisions. Methods: In a Swiss neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU), eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of a Database of Individual Patient Experiences (DIPEx) pilot project and thematically analyzed. Interviews were held with two clinicians, five people experiencing aSAH, and four NoK 14–21 months after the bleeding event. Results: Qualitative analysis revealed five main themes from the perspective of clinicians: emergency care, diagnosis and treatment, outcomes, everyday life in the ICU, and decision-making; seven main themes were identified for AFs and NoK: the experience of the aSAH, diagnosis and treatment, outcomes, impact on loved ones, identity, faith, religion and spirituality, and decision-making. Perspectives on decision-making were compared, and, whereas clinicians tended to focus their attention on determining treatment, AFs and NoK valued participation in shared decision-making processes. Conclusions: Overall, aSAH was perceived as a life-threatening event with various challenges depending on severity. The results suggest the need for tools that aid decision-making and better prepare AFs and NoK using accessible means and at an early stage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3625 KiB  
Article
First Insights into Barriers and Facilitators from the Perspective of Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: A Multiple Case Study
by Joelle Ott, Nikola Biller-Andorno and Andrea Glässel
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(17), 10733; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710733 - 29 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2332
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a complex, lifelong disease. Its effects span across different areas of life and vary strongly. In Switzerland, there is an intense discussion on how to optimize quality of care and patient safety. Patients should be more involved in the [...] Read more.
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a complex, lifelong disease. Its effects span across different areas of life and vary strongly. In Switzerland, there is an intense discussion on how to optimize quality of care and patient safety. Patients should be more involved in the management of health care to improve the quality of care from the patient’s perspective and form a more comprehensive perspective. This multiple-case study explores the question of how persons with MS experience and describe functioning related barriers, facilitating factors, and ethically relevant conflicts. To address this from a comprehensive perspective, the MS core set of the International Classification for Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) is used as theoretical framework. To explore barriers, facilitators, and relevant ethical issues, different narrative sources were used for thematic analysis and ICF coding: (a) MS transcripts from DIPEx interviews and (b) an autobiographical book of persons living with MS. Insights that were meaningful for daily practice and education were identified: (a) understanding the importance of environmental circumstances based on narrative sources; (b) understanding the importance of a person’s individual life situation, and the ability to switch perspectives in the medical field; (c) respect for PwMS’ individuality in health care settings; (d) creating meaningful relationships for disease management and treatment, as well as building trust. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Care from Patients' Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 395 KiB  
Article
“What Do You Need? What Are You Experiencing?” Relationship Building and Power Dynamics in Participatory Research Projects: Critical Self-Reflections of Researchers
by Doris Arnold, Andrea Glässel, Tabea Böttger, Navina Sarma, Andreas Bethmann and Petra Narimani
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(15), 9336; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159336 - 30 Jul 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5115
Abstract
Participatory approaches create opportunities for cooperation, building relationships, gaining knowledge, rethinking, and eventually changing power structures. From an international perspective, the article looks at the historical development of different participatory approaches in which building relationships and managing the balance of power between persons [...] Read more.
Participatory approaches create opportunities for cooperation, building relationships, gaining knowledge, rethinking, and eventually changing power structures. From an international perspective, the article looks at the historical development of different participatory approaches in which building relationships and managing the balance of power between persons engaged in participatory research are central. The authors present and critically reflect on four research projects to show how they understood and implemented participatory research in different ways and what they have learned from their respective experiences. The “PaSuMi” project worked in the context of addiction prevention with migrants and provides a glimpse into different contexts of participatory research. The initiator of the study “Back into life—with a power wheelchair” works with post-stroke individuals who use the assistive device in community mobility and reflects on the shifting and intertwining roles of participants. In the research project “Workshops for implementation of expanded community nursing”, new professional roles for nurses in community nursing were developed; here limitations to participation and ways to deal with them are illustrated. Finally, the “DIPEx” project deals with challenges of enabling participation of persons with multiple sclerosis via narrative interviews on the experience of health and illness. All examples underline the necessity of a permanent reflection on relationships and power dynamics in participatory research processes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Care from Patients' Perspective)
Back to TopTop