Search Results (1)

Rock Quality Designation (RQD) is among the widely used measures of the quality of rock masses and can be derived through Monte Carlo stochastic process-based fracture network simulations. However, repeated simulations can yield variable RQD results. Here, we introduce a four-step approach that incorporates class ratio analysis to estimate the representative RQD, which includes (1) extracting the mean and confidence interval of the RQD sample, in terms of the Confidence Neutrosophic Number Cubic Value (CNNCV), (2) employing class ratio analysis to determine the thresholds of the number of virtual boreholes and that of the number of models for a given size D, beyond which the CNNCV remains substantially unchanged, (3) accepting the CNNCV at the thresholds of the number of models as the representative RQD for the model of size D (RQD(D)) and (4) determining the representative RQD (rRQD), defined as the specific value which, once D exceeds, the RQD(D) does not change significantly. The introduced approach is illustrated with a case study of an open-pit slope in China, and it was tested for its performance. The RQD calculation results of the proposed method and the traditional single-model approach exhibit differences, which diminish with increasing model sizes. At the 95% confidence level, the stable size of the RQD determined by the proposed method is 13 m, compared to 25 m for the single-model approach. This method enhances the accuracy of representative elementary volume predictions by accounting for the diversity in the simulation results of RQDs for the same size. Overall, the introduced approach offers a reliable method for obtaining RQD estimates. Full article