Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = CRRA (power) utility

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
28 pages, 786 KiB  
Article
Optimal Consumption and Robust Portfolio Choice for the 3/2 and 4/2 Stochastic Volatility Models
by Yuyang Cheng and Marcos Escobar-Anel
Mathematics 2023, 11(18), 4020; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11184020 - 21 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1521
Abstract
This manuscript derives optimal consumption and investment strategies for risk-averse investors under the 4/2 stochastic volatility class of models. We work under an expected utility (EUT) framework and consider a Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA) investor, who may also be ambiguity-averse. The corresponding [...] Read more.
This manuscript derives optimal consumption and investment strategies for risk-averse investors under the 4/2 stochastic volatility class of models. We work under an expected utility (EUT) framework and consider a Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA) investor, who may also be ambiguity-averse. The corresponding Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) and HJB–Isaacs (HJBI) equations are solved in closed-form for a subset of the parametric space and under some restrictions on the portfolio setting, for complete markets. Conditions for proper changes of measure and well-defined solutions are provided. These are the first analytical solutions for the 4/2 stochastic volatility model and the embedded 3/2 model for the type of excess returns established in the literature. We numerically illustrate the differences between the 4/2 model and the embedded cases of the 1/2 model (Heston) as well as the 3/2 model under the same data, and for two main cases: risk-averse investor in a complete market with consumption, and ambiguity-averse investor in a complete market with no consumption. In general, the 4/2 and 1/2 models recommend similar levels of consumption and exposure, while the 3/2 leads to significantly different recommendations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop