Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Arburg Polymer Freeforming (APF)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 5397 KiB  
Article
Novel Processes for the Production of Continuous Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Polymers via Additive Manufacturing and Comparisons
by Simon Zeidler, Nikolas Matkovic, Florian Kößler, Alexander Puchta and Jürgen Fleischer
Polymers 2025, 17(5), 584; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17050584 - 22 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1429
Abstract
Continuous fiber-reinforced polymer (CoFRP) parts offer significant potential for reducing future product consumption and CO2 emissions due to their high tensile properties and low density. Additive manufacturing enables the tool-free production of complex geometries with optimal material utilization, making it a promising [...] Read more.
Continuous fiber-reinforced polymer (CoFRP) parts offer significant potential for reducing future product consumption and CO2 emissions due to their high tensile properties and low density. Additive manufacturing enables the tool-free production of complex geometries with optimal material utilization, making it a promising approach for creating load-path-optimized CoFRP parts. Recent advancements have integrated continuous fibers into laser sintering processes, allowing for the support-free production of complex parts with improved material properties. However, additive manufacturing faces challenges such as long production times, small component dimensions, and defects like high void content. New processes, including Arburg Polymer Freeforming (APF), robotic direct extrusion (DES) and the integration of thermoplastic tapes, and laser sintering, have enabled the production of CoFRPs to address these issues. A comparison of these new processes with existing material extrusion methods is necessary to determine the most suitable approach for specific tasks. The fulfillment factor is used to compare composites with different matrix and fiber materials, representing the percentage of experimentally achieved material properties relative to the theoretical maximum according to the Voigt model. The fulfillment factor varies significantly across different processes and materials. For FFF processes, the fulfillment factor ranges from 20% to 77% for stiffness and 14% to 84% for strength, with an average of 52% and 37%, respectively. APF shows a high fulfillment factor for stiffness (94%) but is lower for strength (23%), attributed to poor fiber–matrix bonding and process-induced pores. The new DES process improves the fulfillment factor due to additional consolidation steps, achieving above-average values for strength (67%). The CoFRP produced by the novel LS process also shows a high fulfillment factor for stiffness (85%) and an average fulfillment factor for strength (39%), influenced by suboptimal process parameters and defects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 7780 KiB  
Article
Influence of the Print Envelope Temperature on the Morphology and Tensile Properties of Thermoplastic Polyolefins Fabricated by Material Extrusion and Material Jetting Additive Manufacturing
by Lukas Hentschel, Sandra Petersmann, Frank Kynast, Ute Schäfer, Clemens Holzer and Joamin Gonzalez-Gutierrez
Polymers 2023, 15(18), 3785; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15183785 - 16 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1857
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) nowadays has become a supportive method of traditional manufacturing. In particular, the medical and healthcare industry can profit from these developments in terms of personalized design and batches ranging from one to five specimens overall. In terms of polymers, polyolefins [...] Read more.
Additive manufacturing (AM) nowadays has become a supportive method of traditional manufacturing. In particular, the medical and healthcare industry can profit from these developments in terms of personalized design and batches ranging from one to five specimens overall. In terms of polymers, polyolefins are always an interesting topic due to their low prices, inert chemistry, and crystalline structure resulting in preferable mechanical properties. Their semi-crystalline nature has some advantages but are challenging for AM due to their shrinkage and warping, resulting in geometrical inaccuracies or even layer detaching during the process. To tackle these issues, process parameter optimization is vital, with one important parameter to be studied more in detail, the print envelope temperature. It is well known that higher print envelope temperatures lead to better layer adhesion overall, but this investigation focuses on the mechanical properties and resulting morphology of a semi-crystalline thermoplastic polyolefin. Further, two different AM technologies, namely material jetting (ARBURG plastic freeforming—APF) and filament-based material extrusion, were studied and compared in detail. It was shown that higher print envelope temperatures lead to more isotropic behavior based on an evenly distributed morphology but results in geometrical inaccuracies since the material is kept in a molten state during printing. This phenomenon especially could be seen in the stress and strain values at break at high elongations. Furthermore, a different crystal structure can be achieved by setting a specific temperature and printing time, also resulting in peak values of certain mechanical properties. In comparison, better results could be archived by the APF technology in terms of mechanical properties and homogeneous morphology. Nevertheless, real isotropic part behavior could not be managed which was shown by the specimen printed vertically. Hence, a sweet spot between geometrical and mechanical properties still has to be found. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 4490 KiB  
Article
Process Optimization for the 3D Printing of PLA and HNT Composites with Arburg Plastic Freeforming
by Leonardo G. Engler, Janaina S. Crespo, Noel M. Gately, Ian Major and Declan M. Devine
J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6(10), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6100309 - 12 Oct 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2869
Abstract
The industrial use of additive manufacturing continues to rapidly increase as new technology developments become available. The Arburg plastic freeforming (APF) process is designed to utilize standard polymeric granules in order to print parts with properties similar to those of molded parts. Despite [...] Read more.
The industrial use of additive manufacturing continues to rapidly increase as new technology developments become available. The Arburg plastic freeforming (APF) process is designed to utilize standard polymeric granules in order to print parts with properties similar to those of molded parts. Despite the emerging industrial importance of APF, the current body of knowledge regarding this technology is still very limited, especially in the field of biodegradable polymer composites. To this end, poly(lactic acid) (PLA) was reinforced with halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) by hot melt extrusion. The PLA/HNT (0–10 wt%.) composites were analyzed in terms of their rheology, morphology, and thermal and mechanical properties. A study of the processing properties of these composites in the context of APF was performed to ensure the consistency of 3D-printed, high-quality components. The optimized machine settings were used to evaluate the tensile properties of specimens printed with different axis orientations (XY and XZ) and deposition angles (0 and 45°). Specimens printed with an XY orientation and deposition angle starting at 0° resulted in the highest mechanical properties. In this study, the use of PLA/HNT composites in an APF process was reported for the first time, and the current methodology achieved satisfactory results in terms of the 3D printing and evaluation of successful PLA/HNT composites to be used as feedstock in an APF process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Composites)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop