Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Acute Care for Elders

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 688 KiB  
Article
Long COVID among Brazilian Adults and Elders 12 Months after Hospital Discharge: A Population-Based Cohort Study
by Maria Aparecida Salci, Lígia Carreira, Natan Nascimento Oliveira, Natan David Pereira, Eduardo Rocha Covre, Giovanna Brichi Pesce, Rosana Rosseto Oliveira, Carla Franciele Höring, Wanessa Cristina Baccon, Jesús Puente Alcaraz, Giovana Alves Santos, Ludmila Lopes Maciel Bolsoni, Andrés Gutiérrez Carmona, João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci, Luiz Augusto Facchini and Carlos Laranjeira
Healthcare 2024, 12(14), 1443; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12141443 - 19 Jul 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2266
Abstract
The persistence of symptoms for more than three months following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is referred to as “Long COVID”. To gain a deeper understanding of the etiology and long-term progression of symptoms, this study aims to analyze the [...] Read more.
The persistence of symptoms for more than three months following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is referred to as “Long COVID”. To gain a deeper understanding of the etiology and long-term progression of symptoms, this study aims to analyze the prevalence of Long COVID and its associated factors in a cohort of Brazilian adults and elders, twelve months after hospital discharge. An observational, prospective, and follow-up study was performed with a cohort of adults and older adults diagnosed with COVID-19 in 2020 in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Twelve months after hospital discharge, patients answered a phone questionnaire about the persistence of symptoms after three levels of exposure to COVID-19’s acute phase (ambulatory, medical ward, and intensive care unit). According to the characteristics of participants, the prevalence of Long COVID-19 was calculated, and logistic regression analyses were conducted. We analyzed data from 1822 participants (980 adults [≥18–<60 years] and 842 older people [≥60 years]) across three exposure levels. The overall Long COVID prevalence was 64.2%. Long COVID was observed in 646 adults (55%; of which 326 were women) and 523 older people (45%; of which 284 were women). Females had a higher prevalence of long-term symptoms (52%) compared with men. The most common post-COVID-19 conditions in the 12-month follow-up were neurological (49.8%), followed by musculoskeletal (35.1%) and persistent respiratory symptoms (26.5%). Male individuals were less likely to develop Long COVID (aOR = 0.50). Other determinants were also considered risky, such as the presence of comorbidities (aOR = 1.41). Being an adult and having been hospitalized was associated with the development of Long COVID. The risk of developing Long COVID was twice as high for ward patients (aOR = 2.53) and three times as high for ICU patients (aOR = 3.56) when compared to non-hospitalized patients. Presenting clinical manifestations of digestive (aOR = 1.56), endocrine (aOR = 2.14), cutaneous (aOR = 2.51), musculoskeletal (aOR = 2.76) and psychological systems (aOR = 1.66) made adults more likely to develop Long COVID. Long COVID was present in a large proportion of people affected by the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Presence of Long COVID symptoms displayed a dose–response relationship with the level of disease exposure, with a greater prevalence of symptoms associated with the severe form in the acute period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Health Before, During, and After COVID-19)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 326 KiB  
Review
A Lethal Combination of Delirium and Overcrowding in the Emergency Department
by Alessandra Bonfichi, Iride Francesca Ceresa, Andrea Piccioni, Christian Zanza, Yaroslava Longhitano, Zoubir Boudi, Ciro Esposito and Gabriele Savioli
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(20), 6587; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206587 - 18 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2695
Abstract
Delirium is a common public health concern that significantly impacts older patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED). This condition is linked to adverse outcomes such as reduced long-term functionality, higher mortality rates, extended hospital stays, and increased medical costs. The identification of [...] Read more.
Delirium is a common public health concern that significantly impacts older patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED). This condition is linked to adverse outcomes such as reduced long-term functionality, higher mortality rates, extended hospital stays, and increased medical costs. The identification of risk factors is crucial for the early recognition and management of delirium in ED patients. Aging, cognitive decline, polypharmacy, and sensory impairment are some of the most common general risk factors described in the literature. Although validated delirium assessment tools already exist, they are not practical for the fast-paced ED environment because of their extended evaluation period or specialized training request. Moreover, clear guidance is needed to select the most suitable tool for detecting delirium, balancing between the accuracy and the swiftness required in an overcrowded, high-stress, and understaffed healthcare setting. This narrative review aims to analyze the updated literature on delirium risk factors in older ED patients and focuses on the methods for better screening, managing, and treating this condition in the ED. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Emergency Medicine)
23 pages, 901 KiB  
Review
SARS-CoV-2: An Update on Genomics, Risk Assessment, Potential Therapeutics and Vaccine Development
by Iqra Mehmood, Munazza Ijaz, Sajjad Ahmad, Temoor Ahmed, Amna Bari, Asma Abro, Khaled S. Allemailem, Ahmad Almatroudi and Muhammad Tahir ul Qamar
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 1626; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041626 - 8 Feb 2021
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5631
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a great threat to public health, being a causative pathogen of a deadly coronavirus disease (COVID-19). It has spread to more than 200 countries and infected millions of individuals globally. Although SARS-CoV-2 has structural/genomic similarities [...] Read more.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a great threat to public health, being a causative pathogen of a deadly coronavirus disease (COVID-19). It has spread to more than 200 countries and infected millions of individuals globally. Although SARS-CoV-2 has structural/genomic similarities with the previously reported SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, the specific mutations in its genome make it a novel virus. Available therapeutic strategies failed to control this virus. Despite strict standard operating procedures (SOPs), SARS-CoV-2 has spread globally and it is mutating gradually as well. Diligent efforts, special care, and awareness are needed to reduce transmission among susceptible masses particularly elder people, children, and health care workers. In this review, we highlighted the basic genome organization and structure of SARS-CoV-2. Its transmission dynamics, symptoms, and associated risk factors are discussed. This review also presents the latest mutations identified in its genome, the potential therapeutic options being used, and a brief explanation of vaccine development efforts against COVID-19. The effort will not only help readers to understand the deadly SARS-CoV-2 virus but also provide updated information to researchers for their research work. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 820 KiB  
Concept Paper
ACE Model for Older Adults in ED
by Martine Sanon, Ula Hwang, Gallane Abraham, Suzanne Goldhirsch, Lynne D. Richardson and GEDI WISE Investigators
Geriatrics 2019, 4(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics4010024 - 21 Feb 2019
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 14287
Abstract
The emergency department (ED) is uniquely positioned to improve care for older adults and affect patient outcome trajectories. The Mount Sinai Hospital ED cares for 15,000+ patients >65 years old annually. From 2012 to 2015, emergency care in a dedicated Geriatric Emergency Department [...] Read more.
The emergency department (ED) is uniquely positioned to improve care for older adults and affect patient outcome trajectories. The Mount Sinai Hospital ED cares for 15,000+ patients >65 years old annually. From 2012 to 2015, emergency care in a dedicated Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) replicated an Acute Care for Elderly (ACE) model, with focused assessments on common geriatric syndromes and daily comprehensive interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings for high-risk patients. The IDT, comprised of an emergency physician, geriatrician, transitional care nurse (TCN) or geriatric nurse practitioner (NP), ED nurse, social worker (SW), pharmacist (RX), and physical therapist (PT), developed comprehensive care plans for vulnerable older adults at high risk for morbidity, ED revisit, functional decline, or potentially avoidable hospital admission. Patients were identified using the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screen, followed by geriatric assessments to assist in the evaluation of elders in the ED. On average, 38 patients per day were evaluated by the IDT with approximately 30% of these patients formally discussed during IDT rounds. Input from the IDT about functional and cognitive, psychosocial, home safety, and pharmacological assessments influenced decisions on hospital admission, care transitions, access to community based resources, and medication management. This paper describes the role of a Geriatric Emergency Medicine interdisciplinary team as an innovative ACE model of care for older adults who present to the ED. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geriatric Care Models)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 969 KiB  
Article
Geriatrics Evaluation and Management in the Veterans Administration—An Historical Perspective
by James S. Powers and Kathryn J. Eubank
Geriatrics 2018, 3(4), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics3040084 - 25 Nov 2018
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 6254
Abstract
Comprehensive geriatric assessment, defined as an interdisciplinary assessment and development of an overall plan of treatment and follow-up, has become a fundamental part of clinical geriatric care. Since the 1970s, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has encouraged the development of geriatric [...] Read more.
Comprehensive geriatric assessment, defined as an interdisciplinary assessment and development of an overall plan of treatment and follow-up, has become a fundamental part of clinical geriatric care. Since the 1970s, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has encouraged the development of geriatric evaluation and management programs. Evolution of geriatric evaluation and management has occurred over time and many VA medical centers have transferred inpatient geriatric evaluation programs to long-term care Community Living Centers, home, and outpatient settings. Availability of geriatric resources and trained personnel across the continuum of care as well as administrative collaboration between care components are critical to the successful implementation of geriatric services. Facilities may need to prioritize their resources and utilize the most effective and relevant elements of geriatric evaluation and management according to patient population needs, available space, resources, and institutional priorities. New risk assessment tools derived from the VA’s experience in geriatric evaluation may be useful for targeting services for other high-risk populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geriatric Care Models)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 973 KiB  
Commentary
The Acute Care for Elders Unit Model of Care
by Robert M. Palmer
Geriatrics 2018, 3(3), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics3030059 - 11 Sep 2018
Cited by 75 | Viewed by 16293
Abstract
Older patients are at risk for loss of self-care abilities during the course of an acute medical illness that results in hospitalization. The Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Unit is a continuous quality improvement model of care designed to prevent the patient’s loss [...] Read more.
Older patients are at risk for loss of self-care abilities during the course of an acute medical illness that results in hospitalization. The Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Unit is a continuous quality improvement model of care designed to prevent the patient’s loss of independence from admission to discharge in the performance of activities of daily living (hospital-associated disability). The ACE unit intervention includes principles of a prepared environment that encourages safe patient self-care, a set of clinical guidelines for bedside care by nurses and other health professionals to prevent patient disability and restore self-care lost by the acute illness, and planning for transitions of care and medical care. By applying a structured process, an interdisciplinary team completes a geriatric assessment, follows clinical guidelines, and initiates plans for care transitions in concert with the patient and family. Three randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of ACE or related interventions demonstrate reduced functional disability among patients, reduced risk of nursing home admission, and lower costs of hospitalization. ACE principles could improve elderly care in any acute setting. The aim of this commentary is to describe the ACE model and the basis of its effectiveness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geriatric Care Models)
Show Figures

Figure 1

3 pages, 144 KiB  
Editorial
Strategies to Promote Broad-Based Implementation of Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Units
by Roger Y. Wong
Geriatrics 2018, 3(3), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics3030058 - 6 Sep 2018
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5286
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geriatric Care Models)
14 pages, 763 KiB  
Review
Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Team Model of Care: A Clinical Overview
by Kellie L. Flood, Katrina Booth, Jasmine Vickers, Emily Simmons, David H. James, Shari Biswal, Jill Deaver, Marjorie Lee White and Ella H. Bowman
Geriatrics 2018, 3(3), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics3030050 - 6 Aug 2018
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 9419
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) Reports of To Err is Human and Crossing the Quality Chasm have called for more interprofessional and coordinated hospital care. For over 20 years, Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Units and models of care that disseminate ACE principles [...] Read more.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) Reports of To Err is Human and Crossing the Quality Chasm have called for more interprofessional and coordinated hospital care. For over 20 years, Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Units and models of care that disseminate ACE principles have demonstrated outcomes in-line with the IOM goals. The objective of this overview is to provide a concise summary of studies that describe outcomes of ACE models of care published in 1995 or later. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion. Of these, 19 studies were from ACE Units and three were evaluations of ACE Services, or teams that cared for patients on more than one hospital unit. Outcomes from these studies included increased adherence to evidence-based geriatric care processes, improved patient functional status at time of hospital discharge, and reductions in length of stay and costs in patients admitted to ACE models compared to usual care. These outcomes represent value-based care. As interprofessional team models are adopted, training in successful team functioning will also be needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geriatric Care Models)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop