Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = 1.5-dimensional Teager kurtosis spectrum

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 5040 KiB  
Article
Fault Feature Extraction Method of Ball Screw Based on Singular Value Decomposition, CEEMDAN and 1.5DTES
by Qin Wu, Jun Niu and Xinglian Wang
Actuators 2023, 12(11), 416; https://doi.org/10.3390/act12110416 - 7 Nov 2023
Viewed by 2059
Abstract
In this article, a method is proposed to effectively extract weak fault features and accurately diagnose faults in ball screws, even in the presence of strong background noise. This method combines singular value decomposition (SVD), complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise [...] Read more.
In this article, a method is proposed to effectively extract weak fault features and accurately diagnose faults in ball screws, even in the presence of strong background noise. This method combines singular value decomposition (SVD), complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN), and the 1.5-dimensional spectrum (1.5D) to process and analyze fault vibration signals. The first step involves decomposing the fault signal using the SVD algorithm. The singular values are then screened, and the part of the screen containing more noise information is extracted to complete the first denoising step. The second step involves decomposing the signal after the initial denoising process using CEEMDAN and removing some of the false components from the intrinsic mode function (IMF) components, based on the kurtosis correlation function index. The signal is then reconstructed to complete the second denoising step. Finally, the denoised signal is analyzed using Teager energy operator demodulation and 1.5D spectral analysis to extract the fault frequency and determine the location of the fault in the ball screw. This method has been compared with other denoising methods, such as wavelet packet decomposition combined with CEEMDAN or SVD combined with variational mode decomposition (VMD), and the results show that under the condition of strong background noise, the proposed method can better extract the fault frequency of ball screw. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Actuators for Manufacturing Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6201 KiB  
Article
Research on Extraction of Compound Fault Characteristics for Rolling Bearings in Wind Turbines
by Ling Xiang, Hao Su and Ying Li
Entropy 2020, 22(6), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/e22060682 - 18 Jun 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3670
Abstract
Wind turbines work in strong background noise, and multiple faults often occur where features are mixed together and are easily misjudged. To extract composite fault of rolling bearings from wind turbines, a new hybrid approach was proposed based on multi-point optimal minimum entropy [...] Read more.
Wind turbines work in strong background noise, and multiple faults often occur where features are mixed together and are easily misjudged. To extract composite fault of rolling bearings from wind turbines, a new hybrid approach was proposed based on multi-point optimal minimum entropy deconvolution adjusted (MOMEDA) and the 1.5-dimensional Teager kurtosis spectrum. The composite fault signal was deconvoluted using the MOMEDA method. The deconvoluted signal was analyzed by applying the 1.5-dimensional Teager kurtosis spectrum. Finally, the frequency characteristics were extracted for the bearing fault. A bearing composite fault signal with strong background noise was utilized to prove the validity of the method. Two actual cases on bearing fault detection were analyzed with wind turbines. The results show that the method is suitable for the diagnosis of wind turbine compound faults and can be applied to research on the health behavior of wind turbines. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop