Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Sandra Salter ORCID = 0000-0002-5840-6797

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
2 pages, 169 KiB  
Correction
Correction: Amin et al. Evaluation of Medication Prescribing Applications Available in Australia. Pharmacy 2023, 11, 49
by Riya Amin, Melissa Cato, Sasha Rahavi, Kristin Tran, Kenneth Lee, Elton Lobo, Deanna Mill, Amy Page and Sandra Salter
Pharmacy 2023, 11(5), 165; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11050165 - 13 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1495
Abstract
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...] Full article
13 pages, 733 KiB  
Article
Patients’ Perspectives on Commencing Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: An Exploratory Qualitative Descriptive Study
by Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes, Sandra M. Salter, Leanne Chalmers, Jan Radford, Kenneth Lee and Danielle D’Lima
Pharmacy 2023, 11(5), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11050153 - 23 Sep 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2350
Abstract
Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are prescribed to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in order to lower stroke risk. However, patient refusal to commence OACs hinders effective anticoagulation. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to patient agreement to commence OACs from the [...] Read more.
Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are prescribed to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in order to lower stroke risk. However, patient refusal to commence OACs hinders effective anticoagulation. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to patient agreement to commence OACs from the perspectives of patients with AF attending Australian general practices. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study utilising semi-structured individual interviews was conducted from March to July 2022. Results: Ten patients (60% male, median age = 78.5 years) completed interviews. Patients’ passive roles in decision-making were identified as a facilitator. Other prominent facilitators included doctors explaining adequately and aligning their recommendations with patients’ overall health goals, including the prevention of stroke and associated disabilities, and a clear understanding of the pros and cons of taking OACs. Reportedly insufficient explanation from doctors and the inconvenience associated with taking warfarin were identified as potential barriers. Conclusion: Addressing factors that influence patient agreement to commence OACs should be an essential aspect of quality improvement interventions. Subsequent studies should also delve into the perspectives of eligible patients with AF who choose not to commence OACs as well as the perspectives of both patients and doctors regarding the decision to continue OAC treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimising Medication Management and Use of Antithrombotic Agents)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1065 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Medication Prescribing Applications Available in Australia
by Riya Amin, Melissa Cato, Sasha Rahavi, Kristin Tran, Kenneth Lee, Elton Lobo, Deanna Mill, Amy Page and Sandra Salter
Pharmacy 2023, 11(2), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11020049 - 6 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3474 | Correction
Abstract
Prescription request applications (apps) have changed the way consumers can obtain prescription-only medications. However, there is a lack of research surrounding such apps and their potential risks to consumers. We conducted an Australian study to (1) identify and characterise prescription request apps available [...] Read more.
Prescription request applications (apps) have changed the way consumers can obtain prescription-only medications. However, there is a lack of research surrounding such apps and their potential risks to consumers. We conducted an Australian study to (1) identify and characterise prescription request apps available in Australia and (2) assess whether prescription request apps in Australia adhere to guidelines for safe prescribing. Three online platforms (iOS App Store, Google Play store and Google search engine) were searched using 14 different search terms. Prescription request apps were identified based on pre-defined inclusion criteria. To determine whether the prescription request apps adhere to a safe prescribing framework, five medications were selected, and their corresponding consultation questionnaires were assessed against the Australian National Prescribing Service MedicineWise 12 core competencies for safe prescribing. A total of seven prescription request apps were identified. Assessment of the prescription request apps revealed that none of the apps provided prescribers with sufficient information to meet all the competencies required for safe prescribing; rather, they inconsistently adhered to the safe prescribing framework. Thus, consumers and healthcare professionals should consider the implications and safety concerns of obtaining medications via prescription request apps. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Health in Pharmacy Practice and Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 280 KiB  
Article
Immediate Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Australian Pharmacies: A Retrospective Review
by Alexander T. Gallo, Lisa Scanlon, Jade Clifford, Lawson Patten-Williams, Lachlan Tweedie, Dani Li and Sandra M. Salter
Vaccines 2022, 10(12), 2041; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10122041 - 29 Nov 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3080
Abstract
Background: Four COVID-19 vaccines are approved for use in Australia: Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (Comirnaty), AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 (Vaxzevria), Moderna mRNA-1273 (Spikevax), and Novavax NVX-CoV2373 (Nuvaxovid). We sought to examine the type and management of immediate adverse events following immunisation (I-AEFI) after COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: Retrospective [...] Read more.
Background: Four COVID-19 vaccines are approved for use in Australia: Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (Comirnaty), AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 (Vaxzevria), Moderna mRNA-1273 (Spikevax), and Novavax NVX-CoV2373 (Nuvaxovid). We sought to examine the type and management of immediate adverse events following immunisation (I-AEFI) after COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: Retrospective review of I-AEFI recorded between July 2021 and June 2022 in 314 community pharmacies in Australia. Results: I-AEFI were recorded in 0.05% (n = 526/977,559) of all COVID-19 vaccinations (highest: AstraZeneca (n = 173/161,857; 0.11%); lowest: Pfizer (n = 50/258,606; 0.02%)). The most common reactions were: (1) syncope, after the first dose of AstraZeneca (n = 105/67,907; 0.15%), Moderna (n = 156/108,339; 0.14%), and Pfizer (n = 22/16,287; 0.14%); and (2) Nausea/vomiting after the first dose of Pfizer (n = 9/16,287; 0.06%), Moderna (n = 55/108,339; 0.05%), and AstraZeneca (n = 31/67,907; 0.05%) vaccines. A total of 23 anaphylactic reactions were recorded (n = 23/977,559; 0.002%), and 59 additional I-AEFI were identified using MedDRA® terminology. Pharmacists primarily managed syncope by laying the patient down (n = 227/342; 66.4%); nausea/vomiting was managed primarily by laying the patient down (n = 62/126; 49.2%), giving water (n = 38/126; 30.2%), or monitoring in the pharmacy (n = 29/126; 23.0%); anaphylactic reaction was treated with adrenaline (n = 18/23; 78.3%) and n = 13/23 (56.5%) anaphylactic reactions were treated with the combination of: administered adrenaline, called ambulance, and laid patient down. Conclusion: The most commonly recorded I-AEFI was syncope after COVID-19 vaccination in pharmacy; I-AEFI are similar to those previously reported. Pharmacists identified and managed serious and non-serious I-AEFI appropriately and comprehensively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adverse Events of COVID-19 Vaccines)
15 pages, 533 KiB  
Article
Safety of Four COVID-19 Vaccines across Primary Doses 1, 2, 3 and Booster: A Prospective Cohort Study of Australian Community Pharmacy Vaccinations
by Sandra M. Salter, Dani Li, Kevin Trentino, Lisa Nissen, Kenneth Lee, Karin Orlemann, Ian Peters, Kevin Murray, Alan Leeb and Lucy Deng
Vaccines 2022, 10(12), 2017; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10122017 - 25 Nov 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3190
Abstract
Four COVID-19 vaccines are approved for use in Australia: Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (Comirnaty), AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 (Vaxzevria), Moderna mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) and Novavax NVX-CoV2373 (Nuvaxovid). We sought to examine adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) at days 3 and 42 after primary doses 1, 2, 3 and [...] Read more.
Four COVID-19 vaccines are approved for use in Australia: Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (Comirnaty), AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 (Vaxzevria), Moderna mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) and Novavax NVX-CoV2373 (Nuvaxovid). We sought to examine adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) at days 3 and 42 after primary doses 1, 2, 3 and booster. We conducted active vaccine safety surveillance from 130 community pharmacies in Australia integrated with AusVaxSafety, between August 2021–April 2022. Main outcomes: AEFI at 0–3 days post-vaccination; medical review/advice at 3 days and 42 days post-vaccination; SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection by day 42. Of 110,024 completed day 3 surveys (43.6% response rate), 50,367 (45.8%) reported any AEFI (highest proportions: Pfizer 42%, primary dose 3; AstraZeneca 58.3%, primary dose 1; Moderna 65.4% and Novavax 58.8%, both primary dose 2). The most common AEFI reported across all doses/vaccines were local reactions, systemic aches and fatigue/tiredness. Overall, 2172/110,024 (2.0%) and 1182/55,329 (2.1%) respondents sought medical review at days 3 and 42, respectively, and 931/42,318 (2.2%) reported breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection at day 42. We identified similar AEFI profiles but at lower proportions than previously reported for Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna and Novavax COVID-19 vaccines. Moderna vaccine was the most reactogenic and associated with higher AEFI proportions across primary doses 2, 3, and booster. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety and Autoimmune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop