Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Niv Mor

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
8 pages, 219 KiB  
Article
Ninety-Nine Percent? Re-Examining the Consensus on the Anthropogenic Contribution to Climate Change
by David Dentelski, Ran Damari, Yanir Marmor, Avner Niv, Mor Roses and Yonatan Dubi
Climate 2023, 11(11), 215; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11110215 - 30 Oct 2023
Viewed by 23961
Abstract
Anthropogenic activity is considered a central driver of current climate change. A recent paper, studying the consensus regarding the hypothesis that the recent increase in global temperature is predominantly human-made via the emission of greenhouse gasses (see text for reference), argued that the [...] Read more.
Anthropogenic activity is considered a central driver of current climate change. A recent paper, studying the consensus regarding the hypothesis that the recent increase in global temperature is predominantly human-made via the emission of greenhouse gasses (see text for reference), argued that the scientific consensus in the peer-reviewed scientific literature pertaining to this hypothesis exceeds 99%. This conclusion was reached after the authors scanned the abstracts and titles of some 3000 papers and mapped them according to their (abstract) statements regarding the above hypothesis. Here, we point out some major flaws in the methodology, analysis, and conclusions of the study. Using the data provided in the study, we show that the 99% consensus, as defined by the authors, is actually an upper limit evaluation because of the large number of “neutral” papers which were counted as pro-consensus in the paper and probably does not reflect the true situation. We further analyze these results by evaluating how so-called “skeptic” papers fit the consensus and find that biases in the literature, which were not accounted for in the aforementioned study, may place the consensus on the low side. Finally, we show that the rating method used in the study suffers from a subjective bias which is reflected in large variations between ratings of the same paper by different raters. All these lead to the conclusion that the conclusions of the study does not follow from the data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Policy, Governance, and Social Equity)
10 pages, 447 KiB  
Review
Temporomandibular Myofacial Pain Treated with Botulinum Toxin Injection
by Niv Mor, Christropher Tang and Andrew Blitzer
Toxins 2015, 7(8), 2791-2800; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7082791 - 24 Jul 2015
Cited by 54 | Viewed by 20981
Abstract
This article reviews the diagnoses and treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and outlines of the role of botulinum toxin (BoNT) in the treatment of myofacial TMD. This manuscript includes a brief history of the use of BoNT in the treatment of pain, the [...] Read more.
This article reviews the diagnoses and treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and outlines of the role of botulinum toxin (BoNT) in the treatment of myofacial TMD. This manuscript includes a brief history of the use of BoNT in the treatment of pain, the mechanism of action of BoNT, and the techniques for injections, adverse effects and contraindications when using BoNT to treat mayofacial pain caused by TMD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Botulinum Toxins on Human Pain)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop